JUCE VS Glade

Personally, I started by writing externals for Pure Data, then started to contribute to the care. Later I took the same path for SuperCollider. The more typical path, I guess, would be to start with simple audio plugins. Have a look at JUCE (https://juce.com/)! Realtime audio programming has some rather strict requirements that you don't have in most other software. Check out this classic article:... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

Check out https://juce.com in the meantime. Source: 5 months ago

You can definitely start putting C++ into your embedded projects, and get familiar with things in an environment in which you're already operating. A lot of great C++ code can be found with motivated use of, for example, the platformio tooling, such that you can see for yourself some existing C++ In Embedded scenarios. In general, also, I have found that it is wise to learn C++ socially - i.e. Participate in Open... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

Https://juce.com Maybe that's what you want? - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

Respect for the others here who recommend C but I think they’re possibly masochists. If anything JUCE, which uses C++ is in my opinion far more approachable. Source: 11 months ago

Basically title, I see that https://glade.gnome.org/ from apt info glade points to an empty website. Source: about 1 year ago

The Glade website says that, as of August 2022, it's not being developed anymore and I remember reading an article somewhere (Phoronix?) saying that the GTK devs consider it deprecated and want you hand-writing GTKBuilder XML instead. I remember hearing several months ago that the GTK devs were deprecating Glade in favour of expecting people to hand-write GTKBuilder XML. Source: about 1 year ago

So, what's the best way to tackle the challenge: writing GNOME extensions + bind them to GNOME app, or GJS, or Glade, or something else? I thought about working directly with the specific tool's source code but then I realise it'll be just a waste of my time decoding the code written by somebody else for the sake of adding a few hundred lines of code that would still make just a miserable part of the original... Source: over 1 year ago

Can't argue with that, but to me it seems that things have substantially deteriorated since desktop GUIs fell out of fashion. Maybe that tells you more about my age than about the state of the art, but in the 90's one could "learn" GUI programming in about 30min in a RAD tool by throwing controls in containers and implementing callback functions in "direct style" for the event (Qt , swing, Java/ScalaFX, Gtk,... Source: over 1 year ago

I'm also learning Pyhton with GTK. I don't know if you already use GTK4 or if you decided to stick with GTK3 to be able to generate the xml file with Glade (drag and drop) because GTK4 isn't supported by Glade. That being said for GTK4 and python I found a very nice guide right here. Source: almost 2 years ago