Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

iperf VS Cyberduck

Compare iperf VS Cyberduck and see what are their differences

Netumo
Ensure healthy website performance, uptime, and free from vulnerabilities. Automatic checks for SSL Certificates, domains and monitor issues with your websites all from one console and get instant notifications on any issues. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

iperf logo iperf

A TCP, UDP, and SCTP network bandwidth measurement tool

Cyberduck logo Cyberduck

A libre FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, S3, Backblaze B2, Azure & OpenStack Swift browser.
  • iperf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-17
  • Cyberduck Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-12

iperf features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    iperf is compatible with a variety of operating systems including Windows, Linux, and macOS, making it a versatile tool for network performance testing across different environments.
  • Comprehensive Performance Metrics
    Provides detailed metrics such as bandwidth, jitter, and packet loss, which are essential for in-depth network analysis and troubleshooting.
  • Client-Server Model
    Utilizes a client-server model that allows for measuring the maximum TCP and UDP bandwidth between two endpoints, making it suitable for both local and remote testing.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, iperf allows users to review, modify, and contribute to the codebase, ensuring transparency and fostering community involvement.
  • Customizable Test Parameters
    Allows users to customize tests with various parameters such as port number, buffer size, and test duration, offering flexibility to perform targeted network evaluations.

Possible disadvantages of iperf

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The command-line interface and numerous parameters might be overwhelming for beginners who are not familiar with network testing tools.
  • Limited Graphical Interface
    While powerful in functionality, iperf lacks a native graphical user interface, which could be a disadvantage for users who prefer visual tools over command-line utilities.
  • Resource Consumption
    iperf can consume substantial network resources and CPU power during testing, potentially affecting other applications running on the same network or device.
  • Manual Deployment Required
    Users need to manually deploy iperf on both client and server machines, which may be cumbersome for those looking for out-of-the-box network testing solutions.
  • Security Considerations
    Running iperf in server mode might expose a system to network attacks if not secured properly, necessitating careful consideration of security measures.

Cyberduck features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Cyberduck features a clean and intuitive interface that makes it easy for users to navigate and manage files across different cloud storage services and servers.
  • Wide Protocol Support
    The software supports a variety of protocols including FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, Amazon S3, OpenStack Swift, and Backblaze B2, making it versatile for different needs.
  • Open Source
    Cyberduck is open-source, which means it is freely available and continuously improved by a community of developers.
  • Integration with External Editors
    Cyberduck allows seamless integration with various external editors, enabling users to edit files directly on the server.
  • Bookmark Management
    The application offers robust bookmark management, allowing users to easily save and organize frequently accessed locations.
  • Strong Security Features
    Cyberduck includes strong security features such as support for SSH keys, two-factor authentication, and encrypted transfers with TLS/SSL.

Possible disadvantages of Cyberduck

  • Performance Issues
    Some users have reported performance issues, such as slow transfer speeds and occasional freezes, especially when handling large files.
  • Resource Intensive
    Cyberduck can be resource-intensive, consuming a considerable amount of system memory and CPU, which can affect the performance of other applications.
  • Limited Support for Automation
    Unlike some other file transfer tools, Cyberduck lacks extensive built-in scripting or automation capabilities, which could be a drawback for power users looking to automate file operations.
  • Complex Initial Setup
    For users who are not familiar with the protocols supported, the initial setup and configuration can be confusing and time-consuming.
  • Occasional Stability Issues
    Some users have experienced occasional stability issues, including unexpected crashes or connection drops during transfers.

iperf videos

+ Add

Using Iperf to measure network speed / bandwidth

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How to use iperf to test local network LAN speed in Windows 10
  • Review - [HOWTO] Test My Network Speed?! [iPerf & JPerf]

Cyberduck videos

+ Add

How to Use Cyberduck FTP Client

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to iperf and Cyberduck)

iperf

Cyberduck

Monitoring Tools
100 100%
Monitoring Tools
0% 0
FTP Client
0 0%
FTP Client
100% 100
Log Management
100 100%
Log Management
0% 0
Cloud Storage
0 0%
Cloud Storage
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using iperf and Cyberduck. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare iperf and Cyberduck

iperf Reviews

We have no reviews of iperf yet.
Be the first one to post

Cyberduck Reviews

10 Best FTP Clients for WordPress Users (Mac and Windows)
Cyberduck doesn’t provide support for Linux, but Mac and Windows users find it rather simple to use and fast for transferring files to and from local and remote locations. Feel free to download the FTP client from the Cyberduck website or you have options for downloads on the Microsoft and Mac App Stores.
Source: kinsta.com
15 Best Rclone Alternatives 2022
Furthermore, Cyberduck integrates with Cryptomator – one of the rclone alternatives mentioned earlier. With the Cryptomator integration, you get access to extra features like filename encryption and file content encryption.
Source: rigorousthemes.com
7 Best FileZilla Alternatives to Use in 2022
Cyberduck offers a clean user interface which is very easy to use. Most of the web developers use Cyberduck FTP client. However, it is recommended for Mac users, which can be accessed for free. Using this app is completely free, and the users can donate to developers if they want to. This program works on Mac as well as Windows OS.
Source: techdator.net
6 FileZilla Alternatives for Safe File Transfers
While managing files can be challenging, searching for files with Cyberduck is easy and viewing them in Quick Look is as simple as pressing the spacebar. Cyberduck is also compatible with external editors, so you can open and edit files in any third-party editor. Whether you prefer TextWrangler, TextEdit, or Sublime Text, you’ll still be able to edit your files.
Source: www.dnsstuff.com
7 FileZilla Alternatives: What Type of FTP Client Are You Looking for?
Users today, like Cyberduck because it has a more modern look and is compatible with cloud services. While it is easy to use, Cyberduck doesn’t leave out the basics like search, resume, and drag & drop file management. Cyberduck is free to download and use, but they do ask for donations to help continue developing and supporting the product.
Source: www.exavault.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Cyberduck seems to be a lot more popular than iperf. While we know about 72 links to Cyberduck, we've tracked only 4 mentions of iperf. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

iperf mentions (4)

  • Microsoft: Don't Use Iperf3 on Windows
    Just some clarification: IPerf 2 is different from the iperf3 found at https://github.com/esnet/iperf. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Yet Another Bench Script (YABS): evaluate Linux server performance with this simple Bash script and utility
    Network - network throughput (both incoming and outgoing) is tested using iperf3 on several geographically diverse public iperf servers. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Speed testing Visible with a modem
    File transfer using iperf3 over Tailscale. I noticed that the bandwidth to my home computer (on a 500/500 fiber connection) was higher than with speedtest.net. For the first few days I was getting downloads and uploads of 28Mbps (+/- std dev of 6Mbps) and 150ms latency (+/- 35ms). After somewhere around 100GB total transfer (maybe half of that over Tailscale), it is now downloading and uploading at 10Mbps (+/-... Source: about 3 years ago
  • FTP upload speed isn't great
    I can add to this. I have two mini self contained projects to create multiarch static bins of mtr and iperf3 for general usage. Source: almost 4 years ago

Cyberduck mentions (72)

  • Use CLI on any OS to read-write your iPhone folders (without cloud or cable)
    The WebDAV server is Class 1 compliant (Basic), compatible with WebDAV clients like Cyberduck, rclone (GUI & CLI, available on macOS, Windows, and Linux), etc. This guide will use Cyberduck, but rclone works too. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Getting Files from Point A to B: A Developer’s Guide to FTP
    Cyberduck: Nice macOS support, also handles SFTP. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Show HN: DrawDB – open-source online database diagram editor (a retro)
    Or could they just reach out to contributors and ask them to help? Or here’s another route: sell “licenses” regardless of the actual license. I think https://cyberduck.io/ has this: you can donate and get a key that removes the donation nag. You can’t go after the pirates, but would you really want to spend your time on that? (Of course, I would still reach out to the contributors first, explain the situation and... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • VSCode's SSH Agent Is Bananas
    > I distinctly remember seeing some program that was named something duck-related but for the life of me I can't remember any other specifics cyberduck - https://cyberduck.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Supabase Storage: now supports the S3 protocol
    Cyberduck: a cloud storage browser for Mac and Windows. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing iperf and Cyberduck, you can also consider the following products

JPerf - This project gives a better UI and new functionalities to the initial JPerf 1.

FileZilla - FileZilla is an FTP, or file transfer protocol, client. It lets individuals transfer single files or batches to a web server. For many years, FTP was the standard for website design. Read more about FileZilla.

netperf - Netperf is a benchmark that can be used to measure the performance of many different types of networking. It provides tests for both unidirectional throughput, and end-to-end latency. - HewlettPack...

WinSCP - WinSCP is an open source free SFTP client and FTP client for Windows.

TamoSoft Throughput Test - TamoSoft Throughput Test is a utility for testing the performance of a wireless or wired network.

Transmit - Transmit is an FTP client for Mac OS X and Mac OS Classic (which is unsupported).

Loading...