Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Kafka Streams VS RabbitMQ

Compare Kafka Streams VS RabbitMQ and see what are their differences

Kafka Streams logo Kafka Streams

Apache Kafka: A Distributed Streaming Platform.

RabbitMQ logo RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.
  • Kafka Streams Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-21
  • RabbitMQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-03

Kafka Streams videos

Spark Streaming Vs Kafka Streams || Which is The Best for Stream Processing?

More videos:

  • Review - Big Data Analytics in Near-Real-Time with Apache Kafka Streams - Allen Underwood
  • Review - Spring Tips: Spring Cloud Stream Kafka Streams

RabbitMQ videos

數據工程 | 快速review | 如何架設Docker Swarm + RabbitMQ??

More videos:

  • Review - What's New in RabbitMQ—June 2012 Edition
  • Review - Feature complete: Uncovering the true cost different RabbitMQ features and configs - Jack Vanlightly

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Kafka Streams and RabbitMQ)
Stream Processing
16 16%
84% 84
Data Integration
0 0%
100% 100
Big Data
100 100%
0% 0
Web Service Automation
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Kafka Streams and RabbitMQ. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Kafka Streams and RabbitMQ

Kafka Streams Reviews

We have no reviews of Kafka Streams yet.
Be the first one to post

RabbitMQ Reviews

Best message queue for cloud-native apps
RabbitMQ is an open-source message broker software that allows applications to communicate with each other using a messaging protocol. It was developed by Rabbit Technologies and first released in 2007, which was later acquired by VMware.RabbitMQ is based on the Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP) and provides a reliable, scalable, and interoperable messaging system.
Source: docs.vanus.ai
Are Free, Open-Source Message Queues Right For You?
However, it's important to note that every tool has its strengths and use cases. For instance, Kafka's strength lies in real-time data streaming, NATS shines with its simplicity, and RabbitMQ provides support for complex routing. In contrast, IronMQ provides an excellent balance of simplicity, durability, scalability, and ease of management, making it a powerful choice for...
Source: blog.iron.io
NATS vs RabbitMQ vs NSQ vs Kafka | Gcore
RabbitMQ follows a standard store-and-forward pattern, allowing messages to be stored in RAM, on disk, or both. To ensure the persistence of messages, the producer can tag them as persistent, and they will be stored in a separate queue. This helps achieve message retention even after a restart or failure of the RabbitMQ server.
Source: gcore.com
6 Best Kafka Alternatives: 2022’s Must-know List
Due to RabbitMQ’s lightweight design, it can be easily deployed on public and private clouds. RabbitMQ is backed not only by a robust support system but also offers a great developer community. Since it is open-source software it is one of the best Kafka Alternatives and RabbitMQ is free of cost.
Source: hevodata.com
Top 15 Alternatives to RabbitMQ In 2021
In this article, we will discuss an overview on RabbitMQ Alternatives. RabbitMQ has a flexible messaging system and functions as a multipurpose broker. But it often stops working, because of its high latency and very slow while doing so. The deployment & management of RabbitMQ is a too dull procedure. It can not be installed as modules, it can be installed only on machines...
Source: gokicker.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Kafka Streams seems to be a lot more popular than RabbitMQ. While we know about 14 links to Kafka Streams, we've tracked only 1 mention of RabbitMQ. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Kafka Streams mentions (14)

  • Top 10 Common Data Engineers and Scientists Pain Points in 2024
    Data scientists often prefer Python for its simplicity and powerful libraries like Pandas or SciPy. However, many real-time data processing tools are Java-based. Take the example of Kafka, Flink, or Spark streaming. While these tools have their Python API/wrapper libraries, they introduce increased latency, and data scientists need to manage dependencies for both Python and JVM environments. For example,... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Forward Compatible Enum Values in API with Java Jackson
    We’re not discussing the technical details behind the deduplication process. It could be Apache Flink, Apache Spark, or Kafka Streams. Anyway, it’s out of the scope of this article. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Kafka Internals - Learn kafka in-depth (Part-1)
    In pub-sub systems, you cannot have multiple services to consume the same data because the messages are deleted after being consumed by one consumer. Whereas in Kafka, you can have multiple services to consume. This opens the door to a lot of opportunities such as Kafka streams, Kafka connect. We’ll discuss these at the end of the series. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Event streaming in .Net with Kafka
    Internally, Streamiz use the .Net client for Apache Kafka released by Confluent and try to provide the same features than Kafka Streams. There is gap between these two library, but the trend is decreasing after each release. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Apache Pulsar vs Apache Kafka - How to choose a data streaming platform
    Both Kafka and Pulsar provide some kind of stream processing capability, but Kafka is much further along in that regard. Pulsar stream processing relies on the Pulsar Functions interface which is only suited for simple callbacks. On the other hand, Kafka Streams and ksqlDB are more complete solutions that could be considered replacements for Apache Spark or Apache Flink, state-of-the-art stream-processing... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

RabbitMQ mentions (1)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Kafka Streams and RabbitMQ, you can also consider the following products

Apache Flink - Flink is a streaming dataflow engine that provides data distribution, communication, and fault tolerance for distributed computations.

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.

Apache NiFi - An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data.

IBM MQ - IBM MQ is messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and data across multiple platforms.

Apache Airflow - Airflow is a platform to programmaticaly author, schedule and monitor data pipelines.

Apache ActiveMQ - Apache ActiveMQ is an open source messaging and integration patterns server.