Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Make.com VS AWS CodePipeline

Compare Make.com VS AWS CodePipeline and see what are their differences

Flowlu
All-in-one work management platform for team collaboration. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Make.com logo Make.com

Tool for workflow automation (Former Integromat)

AWS CodePipeline logo AWS CodePipeline

Continuous delivery service for fast and reliable application updates
  • Make.com Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-05
  • AWS CodePipeline Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-25

Make.com features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Make.com offers a user-friendly interface with drag-and-drop functionality, making it accessible for non-technical users.
  • Integration Options
    The platform supports a wide array of integrations with popular apps and services, enabling complex workflows.
  • Custom Workflows
    Users can create highly customized workflows tailored to specific business needs, allowing for greater flexibility.
  • Scalability
    Make.com is built to handle both small-scale and enterprise-level tasks, providing a scalable solution as your business grows.
  • Community and Support
    There is an active community and comprehensive support, including documentation and forums, to help users troubleshoot and optimize their usage.
  • Real-time Monitoring and Analytics
    The platform offers real-time monitoring and analytics, allowing users to track the performance of their workflows and make data-driven decisions.
  • Versatile Triggers and Actions
    Make.com offers a variety of triggers and actions that can be used to automate a wide range of tasks across different services.

Possible disadvantages of Make.com

  • Pricing
    The pricing structure can be expensive for small businesses or individual users, especially for advanced features and high-volume usage.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly design, there is still a learning curve for newcomers to understand all the capabilities and features.
  • Occasional Bugs
    Users have reported occasional bugs and issues, which can disrupt workflows and require troubleshooting.
  • Limited Offline Support
    Make.com heavily relies on internet connectivity, which can be a drawback for users requiring offline functionality.
  • Complexity for Advanced Features
    While basic workflows are easy to set up, leveraging more advanced features may require a deeper understanding of the platform and potentially some coding knowledge.
  • Dependency on Third-party Services
    The platform’s effectiveness is influenced by the reliability and performance of third-party services it integrates with, making it susceptible to external issues.
  • Data Privacy Concerns
    Storing and processing data through third-party services may raise privacy and compliance issues for businesses dealing with sensitive information.

AWS CodePipeline features and specs

  • Integration with AWS Services
    AWS CodePipeline seamlessly integrates with other AWS services like CodeCommit, CodeBuild, and CodeDeploy, enabling a smooth and coordinated CI/CD process.
  • Scalability
    AWS CodePipeline automatically scales with your development workflows, offering the scalability needed to handle varying workloads without manual intervention.
  • Automated Workflow
    CodePipeline allows for the creation of automated, repeatable workflows for building, testing, and deploying code, which reduces human error and increases efficiency.
  • Pay-As-You-Go Pricing
    The pricing model is pay-as-you-go, so you only pay for what you use, making it cost-effective for businesses of all sizes.
  • Built-In Security
    AWS CodePipeline offers built-in security features such as AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) roles, ensuring that your CI/CD process adheres to best security practices.

Possible disadvantages of AWS CodePipeline

  • Learning Curve
    For those who are not familiar with AWS services, there can be a considerable learning curve to effectively utilize AWS CodePipeline.
  • Limited Customization
    While the service covers many use cases, it may offer limited customization options for highly specific or complex CI/CD workflows compared to other third-party tools.
  • Service Dependency
    Heavily relying on AWS CodePipeline ties your deployment pipeline to AWS, which can be limiting if you plan to use multi-cloud environments.
  • Latency Issues
    Latency can occur when connecting with external repositories or third-party tools, impacting the speed of the deployment pipeline.
  • Costs for High Usage
    While the pay-as-you-go model is cost-effective for many use cases, high-frequency usage can lead to significant costs over time, especially for large-scale enterprises.

Make.com videos

+ Add

Zapier vs Integromat - Quick Comparison Review

More videos:

  • Review - Integromat feature tour
  • Review - Introduction to Integromat

AWS CodePipeline videos

+ Add

AWS CodePipeline tutorial | Build a CI/CD Pipeline on AWS

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to AWS CodePipeline - Continuous Delivery on Amazon Web Services
  • Review - AWS CodePipeline | AWS CodeDeploy | AWS CodeBuild | CodeCommit | Deploy WebApp a Hands on Lab
  • Review - Streamline Your Software Release Process Using AWS CodePipeline

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Make.com and AWS CodePipeline)

Make.com

AWS CodePipeline

Automation
100 100%
Automation
0% 0
Continuous Integration
0 0%
Continuous Integration
100% 100
Web Service Automation
100 100%
Web Service Automation
0% 0
DevOps Tools
0 0%
DevOps Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Make.com and AWS CodePipeline. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Make.com and AWS CodePipeline

Make.com Reviews

The Best n8n.io Alternatives for Workflow Automation in 2025
Make, formerly known as Integromat, is a versatile no-code platform that enables users to create sophisticated workflows with ease. It offers a visual workflow builder that allows users to connect various applications and services, define conditional logic, and manipulate data without writing any code. Make's strengths lie in its ability to handle complex workflows and its...
Source: latenode.com
N8n.io Alternatives
One of the standout features of Integromat is its flexibility and customization options. Users can set up multi-step workflows with conditional logic, ensuring that each automation is tailored to their specific needs. Additionally, Integromat offers advanced error handling and data manipulation capabilities, providing robust solutions for complex automation requirements. For...
Source: apix-drive.com
The Best MuleSoft Alternatives [2024]
Make (formerly Integromat) is an integration solution that allows you to automate and connect applications, databases, web services, chatbots, and other systems.
Source: exalate.com
Top 9 MuleSoft Alternatives & Competitors in 2024
Make, one of the best Mulesoft alternatives, the ultimate IT process automation tool for enhancing efficiency, productivity, and collaboration. By automating routine tasks, integrating with existing infrastructure, and offering powerful workflow automation, Make empowers your team to streamline processes and achieve remarkable results.
Source: www.zluri.com
Zapier vs. Make.com: Which Automation Tool Will Take the Business Lead?
Make.com offers a cost-effective option for those looking for a business process automation solution, even if it may compromise usability and integration. From your scenario, Make.com seems like a realistic alternative for those with a more limited budget or those willing to work with additional API documentation and webhooks instead of the broader integration that Zapier...
Source: www.listproductsreview.com

AWS CodePipeline Reviews

The Best Alternatives to Jenkins for Developers
AWS CodePipeline is a continuous integration and continuous delivery service that easily and quickly automates your release pipelines for updates. Every time you change the code, AWS CodePipeline will build, test, and deploy your application. Also, it can be easily integrated with GitHub.
Source: www.lambdatest.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AWS CodePipeline seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 29 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Make.com mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Make.com yet. Tracking of Make.com recommendations started around Mar 2021.

AWS CodePipeline mentions (29)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Make.com and AWS CodePipeline, you can also consider the following products

Zapier - Connect the apps you use everyday to automate your work and be more productive. 1000+ apps and easy integrations - get started in minutes.

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

ifttt - IFTTT puts the internet to work for you. Create simple connections between the products you use every day.

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

n8n.io - Free and open fair-code licensed node based Workflow Automation Tool. Easily automate tasks across different services.

Travis CI - Simple, flexible, trustworthy CI/CD tools. Join hundreds of thousands who define tests and deployments in minutes, then scale up simply with parallel or multi-environment builds using Travis CI’s precision syntax—all with the developer in mind.

Loading...