Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

JaCoCo VS CodeFactor.io

Compare JaCoCo VS CodeFactor.io and see what are their differences

JaCoCo logo JaCoCo

JaCoCo is a free Java code coverage library.

CodeFactor.io logo CodeFactor.io

Automated Code Review for GitHub & BitBucket
  • JaCoCo Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-05
  • CodeFactor.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-19

JaCoCo features and specs

  • Comprehensive Coverage Analysis
    JaCoCo provides detailed reporting on code coverage including branch, line, method, and class coverage, helping developers understand the extent of their test coverage.
  • Integration with Build Tools
    JaCoCo easily integrates with popular build automation tools like Maven, Gradle, and Ant, streamlining the process of including coverage analysis in automated builds.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source tool, JaCoCo is free to use and modify, which makes it accessible to a wide range of users and allows for community contributions.
  • IDE Support
    JaCoCo has good support for integration with IDEs like Eclipse, which makes it convenient for developers to use during the development process.
  • Java Agent
    JaCoCo provides a Java agent for instrumenting code on the fly, which allows for on-the-fly coverage reporting without needing to modify the codebase.

Possible disadvantages of JaCoCo

  • Limited Language Support
    JaCoCo is primarily focused on Java and doesn't support other programming languages, which limits its use in polyglot projects.
  • Complex Configuration
    Setting up JaCoCo, especially for large projects or those with complex configurations, can be cumbersome and require a deep understanding of the tool.
  • Performance Overhead
    Running JaCoCo can introduce a performance overhead because of the additional bytecode instrumentation required, which may slow down test execution.
  • Lack of Detailed Documentation
    Users have reported that JaCoCo's documentation can be sparse or outdated, which can make troubleshooting and advanced usage more difficult for new users.
  • Limited Support for Java 8+ Features
    While JaCoCo supports most common Java features, certain newer features introduced in Java 8 and later (like lambda expressions and method references) may not be fully covered or reported incorrectly.

CodeFactor.io features and specs

  • Real-time Code Review
    CodeFactor.io provides immediate feedback on code changes by performing real-time code reviews, which helps catch issues early in the development process.
  • Integration with Popular Platforms
    The platform offers seamless integration with popular version control systems like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, allowing easy adoption into existing workflows.
  • Detailed Reports
    Generates detailed reports with clear metrics and actionable insights on code quality, helping teams understand and improve their codebase.
  • Automated Code Review
    Automates the code review process, saving developers time and ensuring consistency in code quality assessments.
  • Support for Multiple Languages
    Supports a wide range of programming languages, making it versatile for teams working with diverse technology stacks.

Possible disadvantages of CodeFactor.io

  • Limited Free Plan
    The free plan has limitations in terms of features and the number of private repositories it can support, which may not be sufficient for larger teams or projects.
  • False Positives/Negatives
    Like many automated code review tools, CodeFactor.io can sometimes generate false positives or negatives, which might require manual inspection.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users have reported performance issues, such as slow analysis times, especially with very large codebases.
  • Learning Curve
    Although the interface is user-friendly, there can be a learning curve associated with interpreting some of the more detailed metrics and reports.
  • Customization Limitations
    The level of customization in the analysis rules and settings can be limited compared to some other code quality tools, potentially restricting its adaptability to specific team needs.

JaCoCo videos

What is Code Coverage with Jacoco — By DevOpsSchool

More videos:

  • Review - Code Coverage | JaCoCo | Java Code Coverage | Test cases

CodeFactor.io videos

Getting started with CodeFactor.io

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to JaCoCo and CodeFactor.io)
Code Coverage
23 23%
77% 77
Code Analysis
28 28%
72% 72
Code Quality
27 27%
73% 73
Code Review
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using JaCoCo and CodeFactor.io. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing JaCoCo and CodeFactor.io, you can also consider the following products

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

OpenCover - OpenCover is a code coverage tool for .NET

Istanbul - Code Coverage Tool - Istanbul is an all-javascript instrumentation library that tracks statement, branch, and function coverage.

CodeClimate - Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.

cobertura - A code coverage tool for java