Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

JSPM VS Three.js

Compare JSPM VS Three.js and see what are their differences

monday.com
The most intuitive platform to manage projects and teamwork featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

JSPM logo JSPM

Front End Package Manager, Frontend Development, and Javascript

Three.js logo Three.js

A JavaScript 3D library which makes WebGL simpler.
  • JSPM Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-07
  • Three.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-05

JSPM features and specs

  • Modern JavaScript Support
    JSPM provides support for ES modules and modern JavaScript features, allowing developers to use the latest standards in their projects.
  • Dependency Management
    JSPM offers efficient dependency management by automatically resolving and managing package versions, which reduces conflicts and simplifies updates.
  • CDN Integration
    JSPM integrates with CDN services to enable direct module imports from URLs, reducing setup complexity and enhancing performance by leveraging distributed content delivery networks.
  • Ecosystem Compatibility
    JSPM is compatible with npm packages, allowing developers to access a wide range of libraries and tools available in the npm ecosystem.
  • Pluggable Build System
    JSPM includes a pluggable build system that can be customized and extended to suit different workflow requirements and optimizations.

Possible disadvantages of JSPM

  • Learning Curve
    For developers new to JSPM, there might be a steeper learning curve due to its unique features and configurations compared to more traditional package managers.
  • Limited Community Support
    JSPM may have a smaller community compared to established tools like Webpack or Parcel, potentially leading to fewer resources or community-driven plugins.
  • Complexity for Small Projects
    For small or simple projects, JSPM might introduce unnecessary complexity compared to lighter alternatives, which could be more straightforward for basic use cases.
  • Performance Overhead
    Depending on the project setup and usage, there might be some performance overhead during the initial setup or builds, particularly for very large projects.
  • Dependency on External Services
    Relying heavily on external CDNs and services can lead to potential issues if those services experience downtime or changes in policy.

Three.js features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Three.js simplifies the complex task of 3D rendering with an intuitive API, making it accessible to developers who may not have deep expertise in 3D graphics.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Three.js is built upon WebGL, ensuring compatibility across modern browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    The library offers extensive documentation, examples, and an active community, which helps in quickly resolving issues and understanding implementation.
  • Integration with HTML and CSS
    Three.js can be easily integrated with HTML and CSS, allowing for the blending of 2D and 3D elements in web applications.
  • Extensive Features
    It supports a wide range of features including cameras, lights, materials, shaders, and post-processing effects, making it highly versatile for various 3D projects.

Possible disadvantages of Three.js

  • Performance Overhead
    Despite its powerful capabilities, Three.js can have significant performance overhead, especially for complex scenes, which might require optimization.
  • Learning Curve
    While easier than raw WebGL, Three.js still has a learning curve, particularly for those new to 3D graphics, requiring time to become proficient.
  • Limited Built-in Advanced Tools
    Although feature-rich, Three.js lacks some advanced tools out-of-the-box compared to more specialized or industry-standard 3D engines, necessitating custom solutions for certain tasks.
  • Dependency on WebGL
    Three.js relies on WebGL, meaning it cannot be used in environments where WebGL is not supported, which can limit accessibility and compatibility.
  • Frequent Updates
    The library is actively developed, which is generally positive, but frequent updates can mean breaking changes, requiring developers to frequently refactor their code.

JSPM videos

+ Add

JSPM Engineering College Pune Honest Review | Cut-OFF | Placement | Fees | Campus | Student Reviews

More videos:

  • Review - JSPM PUNE | COLLEGE FEE| HOSTEL FEE | PLACEMENT | RANKING | CUT OFF | CAMPUS | JSPM COLLEGE REVIEW
  • Review - JSPM BSIOTR FE Computer students review

Three.js videos

+ Add

Getting Started With Three.js

More videos:

  • Review - Ricardo Cabello (Mr doob) - 5 years of three.js

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to JSPM and Three.js)

JSPM

Three.js

JS Build Tools
100 100%
JS Build Tools
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
Javascript UI Libraries
100% 100
Web Application Bundler
100 100%
Web Application Bundler
0% 0
Flowcharts
0 0%
Flowcharts
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using JSPM and Three.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare JSPM and Three.js

JSPM Reviews

We have no reviews of JSPM yet.
Be the first one to post

Three.js Reviews

Top 20 Javascript Libraries
Cross-browser JS library and API that allows for the creation of beautiful animations, Three.js relies on WebGL rather than conventional browser-plugins. Through its library utilities, developers can include complex 3D animations on their website without much effort. Three.js include many features like geometry, lights, materials, shaders, effects, scenes, data loaders,...
Source: hackr.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Three.js seems to be a lot more popular than JSPM. While we know about 248 links to Three.js, we've tracked only 2 mentions of JSPM. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

JSPM mentions (2)

  • Big Changes Ahead for Deno
    > We've been working on some updates that will allow Deno to easily import npm packages and make the vast majority of npm packages work in Deno within the next three months. This is really huge and will be a huge boost to the Deno ecosystem. On the other hand, I quite enjoyed that it wasn't jacked into NPM. There were reasonable alternatives like https://jspm.org/. This is a big swing at Node and I'll be watching... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
  • 5 More Things I Learned Building Snowpack to 20,000 Stars
    But I really want to make it clear that I'm so incredibly proud of this project and the people who have contributed to it. Snowpack meaningfully pushed the entire web development industry forward, and that's pretty cool. Even if you never use Snowpack directly, the work that we pioneered around npm package handling for ESM is already being built on and improved on across the entire web tooling landscape in... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

Three.js mentions (248)

  • React Three Ecosystem
    Note three.js [1] has nothing to do with React out of the box though, this page highlights an atypical way of using three.js through a popular React binding. [1] https://threejs.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 29 days ago
  • Turn your phone into a wireless Joy-Con with SyncoPath
    The phone in the codepath sample got rendered using Three.js. For fun, I also added some beep sound generated using ZZfx when you tap. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • How to Build a Portfolio Website with React
    Also, to make your portfolio stand out to recruiters and clients, you can add some creative and interactive animations to it. The following libraries can help you easily do this: Framer Motion, tsParticles, and Three.js. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Rant: state of generative AI in code generation.
    In my experience with AI code generation, in visual projects like UI development or JavaScript based animation (using three.js or p5.js) etc. AI tools work pretty well. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • My son (9 yrs old) used plain JavaScript to make a game, and wants your feedback
    After he's done with v2, might I propose... THE GAMEY GAME 3D ?? https://threejs.org/ I started coding at 9 as well (which was a long time ago now), so I was very happy to play and see this today. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing JSPM and Three.js, you can also consider the following products

npm - npm is a package manager for Node.

p5.js - JS library for creating graphic and interactive experiences

Webpack - Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.

PixiJS - Fast and flexible WebGL-based HTML5 game and app development library.

Ender - Frontend Development

Paper.js - Open source vector graphics scripting framework that runs on top of the HTML5 Canvas.

Loading...