Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

JMeter VS Headspin

Compare JMeter VS Headspin and see what are their differences

JMeter logo JMeter

Official Twitter account of JMeter, the open source load testing tool by @TheAsf. Code: https://t.co/ADK2A8Pl14. Website: https://t.co/oc0MW2ksea

Headspin logo Headspin

Test your mobile app on different global cell networks
  • JMeter Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-21
  • Headspin Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-16

The HeadSpin platform is an industry first, providing a powerful, easy-to-use solution that enables development, QA, product, and operations teams to accelerate release cycles, build for complex real-world user environments, and know whenever any component of the system degrades or breaks—whether at the code, device, or network layer—anywhere in the world.

Since inception, the platform’s extensive on-prem and cloud-hosted global device infrastructure has been expanded with machine learning-driven performance and quality of experience analytics to proactively test and monitor mobile, web, audio and video applications in real-time.

Headspin

$ Details
paid Free Trial $100.0 / Usage
Platforms
Web Browser Windows Mac OSX

JMeter features and specs

  • Open Source
    JMeter is free and open-source software, which makes it accessible to a wide range of users and allows for community-driven improvements and support.
  • Platform Independence
    JMeter is written in Java, which allows it to be run on any platform that supports Java, including Windows, Linux, and macOS.
  • Extensive Protocol Support
    JMeter supports a variety of protocols such as HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, SOAP, REST, and more, making it versatile for different types of performance testing.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    JMeter provides a graphical user interface that is relatively easy to use, even for those who may not have extensive programming knowledge.
  • Strong Community Support
    There is a large and active community around JMeter, offering forums, tutorials, and plugins that extend its functionality.
  • High Level of Customization
    JMeter allows for extensive customization through scripting capabilities, enabling complex and highly specific test scenarios.

Possible disadvantages of JMeter

  • High Resource Consumption
    JMeter can be resource-intensive, requiring significant CPU and memory usage, which can be limiting for large-scale tests.
  • Complex Setup for Advanced Features
    While the basic setup is straightforward, configuring JMeter for advanced testing scenarios can be complex and time-consuming.
  • Limited Real-Browser Testing
    JMeter does not provide real-browser testing capabilities, which can limit its effectiveness in simulating real user experiences.
  • Steep Learning Curve for Beginners
    Although the GUI makes simple tests easy to set up, mastering JMeter’s full capabilities can be challenging for new users.
  • Limited Reporting and Analysis
    The reporting and analytical capabilities of JMeter are somewhat limited, often requiring external tools for in-depth analysis.
  • Single Thread per Virtual User
    JMeter uses a separate thread for each virtual user, which can lead to high resource consumption and limit scalability.

Headspin features and specs

  • software testing
  • Mobile App Testing
  • Performance Testing
  • Automation Testing

Analysis of JMeter

Overall verdict

  • JMeter is generally considered a good tool for performance testing, especially for web applications. It offers a good balance between features, flexibility, and usability, making it a reliable choice for developers and testers.

Why this product is good

  • JMeter is a popular open-source tool used for performance and load testing of web applications. It supports various protocols, is highly extensible with numerous plugins, and allows for robust scripting with its integration of the Groovy language. The tool is also known for its comprehensive GUI, which makes it a suitable choice for testers with varying levels of expertise.

Recommended for

  • Performance testing professionals looking for an open-source solution.
  • Development teams that need to perform load testing on web applications.
  • Organizations that require a tool supporting multiple protocols.
  • Testers looking for a tool with an active community and extensive documentation.

Analysis of Headspin

Overall verdict

  • Headspin is a good option for companies looking for a versatile and comprehensive mobile and web performance testing platform. Its real-device testing and diverse network simulations provide in-depth insights that are crucial for improving app performance and user experience.

Why this product is good

  • Headspin is reputed for its extensive global device cloud that provides a real-world testing environment. It offers a comprehensive suite of tools for performance monitoring, functional testing, load testing, and user experience analytics. Its capability to test on real devices across various networks and geographical locations is a standout feature, making it a robust solution for ensuring app quality and performance.

Recommended for

    {"QA_teams" => "Quality assurance teams looking for advanced performance analytics and detailed insights will find Headspin’s tools valuable.", "large_enterprises" => "Headspin is well-suited for large enterprises that need to conduct extensive testing across multiple regions and network conditions.", "mobile_app_developers" => "Developers focusing on mobile applications can benefit from Headspin’s real-device testing capabilities.", "businesses_seeking_global_reach" => "Companies that aim to deliver a consistent user experience worldwide can leverage Headspin's network and device diversity."}

JMeter videos

Load Testing Using JMeter | Performance Testing With JMeter | JMeter Tutorial | Edureka

More videos:

  • Review - JMeter 4.0: Introduction to JMeter
  • Review - Stress Testing Using JMeter | Website Stress Testing | Software Testing Training | Edureka

Headspin videos

HeadSpin Digital Experience AI Platform

More videos:

  • Demo - HeadSpin for Telcos
  • Review - HEADSPIN Convertible Light System Review - Everything You Need to Know
  • Review - Headspin V2 Complete BMX Review with Weerachon
  • Demo - Overview of HeadSpin Platform

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to JMeter and Headspin)
Monitoring Tools
85 85%
15% 15
Automated Testing
44 44%
56% 56
Website Testing
66 66%
34% 34
Development
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using JMeter and Headspin. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare JMeter and Headspin

JMeter Reviews

Top 20 Open Source & Cloud Free Postman Alternatives (2024 Updated)
Apache JMeter is an open-source tool primarily used for performance testing, but it also provides robust capabilities for API testing.
Source: medium.com
Postman Alternatives for API Testing and Monitoring
For API testing, JMeter allows configuring API endpoint details into the test plan. For example, the URL, method (GET, POST, etc.), parameters, headers, and body data if needed. When the test is executed, JMeter sends requests to the API and captures the response. Users can monitor this in real-time and analyze the results.
15 BEST SoapUI Alternatives (2022 Update)
JMeter is used for functional API testing which includes needed to test an API. This alternative to SoapUI also has features which help to boost the performance of API testing.
Source: www.guru99.com

Headspin Reviews

  1. EricSeverson
    · Automation QA Tester at Optum ·
    Great platform for testing across multiple devices

    Headspin has been an essential part of our testing process from the beginning. We've used it to test everything from mobile sites to native applications and we've found it to be invaluable for both developers and testers. We can run tests on any device from any location in the world, and the bug reporting feature makes it easy to track down and fix errors.

    👍 Pros:    Performance testing|Cross browser testing|Automation|Mobile app testing|Great customer support
    👎 Cons:    Expensive
  2. Artyom Korolev
    · Sr. QA Analyst at Xcel Energy ·
    Great testing platform

    We use Headspin automation to run our functionality tests across multiple browsers and operating systems. We can identify UI misalignment specific to browsers or failures due to incompatibility with a particular browser. The good part is you can automate screenshots and get insights into where the UI of your website is going off. Then we can use the live feature to identify and debug the compatibility issue. We strongly believe customer experience is the key, and that could impede your product growth. With Headspin, we could see improvements in identifying errors before our customers do!

    👍 Pros:    Cross browser testing|Performance testing|Real device testing|Great customer support
    👎 Cons:    A bit expensive
  3. dinadzousa
    · QA Automation Analyst at EY ·
    HeadSpin Cross Browser Testing tool is a must.

    We have been using HeadSpin for a while now, and we're pleased with their services.

    Their customer support is available 24x7 and they have helped us many times with any issues or questions we had. They are always up to date with the latest version of browsers, which is something we highly value.

    They have a wide selection of browsers and operating systems, which makes it easy for us to identify the issue on our website and solve it in no time.

    👍 Pros:    Cross browser testing|Automated testing|Performance testing

Why choose HeadSpin over BrowserStack?
Another reason why HeadSpin is the best alternative to BrowserStack is artificial intelligence, which when used in testing solutions, extends massive potential. HeadSpin helps in harnessing the potential of AI to analyze the results of performance tests. Its AI-based issue detection engine runs a suite of analytics to identify, quantify, and prioritize issues observed during...
Source: www.headspin.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, JMeter seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 52 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

JMeter mentions (52)

  • Mastering Webhook & Event Testing: A Guide
    Tools like Apache Benchmark (ab), K6, or JMeter can simulate hundreds or thousands of concurrent webhook deliveries. Start by establishing performance baselines (we recommend sub-second response times), then gradually increase load until performance degrades. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • 3 Types of Chaos Experiments and How To Run Them
    Use load testing tools like JMeter, Gatling, or Locust to simulate demand spikes and verify that your auto-scaling rules work as expected. This will ensure that your system can handle real-world traffic patterns. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • API Lifecycle Management: Key Strategies for Success
    Testing is a critical stage in the API lifecycle, ensuring that the API functions as intended and meets performance requirements. Unit testing, integration testing, and performance testing are essential components of this phase. Tools like Postman and JMeter are widely used for API testing. Postman allows developers to create and run automated tests, while JMeter is ideal for load testing and performance analysis.... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • End-to-End API Testing Guide and Best Practices
    Run Performance Tests: Use tools like JMeter to test load, stress, and endurance. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Outgrowing Postgres: How to identify scale problems
    Use load testing tools like Apache JMeter, Gatling, or Locust to measure your application's throughput under various loads and compare it to historical data. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
View more

Headspin mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Headspin yet. Tracking of Headspin recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing JMeter and Headspin, you can also consider the following products

WebLOAD - WebLOAD - The most flexible and cost effective software for enterprise load, stress and performance testing, integrated with DevOps processes. Click for details

BrowserStack - BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

StresStimulus - Load testing tool for websites and mobile that works with hard-to-test applications.

LambdaTest - Perform Web Testing on 2000+ Browsers & OS

OctoPerf - OctoPerf is a SaaS load testing solution, based on JMeter.

Katalon - Built on the top of Selenium and Appium, Katalon Studio is a free and powerful automated testing tool for web testing, mobile testing, and API testing.