jq VS fzy

I'd you're trying to bring this to a wider audience not already familiar with q, then the name collision with the more widely known jq project is a problem: https://stedolan.github.io/jq/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

First, we need to install jq via the installer available at https://stedolan.github.io/jq/. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

JQ is a lightweight and powerful command-line JSON processor. It's a time-saving tool for manipulating and extracting data from JSON files effortlessly. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago

If you have jq installed you can use it to make the output look nicer. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago

It requires jq for JSON processing and GNU parallel for concurrent searches in the notebooks. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago

> it supports my keystrokes You know that there is basically a standard set, imposed by Windows in about 1986 or something and also supported in GNOME 2, MATE, Xfce, LXDE, etc etc.? I am more interested in if it supports them. I mean, I don't know what your set are, and I am not for a moment saying there's anything wrong with them, but there are standards for this stuff, used heavily by millions of blind... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

I've been mostly using fzy which is written in C. I hope skim's matching algorithm is as good as fzy's…. Source: over 1 year ago

Am I the only one who prefers FZY ? https://github.com/jhawthorn/fzy. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

A while ago there was a post on this sub about a plugin called wilder.nvim which looks absolutely awesome. Wilder seems super configurable and it's README has a bunch of different suggested configurations. However, it is designed to work with both Vim and Neovim, but does have a config for Neovim, but it depends on kinda odd plugins like cpsm (which uses ctrlp.vim) as well as fzy. Source: over 2 years ago