Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Make.com VS Kafka

Compare Make.com VS Kafka and see what are their differences

Cyclr
Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Make.com logo Make.com

Tool for workflow automation (Former Integromat)

Kafka logo Kafka

Apache Kafka is publish-subscribe messaging rethought as a distributed commit log.
  • Make.com Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-05
  • Kafka Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-24

Make.com features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Make.com offers a user-friendly interface with drag-and-drop functionality, making it accessible for non-technical users.
  • Integration Options
    The platform supports a wide array of integrations with popular apps and services, enabling complex workflows.
  • Custom Workflows
    Users can create highly customized workflows tailored to specific business needs, allowing for greater flexibility.
  • Scalability
    Make.com is built to handle both small-scale and enterprise-level tasks, providing a scalable solution as your business grows.
  • Community and Support
    There is an active community and comprehensive support, including documentation and forums, to help users troubleshoot and optimize their usage.
  • Real-time Monitoring and Analytics
    The platform offers real-time monitoring and analytics, allowing users to track the performance of their workflows and make data-driven decisions.
  • Versatile Triggers and Actions
    Make.com offers a variety of triggers and actions that can be used to automate a wide range of tasks across different services.

Possible disadvantages of Make.com

  • Pricing
    The pricing structure can be expensive for small businesses or individual users, especially for advanced features and high-volume usage.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly design, there is still a learning curve for newcomers to understand all the capabilities and features.
  • Occasional Bugs
    Users have reported occasional bugs and issues, which can disrupt workflows and require troubleshooting.
  • Limited Offline Support
    Make.com heavily relies on internet connectivity, which can be a drawback for users requiring offline functionality.
  • Complexity for Advanced Features
    While basic workflows are easy to set up, leveraging more advanced features may require a deeper understanding of the platform and potentially some coding knowledge.
  • Dependency on Third-party Services
    The platform’s effectiveness is influenced by the reliability and performance of third-party services it integrates with, making it susceptible to external issues.
  • Data Privacy Concerns
    Storing and processing data through third-party services may raise privacy and compliance issues for businesses dealing with sensitive information.

Kafka features and specs

  • High Throughput
    Apache Kafka is capable of handling a large volume of data with very low latency, making it ideal for real-time data processing applications.
  • Scalability
    Kafka can effortlessly scale out by adding more brokers to a cluster, allowing it to handle increased data loads.
  • Fault Tolerance
    Kafka offers built-in replication and fault tolerance, ensuring that data is not lost even if some brokers or nodes fail.
  • Durability
    Messages in Kafka are persistently stored on disk, providing durability and data recovery capabilities in case of failures.
  • Stream Processing
    Kafka, along with Kafka Streams, offers powerful stream processing capabilities, allowing real-time data transformation and processing.
  • Ecosystem
    Kafka has a rich ecosystem that includes Kafka Connect for data integration, Kafka Streams for stream processing, and many other tools that make it easier to work with data.
  • Language Support
    Kafka clients are available in multiple programming languages, providing flexibility in choosing the technology stack for your project.

Possible disadvantages of Kafka

  • Complexity
    Setting up and managing a Kafka cluster can be complex, requiring expertise in distributed systems and careful configuration.
  • Resource Intensive
    Kafka can be resource-intensive, requiring significant memory and CPU resources, especially at scale.
  • Operational Overhead
    Maintaining Kafka clusters involves considerable operational overhead, including monitoring, tuning, and managing brokers and partitions.
  • Data Ordering
    While Kafka guarantees ordering within a partition, maintaining total order across a topic with multiple partitions can be challenging.
  • Latency
    In certain use-cases, such as strict low-latency requirements, Kafka’s design might introduce higher latency as compared to some specialized messaging systems.
  • Learning Curve
    Kafka has a steep learning curve, which might make it harder for new developers to get started quickly.
  • Data Storage
    Despite Kafka’s durability features, large volumes of data storage can become costly and need careful management to avoid sluggish performance.

Analysis of Make.com

Overall verdict

  • Overall, Make.com is considered a good platform for those looking to streamline processes and improve efficiency through automation. Its flexible and powerful features cater to a wide range of needs, although there may be a learning curve for those new to automation or with limited technical knowledge.

Why this product is good

  • Make.com, formerly known as Integromat, is a popular platform for automating workflows and integrating various software tools. It offers a visual interface that allows users to connect different applications and automate repetitive tasks, enhancing productivity. Its ability to create complex multi-step automations with various conditions and triggers makes it a robust tool for both small businesses and larger enterprises.

Recommended for

  • small business owners
  • project managers
  • IT professionals
  • digital marketers
  • anyone looking to automate tasks without extensive coding knowledge

Analysis of Kafka

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Kafka is often considered a good choice for organizations needing robust, scalable, and fault-tolerant solutions for handling streaming data and real-time analytics. Its widespread adoption and active open-source community provide a wealth of resources and support for users.

Why this product is good

  • Apache Kafka is renowned for its high-throughput, low-latency platform for handling real-time data feeds. It excels in use cases like real-time data processing, event sourcing, and log aggregation due to its scalability, fault tolerance, and ability to handle large volumes of data with minimal delay. Kafka's distributed architecture allows it to maintain a high degree of availability and fault-tolerance, making it ideal for mission-critical applications.

Recommended for

  • Organizations requiring real-time data processing capabilities
  • Businesses seeking a reliable and scalable event streaming platform
  • Developers implementing event-driven architectures
  • Companies needing to perform log aggregation and real-time monitoring
  • Teams focusing on building systems with fault tolerance and high availability

Make.com videos

+ Add

Zapier vs Integromat - Quick Comparison Review

More videos:

  • Review - Integromat feature tour
  • Review - Introduction to Integromat

Kafka videos

+ Add

Franz Kafka - In The Penal Colony BOOK REVIEW

More videos:

  • Review - LITERATURE: Franz Kafka
  • Review - The Trial (Franz Kafka) – Thug Notes Summary & Analysis

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Make.com and Kafka)

Make.com

Kafka

Automation
100 100%
Automation
0% 0
Log Management
0 0%
Log Management
100% 100
Web Service Automation
100 100%
Web Service Automation
0% 0
Backend Development
0 0%
Backend Development
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Make.com and Kafka. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Make.com and Kafka

Make.com Reviews

The Best n8n.io Alternatives for Workflow Automation in 2025
Make, formerly known as Integromat, is a versatile no-code platform that enables users to create sophisticated workflows with ease. It offers a visual workflow builder that allows users to connect various applications and services, define conditional logic, and manipulate data without writing any code. Make's strengths lie in its ability to handle complex workflows and its...
Source: latenode.com
N8n.io Alternatives
One of the standout features of Integromat is its flexibility and customization options. Users can set up multi-step workflows with conditional logic, ensuring that each automation is tailored to their specific needs. Additionally, Integromat offers advanced error handling and data manipulation capabilities, providing robust solutions for complex automation requirements. For...
Source: apix-drive.com
The Best MuleSoft Alternatives [2024]
Make (formerly Integromat) is an integration solution that allows you to automate and connect applications, databases, web services, chatbots, and other systems.
Source: exalate.com
Top 9 MuleSoft Alternatives & Competitors in 2024
Make, one of the best Mulesoft alternatives, the ultimate IT process automation tool for enhancing efficiency, productivity, and collaboration. By automating routine tasks, integrating with existing infrastructure, and offering powerful workflow automation, Make empowers your team to streamline processes and achieve remarkable results.
Source: www.zluri.com
Zapier vs. Make.com: Which Automation Tool Will Take the Business Lead?
Make.com offers a cost-effective option for those looking for a business process automation solution, even if it may compromise usability and integration. From your scenario, Make.com seems like a realistic alternative for those with a more limited budget or those willing to work with additional API documentation and webhooks instead of the broader integration that Zapier...
Source: www.listproductsreview.com

Kafka Reviews

6 Best Kafka Alternatives: 2022’s Must-know List
In this article, you learned about Kafka, its features, and some top Kafka Alternatives. Even though Kafka is widely used, the technology segment has advanced to the point where other options can overshadow Kafka’s cons. There are various options available for choosing a stream processing solution. Organizations are increasingly embracing event-driven architectures powered...
Source: hevodata.com

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Make.com and Kafka, you can also consider the following products

Zapier - Connect the apps you use everyday to automate your work and be more productive. 1000+ apps and easy integrations - get started in minutes.

Sentry.io - From error tracking to performance monitoring, developers can see what actually matters, solve quicker, and learn continuously about their applications - from the frontend to the backend.

ifttt - IFTTT puts the internet to work for you. Create simple connections between the products you use every day.

Raygun - Raygun gives developers meaningful insights into problems affecting their applications. Discover issues - Understand the problem - Fix things faster.

n8n.io - Free and open fair-code licensed node based Workflow Automation Tool. Easily automate tasks across different services.

Snare - Snare is well known historically as a leader in the event log space.

Loading...