JMeter VS Neoload

Compare JMeter VS Neoload and see what are their differences

PulpMiner

Converts Any Webpage Into Realtime JSON API 🟢 featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

JMeter

Official Twitter account of JMeter, the open source load testing tool by @TheAsf. Code: https://t.co/ADK2A8Pl14. Website: https://t.co/oc0MW2ksea

Neoload

NeoLoad is a load and stress testing tool to measure the performance of web and mobile applications.

Landing page //
2021-09-21

Landing page //
2023-09-12

JMeter

Website: jmeter.apache.org
Pricing URL: -
$ Details

Edit details

Neoload

Website: neotys.com
Pricing URL: Official Neoload Pricing
$ Details: -

Edit details

JMeter features and specs

Open Source
JMeter is free and open-source software, which makes it accessible to a wide range of users and allows for community-driven improvements and support.
Platform Independence
JMeter is written in Java, which allows it to be run on any platform that supports Java, including Windows, Linux, and macOS.
Extensive Protocol Support
JMeter supports a variety of protocols such as HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, SOAP, REST, and more, making it versatile for different types of performance testing.
User-Friendly Interface
JMeter provides a graphical user interface that is relatively easy to use, even for those who may not have extensive programming knowledge.
Strong Community Support
There is a large and active community around JMeter, offering forums, tutorials, and plugins that extend its functionality.
High Level of Customization
JMeter allows for extensive customization through scripting capabilities, enabling complex and highly specific test scenarios.

Possible disadvantages of JMeter

High Resource Consumption
JMeter can be resource-intensive, requiring significant CPU and memory usage, which can be limiting for large-scale tests.
Complex Setup for Advanced Features
While the basic setup is straightforward, configuring JMeter for advanced testing scenarios can be complex and time-consuming.
Limited Real-Browser Testing
JMeter does not provide real-browser testing capabilities, which can limit its effectiveness in simulating real user experiences.
Steep Learning Curve for Beginners
Although the GUI makes simple tests easy to set up, mastering JMeter’s full capabilities can be challenging for new users.
Limited Reporting and Analysis
The reporting and analytical capabilities of JMeter are somewhat limited, often requiring external tools for in-depth analysis.
Single Thread per Virtual User
JMeter uses a separate thread for each virtual user, which can lead to high resource consumption and limit scalability.

Neoload features and specs

User-Friendly Interface
NeoLoad provides an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface that simplifies the process of creating complex load testing scenarios.
Comprehensive Reporting
NeoLoad offers detailed and comprehensive reporting features, allowing users to easily analyze the performance metrics and identify bottlenecks.
Integration Capabilities
The tool easily integrates with a variety of continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) tools, facilitating seamless workflow integration.
Realistic Load Testing
Supports the simulation of realistic user behavior with its advanced scripting features, allowing for accurate performance testing.
Scalability
NeoLoad can simulate a large number of users, making it suitable for testing applications with significant traffic demands.
Cloud Compatibility
Offers cloud compatibility, allowing users to leverage cloud resources for large-scale load testing.

Possible disadvantages of Neoload

Cost
NeoLoad can be expensive, especially for smaller organizations or teams with limited budgets.
Complexity for Beginners
The tool may have a steep learning curve for beginners, particularly for those unfamiliar with load testing tools.
Resource Intensive
NeoLoad can demand significant system resources, which might slow down the testing environment or require more powerful hardware.
Limited Community Support
Compared to some open-source tools, NeoLoad has a smaller community, which can limit peer support and the availability of community-driven resources.
Maintenance
Frequent updates may require additional time and effort for maintenance and adaptation of testing scripts to new versions.

Analysis of JMeter

Overall verdict

JMeter is generally considered a good tool for performance testing, especially for web applications. It offers a good balance between features, flexibility, and usability, making it a reliable choice for developers and testers.

Why this product is good

JMeter is a popular open-source tool used for performance and load testing of web applications. It supports various protocols, is highly extensible with numerous plugins, and allows for robust scripting with its integration of the Groovy language. The tool is also known for its comprehensive GUI, which makes it a suitable choice for testers with varying levels of expertise.

Recommended for

Performance testing professionals looking for an open-source solution.
Development teams that need to perform load testing on web applications.
Organizations that require a tool supporting multiple protocols.
Testers looking for a tool with an active community and extensive documentation.

JMeter videos

+ Add

Load Testing Using JMeter | Performance Testing With JMeter | JMeter Tutorial | Edureka

Neoload videos

+ Add

NeoLoad Feature Demo

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to JMeter and Neoload)

Neoload

Monitoring Tools

100 100%

Monitoring Tools

0% 0

API Tools

0 0%

API Tools

100% 100

Website Testing

86 86%

Website Testing

14% 14

Development

89 89%

Development

11% 11

User comments

Share your experience with using JMeter and Neoload. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare JMeter and Neoload

JMeter Reviews

Top 20 Open Source & Cloud Free Postman Alternatives (2024 Updated)

Apache JMeter is an open-source tool primarily used for performance testing, but it also provides robust capabilities for API testing.

Source: medium.com

Postman Alternatives for API Testing and Monitoring

For API testing, JMeter allows configuring API endpoint details into the test plan. For example, the URL, method (GET, POST, etc.), parameters, headers, and body data if needed. When the test is executed, JMeter sends requests to the API and captures the response. Users can monitor this in real-time and analyze the results.

Source: www.blazemeter.com

15 BEST SoapUI Alternatives (2022 Update)

JMeter is used for functional API testing which includes needed to test an API. This alternative to SoapUI also has features which help to boost the performance of API testing.

Source: www.guru99.com

Neoload Reviews

We have no reviews of Neoload yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, JMeter seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 52 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

JMeter mentions (52)

Mastering Webhook & Event Testing: A Guide
Tools like Apache Benchmark (ab), K6, or JMeter can simulate hundreds or thousands of concurrent webhook deliveries. Start by establishing performance baselines (we recommend sub-second response times), then gradually increase load until performance degrades. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
3 Types of Chaos Experiments and How To Run Them
Use load testing tools like JMeter, Gatling, or Locust to simulate demand spikes and verify that your auto-scaling rules work as expected. This will ensure that your system can handle real-world traffic patterns. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
API Lifecycle Management: Key Strategies for Success
Testing is a critical stage in the API lifecycle, ensuring that the API functions as intended and meets performance requirements. Unit testing, integration testing, and performance testing are essential components of this phase. Tools like Postman and JMeter are widely used for API testing. Postman allows developers to create and run automated tests, while JMeter is ideal for load testing and performance analysis.... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
End-to-End API Testing Guide and Best Practices
Run Performance Tests: Use tools like JMeter to test load, stress, and endurance. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Outgrowing Postgres: How to identify scale problems
Use load testing tools like Apache JMeter, Gatling, or Locust to measure your application's throughput under various loads and compare it to historical data. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

Neoload mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Neoload yet. Tracking of Neoload recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing JMeter and Neoload, you can also consider the following products

WebLOAD - WebLOAD - The most flexible and cost effective software for enterprise load, stress and performance testing, integrated with DevOps processes. Click for details

MultCloud - Multiple Cloud Storage Manager: Migrate, move, sync, copy, backup and transfer cloud files with MultCloud, which supports Dropbox, Box, Google Drive, Mega, OneDrive and FTP, etc.

StresStimulus - Load testing tool for websites and mobile that works with hard-to-test applications.

Koofr - Koofr offers safe EU based cloud storage with 10GB free storage space for life and option to connect multiple cloud accounts (Dropbox, Google Drive, OneDrive). No cookies, no trackers, no ads and no spam.

OctoPerf - OctoPerf is a SaaS load testing solution, based on JMeter.

RapidAPI for Mac - Paw is a REST client for Mac.

StresStimulus vs JMeter

StresStimulus vs Neoload