Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Istanbul - Code Coverage Tool VS JSCover

Compare Istanbul - Code Coverage Tool VS JSCover and see what are their differences

Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Istanbul - Code Coverage Tool logo Istanbul - Code Coverage Tool

Istanbul is an all-javascript instrumentation library that tracks statement, branch, and function coverage.

JSCover logo JSCover

JSCover is a tool that measures code coverage for JavaScript programs.
  • Istanbul - Code Coverage Tool Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-06
  • JSCover Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-06

Istanbul - Code Coverage Tool features and specs

  • Comprehensive Coverage Reporting
    Istanbul provides detailed coverage reports, including line, statement, function, and branch coverage, which help in identifying untested parts of a codebase.
  • Integration with Build Systems
    It seamlessly integrates with various build systems and CI/CD pipelines, making it easier to include in automated testing environments.
  • Variety of Output Formats
    Istanbul supports multiple output formats such as HTML, JSON, LCOV, and more, allowing flexibility in how coverage data is consumed and visualized.
  • Open Source and Community Supported
    Being an open-source tool, Istanbul benefits from a wide community of developers who contribute to its maintenance and improvement.
  • Wide Language Support
    Originally designed for JavaScript, Istanbul has evolved to support modern JavaScript variants like TypeScript and popular frameworks, making it versatile for different tech stacks.

Possible disadvantages of Istanbul - Code Coverage Tool

  • Performance Overhead
    Instrumenting code for coverage can slow down the execution of tests, especially in large codebases, potentially impacting continuous integration build times.
  • Complexity in Setup
    Initial setup and configuration for projects with custom build processes or less common frameworks can be complex and time-consuming.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    Although Istanbul covers basic code coverage needs, it might lack advanced features present in some paid tools, such as integration with advanced analytics or real-time monitoring.
  • Inconsistent Updates
    As with many open-source projects, updates and bug fixes might not be as frequent or consistent as commercial alternatives, potentially leading to issues with new environment changes.

JSCover features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Istanbul - Code Coverage Tool and JSCover)

Istanbul - Code Coverage Tool

JSCover

Code Coverage
73 73%
Code Coverage
27% 27
Code Analysis
74 74%
Code Analysis
26% 26
Code Quality
66 66%
Code Quality
34% 34
Code Review
72 72%
Code Review
28% 28

User comments

Share your experience with using Istanbul - Code Coverage Tool and JSCover. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Istanbul - Code Coverage Tool and JSCover, you can also consider the following products

JaCoCo - JaCoCo is a free Java code coverage library.

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

SimpleCov - SimpleCov is a code coverage analysis tool for Ruby.

OpenCover - OpenCover is a code coverage tool for .NET

cobertura - A code coverage tool for java

dotCover - JetBrains dotCover is a .NET unit test runner and code coverage tool that integrates with Visual Studio.

Loading...