Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways VS Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

Compare Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways VS Azure Multi-Factor Authentication and see what are their differences

Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways logo Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways

Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways offers secure internet access for the employees.

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication logo Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication helps safeguard access to data and applications while meeting user demand for a simple sign-in process.
  • Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-06
  • Azure Multi-Factor Authentication Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-19

Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways features and specs

  • Comprehensive Protection
    Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways offers extensive security measures including anti-malware, anti-phishing, and web control, providing robust protection against a wide range of threats.
  • Real-time Traffic Scanning
    The solution includes real-time scanning of web traffic, ensuring that threats are detected and neutralized before they can infiltrate the network.
  • High Performance and Low Latency
    Despite its comprehensive security features, the software is optimized for high performance, resulting in minimal impact on network speed and user experience.
  • Cloud-Assisted Intelligence
    Utilizes cloud-assisted technology for real-time threat intelligence and updates, ensuring the most current protection against emerging threats.
  • Customizable Policies
    Allows network administrators to set and customize security policies according to their specific organizational needs and compliance requirements.

Possible disadvantages of Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways

  • Complexity in Setup
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex and may require advanced IT knowledge or professional assistance.
  • Subscription and Licensing Costs
    Ongoing subscription and licensing fees can be relatively high, especially for small to medium-sized businesses with limited budgets.
  • Resource-Intensive
    The software can be resource-intensive, potentially requiring more robust hardware to handle peak loads effectively.
  • Potential for False Positives
    There is a possibility of false positives where legitimate traffic can be mistakenly flagged as malicious, potentially disrupting business operations.
  • Vendor Trust Concerns
    Due to geopolitical factors and concerns about privacy implications, some organizations may hesitate to use Kaspersky products.

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication features and specs

  • Enhanced Security
    Azure MFA adds an additional layer of security by requiring users to verify their identity through multiple methods, reducing the risk of unauthorized access.
  • Flexible Authentication Options
    It supports various authentication methods such as phone calls, text messages, app notifications, and hardware tokens, providing flexibility for users.
  • Integration with Microsoft Services
    Seamless integration with other Microsoft services and Azure Active Directory ensures a cohesive security solution across different Microsoft platforms.
  • Compliance Support
    Helps organizations meet compliance requirements by providing an additional layer of security that is often mandated by regulations like GDPR, HIPAA, etc.
  • User-friendly
    Designed to be straightforward for end-users, reducing the friction typically associated with multi-factor authentication processes.
  • Conditional Access Policies
    Enables the configuration of conditional access policies to enforce MFA for specific scenarios, balancing security needs and user convenience.

Possible disadvantages of Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

  • Cost
    While some features are available for free, comprehensive usage of Azure MFA can incur additional costs depending on the Azure AD licensing model.
  • Setup Complexity
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex, especially for organizations without a dedicated IT team.
  • Reliance on Internet Connectivity
    Most verification methods require an internet connection, which can be a drawback in environments with unstable or unreliable internet access.
  • Potential User Resistance
    Some users may find the authentication process cumbersome or may resist changes to the login process, requiring additional user education and support.
  • Dependency on External Devices
    Authentication methods like text messages or app notifications depend on users having access to their mobile devices, which can be problematic if a device is lost or stolen.
  • Integration Challenges with Non-Microsoft Services
    While Azure MFA integrates well with Microsoft services, integration with third-party or non-Microsoft applications may require additional configuration and support.

Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways videos

No Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication videos

How to register for Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways and Azure Multi-Factor Authentication)
Cyber Security
100 100%
0% 0
Identity And Access Management
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Two Factor Authentication

User comments

Share your experience with using Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways and Azure Multi-Factor Authentication. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Azure Multi-Factor Authentication seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways yet. Tracking of Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication mentions (2)

  • MFA for Outlook Online on cell phone
    This is the answer, more detail: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/authentication/concept-mfa-howitworks. Source: about 3 years ago
  • What do you do if you lost your phone with Microsoft Authenticator?
    Make sure that you back-up the active app-configuration, this way you have an easier way to recover; make sure you are allowed to verify using more than an authenticator, more here. Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways and Azure Multi-Factor Authentication, you can also consider the following products

Cisco Umbrella - Cisco Umbrella is a cloud security platform that provides the first line of defense against threats on the internet.

Google Authenticator - Google Authenticator is a multifactor app for mobile devices.

McAfee SmartFilter - McAfee Web Protection is a web security solution that includes an on-premises secure web gateway and SaaS-based web security delivered from the cloud.

Authy - Best rated Two-Factor Authentication smartphone app for consumers, simplest 2fa Rest API for developers and a strong authentication platform for the enterprise.

OpenDNS Umbrella - Cloud Security

Duo Security - Duo Security provides cloud-based two-factor authentication. Duo’s technology can be deployed to protect users, data, and applications from breaches, credential theft, and account takeover.