Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

iperf VS Simple Port Forwarding

Compare iperf VS Simple Port Forwarding and see what are their differences

iperf logo iperf

A TCP, UDP, and SCTP network bandwidth measurement tool

Simple Port Forwarding logo Simple Port Forwarding

Simple Port Forwarding works with WebPages and not directly with your router.
  • iperf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-17
  • Simple Port Forwarding Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-26

iperf features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    iperf is compatible with a variety of operating systems including Windows, Linux, and macOS, making it a versatile tool for network performance testing across different environments.
  • Comprehensive Performance Metrics
    Provides detailed metrics such as bandwidth, jitter, and packet loss, which are essential for in-depth network analysis and troubleshooting.
  • Client-Server Model
    Utilizes a client-server model that allows for measuring the maximum TCP and UDP bandwidth between two endpoints, making it suitable for both local and remote testing.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, iperf allows users to review, modify, and contribute to the codebase, ensuring transparency and fostering community involvement.
  • Customizable Test Parameters
    Allows users to customize tests with various parameters such as port number, buffer size, and test duration, offering flexibility to perform targeted network evaluations.

Possible disadvantages of iperf

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The command-line interface and numerous parameters might be overwhelming for beginners who are not familiar with network testing tools.
  • Limited Graphical Interface
    While powerful in functionality, iperf lacks a native graphical user interface, which could be a disadvantage for users who prefer visual tools over command-line utilities.
  • Resource Consumption
    iperf can consume substantial network resources and CPU power during testing, potentially affecting other applications running on the same network or device.
  • Manual Deployment Required
    Users need to manually deploy iperf on both client and server machines, which may be cumbersome for those looking for out-of-the-box network testing solutions.
  • Security Considerations
    Running iperf in server mode might expose a system to network attacks if not secured properly, necessitating careful consideration of security measures.

Simple Port Forwarding features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    The application provides an easy-to-use interface that simplifies the process of port forwarding, making it accessible to users with limited technical knowledge.
  • Wide Router Compatibility
    Simple Port Forwarding supports a wide range of router models, increasing its utility for diverse users with different hardware setups.
  • Automation Capabilities
    The software can automate the port forwarding process, which saves time and minimizes errors compared to manual configuration.
  • Pre-Configured Port Lists
    It includes a list of pre-configured ports for common applications and games, expediting the setup process for popular software.
  • Backup and Restore Functionality
    Users can create backups of their port configurations and restore them when needed, protecting against data loss or erroneous changes.

Possible disadvantages of Simple Port Forwarding

  • Limited Free Features
    While the application offers a free version, some features are restricted to the paid version, potentially limiting its functionality for those not willing to pay.
  • Dependent on Router Compatibility
    The effectiveness of Simple Port Forwarding is dependent on the specific router model and firmware version, which may not be supported or could face compatibility issues.
  • Potential Security Risks
    Improper configuration of port forwarding can expose the network to security threats, requiring users to have some understanding of network security.
  • Software Maintenance
    The application may require regular updates to stay compatible with new routers and security standards, demanding ongoing maintenance from developers.
  • Windows Only
    Simple Port Forwarding is only available for Windows users, excluding those on macOS or Linux systems from using this tool.

iperf videos

Using Iperf to measure network speed / bandwidth

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How to use iperf to test local network LAN speed in Windows 10
  • Review - [HOWTO] Test My Network Speed?! [iPerf & JPerf]

Simple Port Forwarding videos

No Simple Port Forwarding videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to iperf and Simple Port Forwarding)
Monitoring Tools
75 75%
25% 25
Log Management
77 77%
23% 23
Network & Admin
81 81%
19% 19
Productivity
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using iperf and Simple Port Forwarding. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, iperf seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

iperf mentions (4)

  • Microsoft: Don't Use Iperf3 on Windows
    Just some clarification: IPerf 2 is different from the iperf3 found at https://github.com/esnet/iperf. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Yet Another Bench Script (YABS): evaluate Linux server performance with this simple Bash script and utility
    Network - network throughput (both incoming and outgoing) is tested using iperf3 on several geographically diverse public iperf servers. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Speed testing Visible with a modem
    File transfer using iperf3 over Tailscale. I noticed that the bandwidth to my home computer (on a 500/500 fiber connection) was higher than with speedtest.net. For the first few days I was getting downloads and uploads of 28Mbps (+/- std dev of 6Mbps) and 150ms latency (+/- 35ms). After somewhere around 100GB total transfer (maybe half of that over Tailscale), it is now downloading and uploading at 10Mbps (+/-... Source: over 3 years ago
  • FTP upload speed isn't great
    I can add to this. I have two mini self contained projects to create multiarch static bins of mtr and iperf3 for general usage. Source: about 4 years ago

Simple Port Forwarding mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Simple Port Forwarding yet. Tracking of Simple Port Forwarding recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing iperf and Simple Port Forwarding, you can also consider the following products

JPerf - This project gives a better UI and new functionalities to the initial JPerf 1.

PortMapper - Do you need to map a specific TCP or UDP port on your machine to another port on another machine?

NetIO-GUI - NetIO-GUI is a Windows frontend for the multiplatform commandline utility 'netio'.

socat - socat is a relay for bidirectional data transfer between two independent data channels.

netperf - Netperf is a benchmark that can be used to measure the performance of many different types of networking. It provides tests for both unidirectional throughput, and end-to-end latency. - HewlettPack...

Komodia Relay - Free open source tool to perform TCP based session relay