JAMS Scheduler VS Azkaban
Compare JAMS Scheduler VS Azkaban and see what are their differences
Transform your IT service delivery with SysAid's seamless automation, ensuring a consistently exceptional experience for all users effortlessly
featured
JAMS Scheduler
Control-M
Stonebranch
ActiveBatch
IBM Workload Automation
Apache Oozie
Resolve
OpCon
Azkaban
Apache Airflow
Luigi
RunDeck
Jenkins
Apache Oozie
StackStorm
Metaflow
JAMS Scheduler AzkabanBased on our record, Azkaban seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Not sure if https://azkaban.github.io/ would fit your use case. Source: almost 2 years ago
I used this once, was pretty nice: https://azkaban.github.io/. Source: almost 2 years ago
Apache Azkaban is a batch workflow job scheduler to help developers run Hadoop jobs. The open-sourced platform “resolves ordering through job dependencies” and offers an intuitive web interface to help users maintain and track workflows. Source: about 2 years ago
Control-M - Control‑M simplifies and automates diverse batch application workloads while reducing failure rates, improving SLAs, and accelerating application deployment.
Apache Airflow - Airflow is a platform to programmaticaly author, schedule and monitor data pipelines.
Stonebranch - Stonebranch builds IT orchestration and automation solutions that transform business IT environments from simple IT task automation into sophisticated, real-time business service automation.
Luigi - Luigi is a Python module that helps you build complex pipelines of batch jobs.
ActiveBatch - Orchestrate the entire tech stack with ActiveBatch Workload Automation & Job Scheduling. Build and manage workflows from one place.
RunDeck - RunDeck is an open source automation service with a web console, command line tools and a WebAPI.