Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Istanbul - Code Coverage Tool VS Checkmarx

Compare Istanbul - Code Coverage Tool VS Checkmarx and see what are their differences

Istanbul - Code Coverage Tool logo Istanbul - Code Coverage Tool

Istanbul is an all-javascript instrumentation library that tracks statement, branch, and function coverage.

Checkmarx logo Checkmarx

The industry’s most comprehensive AppSec platform, Checkmarx One is fast, accurate, and accelerates your business.
  • Istanbul - Code Coverage Tool Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-06
  • Checkmarx Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-29

Istanbul - Code Coverage Tool features and specs

  • Comprehensive Coverage Reporting
    Istanbul provides detailed coverage reports, including line, statement, function, and branch coverage, which help in identifying untested parts of a codebase.
  • Integration with Build Systems
    It seamlessly integrates with various build systems and CI/CD pipelines, making it easier to include in automated testing environments.
  • Variety of Output Formats
    Istanbul supports multiple output formats such as HTML, JSON, LCOV, and more, allowing flexibility in how coverage data is consumed and visualized.
  • Open Source and Community Supported
    Being an open-source tool, Istanbul benefits from a wide community of developers who contribute to its maintenance and improvement.
  • Wide Language Support
    Originally designed for JavaScript, Istanbul has evolved to support modern JavaScript variants like TypeScript and popular frameworks, making it versatile for different tech stacks.

Possible disadvantages of Istanbul - Code Coverage Tool

  • Performance Overhead
    Instrumenting code for coverage can slow down the execution of tests, especially in large codebases, potentially impacting continuous integration build times.
  • Complexity in Setup
    Initial setup and configuration for projects with custom build processes or less common frameworks can be complex and time-consuming.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    Although Istanbul covers basic code coverage needs, it might lack advanced features present in some paid tools, such as integration with advanced analytics or real-time monitoring.
  • Inconsistent Updates
    As with many open-source projects, updates and bug fixes might not be as frequent or consistent as commercial alternatives, potentially leading to issues with new environment changes.

Checkmarx features and specs

  • Comprehensive Coverage
    Checkmarx provides extensive support for multiple programming languages and frameworks, allowing for a broad range of applications to be scanned.
  • Integration Capabilities
    The platform integrates well with various DevOps tools and CI/CD pipelines, making it easier to incorporate security checks into the software development lifecycle.
  • Customization
    Offers highly customizable rule sets that can be tailored to specific security requirements and coding standards of the organization.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Features an intuitive and easy-to-navigate user interface that allows users to efficiently manage and analyze security vulnerabilities.
  • Scalability
    Designed to scale efficiently, Checkmarx can handle large codebases and multiple projects concurrently without significant performance degradation.
  • Strong Reporting Capabilities
    Provides detailed and actionable reports that help developers and security teams quickly understand and address vulnerabilities.
  • Automation
    Supports automated scanning, which helps reduce manual efforts and accelerates the vulnerability detection process.

Possible disadvantages of Checkmarx

  • Cost
    Checkmarx can be expensive, especially for small to medium-sized organizations with limited budgets for security tools.
  • False Positives
    Although comprehensive, the platform sometimes generates false positives, which can lead to unnecessary work and distractions for development teams.
  • Learning Curve
    New users may face a steep learning curve due to the wide range of features and customization options available.
  • Performance Overhead
    In some cases, scanning large and complex codebases can be time-consuming and resource-intensive, potentially impacting development timelines.
  • Customer Support
    Some users have reported that customer support can be slow to respond and may not always provide satisfactory solutions to issues.
  • Initial Setup
    The initial setup process can be complex and time-consuming, requiring considerable effort to properly configure all settings and integrations.

Analysis of Checkmarx

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Checkmarx is generally regarded as a reliable and effective application security testing solution. Its robust features and proactive approach to identifying and mitigating security risks make it a valuable tool for organizations focused on maintaining a secure software development process.

Why this product is good

  • Checkmarx is considered a good choice for application security due to its comprehensive suite of tools designed to identify vulnerabilities early in the software development lifecycle. It offers features like Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Software Composition Analysis (SCA), and Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST). The platform provides a high level of accuracy, integrates well with various development environments, and supports numerous programming languages. Additionally, Checkmarx is known for its ease of use and detailed reporting capabilities, which help developers quickly address security issues.

Recommended for

  • Companies looking for a comprehensive application security platform.
  • Development teams that need seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines.
  • Organizations that require support for multiple programming languages.
  • Security professionals who prioritize early vulnerability detection and detailed reporting.

Istanbul - Code Coverage Tool videos

No Istanbul - Code Coverage Tool videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Checkmarx videos

Viewing results and understanding security issues via Checkmarx online scanner

More videos:

  • Demo - Checkmarx CxSAST Demonstration
  • Review - Meetups at Checkmarx: An Introduction to API Security
  • Review - Source code review with Checkmarx
  • Review - Checkmarx Results Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Istanbul - Code Coverage Tool and Checkmarx)
Code Coverage
100 100%
0% 0
Code Analysis
10 10%
90% 90
Web Application Security
0 0%
100% 100
Code Quality
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Istanbul - Code Coverage Tool and Checkmarx. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Istanbul - Code Coverage Tool and Checkmarx

Istanbul - Code Coverage Tool Reviews

We have no reviews of Istanbul - Code Coverage Tool yet.
Be the first one to post

Checkmarx Reviews

The Top 11 Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Tools
Why We Picked Checkmarx SAST: We like Checkmarx SAST for its early detection of vulnerabilities, which enables faster and safer code development. Its AI-assisted prioritization of vulnerabilities according to severity and risk helps reduce false positives.
Top 11 SonarQube Alternatives in 2024
Checkmarx is a developer-centric security tool that specializes in secure coding practices and compliance. It helps developers identify and fix security vulnerabilities in their code, ensuring that their applications are secure and compliant with regulatory standards. Checkmarx offers a range of tools and features to help developers build secure applications, including...
Source: www.codeant.ai
The 5 Best SonarQube Alternatives in 2024
While SonarQube offers some security features, Checkmarx provides a more holistic approach to application security, covering a more comprehensive range of security aspects throughout the SDLC. Checkmarx One's consolidation of multiple AppSec tools into a single platform could simplify management and reduce the total cost of ownership compared to using SonarQube alongside...
Source: blog.codacy.com
Ten Best SonarQube alternatives in 2021
CheckMarx has been used to test the programs to rectify vulnerability in the code and try the security lapses. Checkmarx is the software program exposure Platform for the enterprise. It has an impressive Codebashing characteristic that has the threshold over SonarQube. The software tracking-reporting function is good too. The "delta-experiment" function is it's far genuinely...
Source: duecode.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Checkmarx seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Istanbul - Code Coverage Tool mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Istanbul - Code Coverage Tool yet. Tracking of Istanbul - Code Coverage Tool recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Checkmarx mentions (3)

  • Penetration Testing for API Security: Protecting Digital Gateways
    Tools like SonarQube, Checkmarx, or Snyk can automate parts of this process by scanning for known vulnerability patterns. While white box testing may not reflect real-world attack scenarios (as attackers rarely access source code), it provides the most thorough assessment of security posture. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • A Guide to DevSecOps with API Gateway
    Automate security testing: Use tools such as OWASP ZAP, SonarQube, or Checkmarx to automate security testing. This will help you identify security issues early in the development process and reduce the risk of vulnerabilities being introduced into your code. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • 11 Top DevSecOps Tools
    Application Security (AppSec) is the forte of Checkmarx, which is an award-winning AppSec Testing tool that integrates security policies into the DevOps workflow and ensures security across the application lifecycle. Checkmarx scans all your code and provides actionable insights for critical vulnerabilities. Checkmarx also offers developer-friendly AppSec training that makes the transition to DevSecOps more... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Istanbul - Code Coverage Tool and Checkmarx, you can also consider the following products

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

JaCoCo - JaCoCo is a free Java code coverage library.

Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free

OpenCover - OpenCover is a code coverage tool for .NET

Veracode - Veracode's application security software products are simpler and more scalable to increase the resiliency of your application infrastructure.

cobertura - A code coverage tool for java