JW Player VS Micro

JW Player

JW Player is an embeddable media player.

Micro

Modern terminal-based text editor

Landing page //
2023-09-25

Landing page //
2018-12-16

JW Player

Website: jwplayer.com
$ Details: -
Release Date: 2004 January
Startup details
Country: United States
State: New York
City: New York
Founder(s): Adam Fawer
Employees: 100 - 249

Edit details

Micro

Website: micro-editor.github.io
$ Details
Release Date: -

Edit details

JW Player videos

+ Add

JW Player Employee Reviews - Q3 2018

Micro videos

+ Add

Microeconomics- Everything You Need to Know

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to JW Player and Micro)

Micro

Video Platform

100 100%

Video Platform

0% 0

Text Editors

0 0%

Text Editors

100% 100

YouTube Tools

100 100%

YouTube Tools

0% 0

IDE

0 0%

IDE

100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using JW Player and Micro. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare JW Player and Micro

Regarding online video platforms, JW Player can also be a fine option. Whether you’re a content creator or a business, JW Player’s versatile features cater to your videos. Its powerful API and analytics capabilities make it a standout choice for those looking to deliver an exemplary video experience.

Source: medium.com

Micro Reviews

We have no reviews of Micro yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Micro seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 77 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

JW Player mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of JW Player yet. Tracking of JW Player recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Micro mentions (77)

GNU Nano 8 comes with modern key bindings
This is great! I used to install micro[0] as "nano with better shortcuts", but it was always a bit of an overkill, so I'm really happy with this change. One quirk that remains: even with --modernbindings, Ctrl+X and Ctrl+C will add to nano's clipboard, instead of replacing whatever is there. [0] https://micro-editor.github.io. - Source: Hacker News / about 9 hours ago
Modeless Vim
Is Micro[0] not a better, more purpose-fit solution to these issues? (Syntax highlighting quality, etc) Prev discussed: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37171294. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
Essential Command Line Tools for Developers
To see more screenshots of micro, showcasing some of the default color schemes, see here. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
A simple guide for configuring sudo and doas
There are two main ways to configure sudo.The first one is using the sudoers file.It is located at /etc/sudoers for Linux,and /usr/local/etc/sudoers for FreeBSD respectively.The paths are different,but the configuration works in the same way. A typical sudoers file looks like this. The sudoers file must be edited with the visudo command,which ensures the config is free of errors.Running this command as the... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Microsoft is exploring adding a command line text editor into Windows, and it wants your feedback
I really like micro, a nano-like editor with a very sane, regular people friendly keybinding. Source: 6 months ago