Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

JetBrains TeamCity VS Buildbot

Compare JetBrains TeamCity VS Buildbot and see what are their differences

IsDown.app
Monitor all your cloud services with our status page aggregator. IT teams choose IsDown to monitor all their vendors and get alerts whenever an outage occurs. Integration with Datadog, PagerDuty, Slack, Microsoft Teams, and a lot more. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

JetBrains TeamCity logo JetBrains TeamCity

TeamCity is a continuous integration and build management system.

Buildbot logo Buildbot

Python-based continuous integration testing framework
  • JetBrains TeamCity Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-26
  • Buildbot Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-21

JetBrains TeamCity features and specs

  • Integration Capabilities
    TeamCity offers excellent integration capabilities with various tools including version control systems like Git, Subversion, and Mercurial. It can also integrate with build and test tools, enhancing flexibility.
  • Distributed Build Management
    The platform supports distributed builds, allowing developers to spin up multiple build agents. This improves build efficiency and reduces bottlenecks in the CI/CD pipeline.
  • Comprehensive Reporting
    TeamCity provides comprehensive reporting features that include test history and statistics, helping teams maintain high visibility over the build and testing processes.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The interface is intuitive and user-friendly, allowing new users to easily navigate and set up their projects and builds without requiring extensive training.
  • Extensibility
    TeamCity is highly extensible with a variety of plugins available to extend its functionality, making it adaptable to a wide range of project requirements.

Possible disadvantages of JetBrains TeamCity

  • Complex Configuration
    For large and complex projects, the initial configuration of TeamCity can be quite intricate, requiring significant time and expertise to set up correctly.
  • Resource Intensive
    TeamCity can be resource-intensive, requiring considerable system resources to run efficiently, which can be a constraint for smaller teams or organizations.
  • Licensing Cost
    Though it offers a free tier, the costs associated with its commercial licenses can be high, especially for larger teams or enterprises looking to use advanced features.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    While the interface is user-friendly, mastering all of TeamCity's features can take time, posing a steep learning curve for users who are new to continuous integration tools.
  • Limited Free Version
    The free version of TeamCity has limitations on the number of build configurations and agents, which might not be sufficient for larger projects or teams.

Buildbot features and specs

  • Flexibility
    Buildbot supports a wide range of configurations and is highly adaptable to different environments and workflows.
  • Scalability
    It can handle multiple build processes simultaneously, making it suitable for large-scale continuous integration setups.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, Buildbot is free to use and has a community that can contribute to its development and maintenance.
  • Customizability
    The system allows for extensive customization through Python scripts, enabling users to tailor it to their specific needs.
  • Extensive Documentation
    Buildbot has thorough documentation that helps new users get started and allows advanced users to dive into more complex configurations.

Possible disadvantages of Buildbot

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its flexibility and customization options, new users may find it challenging to set up and configure Buildbot initially.
  • Limited UI
    The user interface is not as polished or user-friendly as some other continuous integration tools, which can impact usability.
  • Dependency Management
    Managing dependencies can be cumbersome, particularly when incorporating different environments and complex workflows.
  • Performance Overhead
    The system can become resource-intensive, particularly with larger and more complex build environments, potentially leading to increased performance overhead.
  • Community Size
    The community, while active, is not as large as some other CI/CD tools, which might limit available support and third-party integrations.

Analysis of Buildbot

Overall verdict

  • Buildbot is a powerful and flexible option for those who need a customizable and robust continuous integration and delivery system. However, its complexity and learning curve may not make it the best choice for smaller teams or projects that require a simpler, out-of-the-box solution.

Why this product is good

  • Buildbot is an open-source framework designed to automate software build, test, and release processes. It is highly customizable and extensible, which makes it suitable for complex and large-scale CI/CD pipelines. It supports a wide range of programming languages and tools, and its flexibility allows it to be tailored to specific project needs. Additionally, since Buildbot is open-source, it benefits from community contributions and support.

Recommended for

    Buildbot is recommended for experienced developers and DevOps teams who require a highly customizable continuous integration/continuous delivery system, particularly in environments where complex and large-scale operations are needed. It is ideal for projects that require unique workflows or integrations that are not supported by more mainstream CI/CD solutions.

JetBrains TeamCity videos

No JetBrains TeamCity videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Buildbot videos

+ Add

Craig Rodrigues - Migrating Python.org to Buildbot 9 and Python 3 - SF Python Meetup

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to JetBrains TeamCity and Buildbot)

JetBrains TeamCity

Buildbot

Continuous Deployment
28 28%
Continuous Deployment
72% 72
Continuous Integration
27 27%
Continuous Integration
73% 73
DevOps Tools
27 27%
DevOps Tools
73% 73
Software Development
49 49%
Software Development
51% 51

User comments

Share your experience with using JetBrains TeamCity and Buildbot. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Buildbot seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

JetBrains TeamCity mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of JetBrains TeamCity yet. Tracking of JetBrains TeamCity recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Buildbot mentions (9)

  • 10 open source tools that platform, SRE and DevOps engineers should consider in 2024.
    Buildbot is a versatile CI framework designed to automate all aspects of the software development cycle, enhancing efficiency and reliability. As an open-source platform, it is highly customizable, allowing teams to tailor the automation process to their specific needs. Buildbot excels in integrating various stages of development, from code integration, testing, to deployment, ensuring a seamless and coherent... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Continuos Integration and C++
    If you want more than the builtin CIs in Github and Gitlab, https://buildbot.net is the way. Source: about 2 years ago
  • What are the open source CI/CD tools for C++ (comparable to Ansible, Jenkins, etc.)?
    If you don't have one already integrated with your source control, buildbot is pretty nice and doesn't force you to use docker like most others. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Why Jenkins?
    Https://buildbot.net/ existed before Jenkins Hudson and was quite well known. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Which is the best CI/CD self-hosted open source tool?
    I have used python based CI tool buildbot which is a great tool but we want to move away from buildbot only because in some scenarios we want to compile low-level microseconds which are in c++ to a different architecture. Buildbot doesn't have such a feature. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing JetBrains TeamCity and Buildbot, you can also consider the following products

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

Travis CI - Simple, flexible, trustworthy CI/CD tools. Join hundreds of thousands who define tests and deployments in minutes, then scale up simply with parallel or multi-environment builds using Travis CI’s precision syntax—all with the developer in mind.

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

Codeship - Codeship is a fast and secure hosted Continuous Delivery platform that scales with your needs.

Drone.io - Continuous Integration For GitHub and Bitbucket That Monitors Your code For Bugs

Buddy - The simplest CI/CD tool ever made, acclaimed by top developers worldwide. It uses delivery pipelines to build, test and deploy software. Pipelines are created with over 100 ready-to-use actions, that can be arranged in any way.

Loading...