Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

JFrog Xray VS OWASP Dependency-Track

Compare JFrog Xray VS OWASP Dependency-Track and see what are their differences

JFrog Xray logo JFrog Xray

JFrog Xray is a universal software composition analysis (SCA) solution that natively integrates with Artifactory

OWASP Dependency-Track logo OWASP Dependency-Track

OWASP Dependency-Track is an intelligent Software Composition Analysis (SCA) platform that allows...
  • JFrog Xray Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-18

Xray is supported on the Cloud (SaaS) platform with an Enterprise X or Enterprise+ license, and on the Self-Hosted platform with a Pro X, Enterprise X , or Enterprise+ license.

  • OWASP Dependency-Track Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-03

JFrog Xray features and specs

  • Deep Security Analysis
    JFrog Xray offers deep security scanning and analysis of all components and dependencies, helping to identify vulnerabilities across various software layers.
  • Integration with CI/CD Pipelines
    It integrates seamlessly with continuous integration and delivery pipelines, which helps automate and enforce security checks during the development process.
  • Comprehensive Artifact Coverage
    Supports a wide variety of artifact types and repositories, providing coverage for numerous formats including Docker, Maven, npm, and more.
  • Flexible and Scalable
    Provides scalable solutions suitable for different sizes of organizations, from small startups to large enterprises, with flexible deployment options.
  • Real-time Alerts and Reports
    Offers real-time alerts and detailed reports on vulnerabilities and compliance issues, which helps teams respond promptly to potential threats.

Possible disadvantages of JFrog Xray

  • Complex Setup
    The initial setup and configuration can be complex, especially for organizations that are not familiar with DevOps tools.
  • Resource Intensive
    JFrog Xray can be resource-intensive, requiring significant computational power and memory, which might be challenging for smaller teams.
  • Cost Considerations
    The cost can be a barrier for some organizations, as it may require significant investment, especially when scaling up.
  • Learning Curve
    There is a learning curve associated with fully leveraging its capabilities, which might require additional training or hiring experienced personnel.
  • Limited Offline Capabilities
    Its functionality is limited when used offline, which might be a disadvantage for organizations with strict offline security policies.

OWASP Dependency-Track features and specs

  • Proactive Vulnerability Management
    Dependency-Track allows organizations to proactively identify and mitigate vulnerabilities in their software dependencies. By continuously monitoring and analyzing the components in use, it helps in preventing potential security breaches before they are exploited.
  • Comprehensive Reporting and Analytics
    The tool provides detailed reports and analytics on the security status of an organization's dependencies. This aids in tracking the risk profile over time, making informed decisions, and prioritizing remediation efforts effectively.
  • Integration with CI/CD Pipelines
    Dependency-Track can be seamlessly integrated into continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines, ensuring that dependencies are automatically assessed for vulnerabilities as part of the software development lifecycle, enhancing security without disrupting development processes.
  • Support for Multiple Package Ecosystems
    Offering support for a wide range of package ecosystems, Dependency-Track can analyze components from various sources, making it versatile and applicable to a broad spectrum of technology stacks used by different organizations.
  • Open Source and Community-Driven
    Being an open-source project, Dependency-Track benefits from community contributions, which enhances its features, security, and reliability over time. It allows users to customize and adapt the tool according to their specific requirements.

Possible disadvantages of OWASP Dependency-Track

  • Complex Setup and Configuration
    The initial setup and configuration of Dependency-Track can be complex and time-consuming, especially for organizations that are new to vulnerability management tools. It may require a steep learning curve for effective use.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running Dependency-Track, particularly in an enterprise environment with many projects and dependencies, can be resource-intensive, requiring significant computational power and storage, which may result in increased operational costs.
  • False Positives and Negatives
    Like many automated security tools, Dependency-Track may occasionally report false positives or fail to identify certain vulnerabilities (false negatives). This necessitates manual verification, which can be time-consuming and might require additional expertise.
  • Dependence on External Data Sources
    Dependency-Track relies on external vulnerability databases and data sources for its analyses (such as the National Vulnerability Database). Any inaccuracies or updates to these data sources can directly affect the accuracy of its vulnerability assessments.
  • Limited Offline Capabilities
    The tool's functionality is somewhat limited in offline environments because it needs access to external vulnerability databases for the most current information, which can restrict its usage in isolated networks or environments with strict internet usage policies.

JFrog Xray videos

JFrog Xray - Universal Artifact Analysis

More videos:

  • Review - [Hands-on Lab]  - Manage Security and Compliance with JFrog Xray
  • Review - Introduction to JFrog Xray

OWASP Dependency-Track videos

No OWASP Dependency-Track videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to JFrog Xray and OWASP Dependency-Track)
Code Analysis
58 58%
42% 42
Security
39 39%
61% 61
Open Source
0 0%
100% 100
Code Coverage
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using JFrog Xray and OWASP Dependency-Track. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, OWASP Dependency-Track should be more popular than JFrog Xray. It has been mentiond 19 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

JFrog Xray mentions (2)

  • LOG4J HAS OFFICIALLY RUINED MY WEEKEND
    I was very thankful for JFrog Xray these past few days. It spotted some embedded cases that wouldn't have shown in a simple dependency graph. Source: over 3 years ago
  • So how's the Log4J vulnerability treating everyone's Friday evening?
    Services that were vulnerable were pretty easily identified with xray. We're really noisy about keeping 3rd party deps up-to-date, so we were able to take full advantage of log4j2.formatMsgNoLookups for like 90% of our services. All of the services involved had config management in place, so it took less than an hour once we had all the service owners in-the-loop to get the quick-fix rolled out everywhere. Bunch... Source: over 3 years ago

OWASP Dependency-Track mentions (19)

  • Show HN: Pre-alpha tool for analyzing spdx SBOMs generated by GitHub
    I've become interested in SBOM recently, and found there were great tools like https://dependencytrack.org/ for CycloneDX SBOMs, but all I have is SPDX SBOMs generated by GitHub. I decided to have a go at writing my own dependency track esque tool aiming to integrate with the APIs GitHub provides. It's pretty limited in functionality so far, but can give a high level summary of the types of licenses your... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • SQL Injection Isn't Dead Yet
    To detect these types of vulnerabilities, we should first and foremost know our dependencies and versions, and which of them have vulnerabilities. The OWASP Top 10 2021 identifies this need as A06:2021-Vulnerable and Outdated Components. OWASP has several tools for this, including Dependency Check and Dependency Track. These tools will warn about the use of components with vulnerabilities. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Krita fund has 0 corporate support
    Https://dependencytrack.org/ You just need to use one of the various tools out there to scan. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Friends - needs help choosing solution for SBOM vulnerability
    OWASP Dependency Track - https://dependencytrack.org/. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • software inventory of my ECS tasks
    I actually want to build the same thing you are after, and I think I’ll go for the setup you describe in idea 2. The tool you can use for this is Trivy (https://trivy.dev), have it generate a SBOM and send it to Dependencytrack (https://dependencytrack.org). Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing JFrog Xray and OWASP Dependency-Track, you can also consider the following products

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

Snyk - Snyk helps you use open source and stay secure. Continuously find and fix vulnerabilities for npm, Maven, NuGet, RubyGems, PyPI and much more.

WhiteSource - Find & fix security and compliance issues in open source libraries in real-time.

FOSSA - Open source license compliance and dependency analysis

FlexNet Code Insight - FlexNet Code Insight is a single integrated solution for open source license compliance and security. Take control of your open source software management

Quick License Manager - Quick License Manager (QLM) is a license protection framework that creates professional and secure license keys to protect software against piracy.