Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

JSPM VS Browserify

Compare JSPM VS Browserify and see what are their differences

Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

JSPM logo JSPM

Front End Package Manager, Frontend Development, and Javascript

Browserify logo Browserify

Browserify lets you require('modules') in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies.
  • JSPM Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-07
  • Browserify Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-29

JSPM features and specs

  • Modern JavaScript Support
    JSPM provides support for ES modules and modern JavaScript features, allowing developers to use the latest standards in their projects.
  • Dependency Management
    JSPM offers efficient dependency management by automatically resolving and managing package versions, which reduces conflicts and simplifies updates.
  • CDN Integration
    JSPM integrates with CDN services to enable direct module imports from URLs, reducing setup complexity and enhancing performance by leveraging distributed content delivery networks.
  • Ecosystem Compatibility
    JSPM is compatible with npm packages, allowing developers to access a wide range of libraries and tools available in the npm ecosystem.
  • Pluggable Build System
    JSPM includes a pluggable build system that can be customized and extended to suit different workflow requirements and optimizations.

Possible disadvantages of JSPM

  • Learning Curve
    For developers new to JSPM, there might be a steeper learning curve due to its unique features and configurations compared to more traditional package managers.
  • Limited Community Support
    JSPM may have a smaller community compared to established tools like Webpack or Parcel, potentially leading to fewer resources or community-driven plugins.
  • Complexity for Small Projects
    For small or simple projects, JSPM might introduce unnecessary complexity compared to lighter alternatives, which could be more straightforward for basic use cases.
  • Performance Overhead
    Depending on the project setup and usage, there might be some performance overhead during the initial setup or builds, particularly for very large projects.
  • Dependency on External Services
    Relying heavily on external CDNs and services can lead to potential issues if those services experience downtime or changes in policy.

Browserify features and specs

  • Node.js module system support
    Browserify allows developers to use the Node.js-style require() function for module loading in the browser, enabling the use of NPM packages designed for Node.js.
  • Code organization
    By enabling modular code, Browserify helps developers organize their code better, making it more maintainable and scalable.
  • Ecosystem integration
    Browserify seamlessly integrates with the Node.js ecosystem and encourages code sharing between the server and client.
  • Customizability
    With Browserify's plugin system, developers can easily customize and extend its functionality to fit their needs.
  • Performance optimization
    Advanced features like code splitting and static analysis can improve performance by reducing the amount of code sent to the browser.

Possible disadvantages of Browserify

  • Build process complexity
    Integrating Browserify into your workflow can add complexity to your build process, especially for developers who are not familiar with build tools.
  • Plugins and transformations
    While Browserify is customizable, managing a large number of plugins and transformations can become cumbersome and difficult to understand.
  • Performance overhead
    The bundling process can introduce performance overhead during development due to the time taken to bundle the files.
  • Modern alternatives
    Modern alternatives like Webpack and Rollup offer more features and optimizations, making Browserify less attractive for some use cases.
  • Limited built-in features
    Compared to alternatives like Webpack, Browserify has fewer built-in features, which can necessitate additional tools or plugins for functionalities like hot module replacement.

JSPM videos

+ Add

JSPM Engineering College Pune Honest Review | Cut-OFF | Placement | Fees | Campus | Student Reviews

More videos:

  • Review - JSPM PUNE | COLLEGE FEE| HOSTEL FEE | PLACEMENT | RANKING | CUT OFF | CAMPUS | JSPM COLLEGE REVIEW
  • Review - JSPM BSIOTR FE Computer students review

Browserify videos

+ Add

MacBook Pro Retina vs MacBook Air - Django collect static & browserify

More videos:

  • Review - Atlanta JavaScript Presents Mobile Development with Cordova and Browserify with Roman Shtylman HD

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to JSPM and Browserify)

JSPM

Browserify

JS Build Tools
49 49%
JS Build Tools
51% 51
Front End Package Manager
62 62%
Front End Package Manager
38% 38
Web Application Bundler
42 42%
Web Application Bundler
58% 58
Development
100 100%
Development
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using JSPM and Browserify. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare JSPM and Browserify

JSPM Reviews

We have no reviews of JSPM yet.
Be the first one to post

Browserify Reviews

First impressions with Parcel JS
Heard of Webpack, Rollup or Browserify? They are popular bundlers. If you’ve used one of them, you’ve used a bundler. A bundler does what it says on the tin, bundles your code 📦
Source: codeburst.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Browserify seems to be a lot more popular than JSPM. While we know about 22 links to Browserify, we've tracked only 2 mentions of JSPM. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

JSPM mentions (2)

  • Big Changes Ahead for Deno
    > We've been working on some updates that will allow Deno to easily import npm packages and make the vast majority of npm packages work in Deno within the next three months. This is really huge and will be a huge boost to the Deno ecosystem. On the other hand, I quite enjoyed that it wasn't jacked into NPM. There were reasonable alternatives like https://jspm.org/. This is a big swing at Node and I'll be watching... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • 5 More Things I Learned Building Snowpack to 20,000 Stars
    But I really want to make it clear that I'm so incredibly proud of this project and the people who have contributed to it. Snowpack meaningfully pushed the entire web development industry forward, and that's pretty cool. Even if you never use Snowpack directly, the work that we pioneered around npm package handling for ESM is already being built on and improved on across the entire web tooling landscape in... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

Browserify mentions (22)

  • Node.js: A brief history of cjs, bundlers, and esm
    Npm packages dramatically sped up the productivity of developers by being able to leverage other developers' work. However, it had a major disadvantage: cjs was not compatible with web browsers. To solve this problem, the concept of bundlers was born. Browserify was the first bundler which essentially worked by traversing an entry point and "bundling" all the require()-ed code into a single .js file compatible... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • How to Create a Real-time Public Transportation Schedule App
    Browserify to use node packages in the browser. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • 5 Different Tools to Bundle Node.js Apps
    Browserify is a widely used JavaScript bundler with over 2 million NPM weekly downloads. In addition to Node.js support, allowing developers to use require() statements in the browser is one of its highlighted features. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • JavaScript Module Bundlers and all that Jazz ✨
    This began to change when NPM came in and running npm install became a quick and easy way to install dependencies. Browserify became the first JavaScript bundler. As its documentation says -. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Hack to Run React Application inside Service Worker
    One problem was to run jsDOM as UMD module. But luckly I was able to use browserify to compile jsDOM into UMD. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing JSPM and Browserify, you can also consider the following products

Ender - Frontend Development

Webpack - Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.

RequireJS - RequireJS is a JavaScript file and module loader.

Parcel - Blazing fast, zero configuration web application bundler

rollup.js - Rollup is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into a larger piece such as application.

npm - npm is a package manager for Node.

Loading...