Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Make.com VS AWS CodeBuild

Compare Make.com VS AWS CodeBuild and see what are their differences

Flowlu
All-in-one work management platform for team collaboration. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Make.com logo Make.com

Tool for workflow automation (Former Integromat)

AWS CodeBuild logo AWS CodeBuild

Online shopping from the earth's biggest selection of books, magazines, music, DVDs, videos, electronics, computers, software, apparel & accessories, shoes, jewelry, tools & hardware, housewares, furniture, sporting goods, beauty & personal care, br…
  • Make.com Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-05
  • AWS CodeBuild Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-19

Make.com features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Make.com offers a user-friendly interface with drag-and-drop functionality, making it accessible for non-technical users.
  • Integration Options
    The platform supports a wide array of integrations with popular apps and services, enabling complex workflows.
  • Custom Workflows
    Users can create highly customized workflows tailored to specific business needs, allowing for greater flexibility.
  • Scalability
    Make.com is built to handle both small-scale and enterprise-level tasks, providing a scalable solution as your business grows.
  • Community and Support
    There is an active community and comprehensive support, including documentation and forums, to help users troubleshoot and optimize their usage.
  • Real-time Monitoring and Analytics
    The platform offers real-time monitoring and analytics, allowing users to track the performance of their workflows and make data-driven decisions.
  • Versatile Triggers and Actions
    Make.com offers a variety of triggers and actions that can be used to automate a wide range of tasks across different services.

Possible disadvantages of Make.com

  • Pricing
    The pricing structure can be expensive for small businesses or individual users, especially for advanced features and high-volume usage.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly design, there is still a learning curve for newcomers to understand all the capabilities and features.
  • Occasional Bugs
    Users have reported occasional bugs and issues, which can disrupt workflows and require troubleshooting.
  • Limited Offline Support
    Make.com heavily relies on internet connectivity, which can be a drawback for users requiring offline functionality.
  • Complexity for Advanced Features
    While basic workflows are easy to set up, leveraging more advanced features may require a deeper understanding of the platform and potentially some coding knowledge.
  • Dependency on Third-party Services
    The platform’s effectiveness is influenced by the reliability and performance of third-party services it integrates with, making it susceptible to external issues.
  • Data Privacy Concerns
    Storing and processing data through third-party services may raise privacy and compliance issues for businesses dealing with sensitive information.

AWS CodeBuild features and specs

  • Fully Managed
    AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed continuous integration service. Users do not need to worry about provisioning, managing, and scaling their own build servers.
  • Scalability
    CodeBuild automatically scales up and down to meet the demands of your build process, ensuring that builds are completed quickly without manual intervention.
  • Pay-as-You-Go Pricing
    Users only pay for the compute time they consume with CodeBuild, making it a cost-effective solution for many developer teams.
  • Integration with AWS Services
    CodeBuild integrates seamlessly with other AWS services like S3, EC2, and CloudWatch, providing a cohesive environment for your development and deployment pipelines.
  • Custom Environment Support
    Users can define their own build environments with custom Docker images, providing flexibility to meet specific build requirements.

Possible disadvantages of AWS CodeBuild

  • Complex Setup for Beginners
    Setting up projects in CodeBuild can be complex for users who are new to AWS or continuous integration services.
  • Limited Local Testing
    Unlike some CI tools, AWS CodeBuild provides limited options for running builds locally before pushing changes, which can hinder testing processes.
  • Learning Curve
    Users unfamiliar with AWS services may face a steep learning curve when first using CodeBuild as it involves understanding several AWS concepts and configurations.
  • Potential Costs at Scale
    While the pay-as-you-go model is cost-effective for small workloads, costs can accumulate significantly as usage scales up if not managed carefully.
  • Configuration Management
    Managing build spec files and environment configurations can become complex, especially in projects with many different build processes.

Make.com videos

+ Add

Zapier vs Integromat - Quick Comparison Review

More videos:

  • Review - Integromat feature tour
  • Review - Introduction to Integromat

AWS CodeBuild videos

+ Add

AWS CodeBuild Tutorial

More videos:

  • Review - AWS CodeBuild Overview
  • Review - All the AWS CodeBuild You Can Stomach in 45 Minutes

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Make.com and AWS CodeBuild)

Make.com

AWS CodeBuild

Automation
100 100%
Automation
0% 0
Continuous Integration
0 0%
Continuous Integration
100% 100
Web Service Automation
100 100%
Web Service Automation
0% 0
DevOps Tools
0 0%
DevOps Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Make.com and AWS CodeBuild. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Make.com and AWS CodeBuild

Make.com Reviews

The Best n8n.io Alternatives for Workflow Automation in 2025
Make, formerly known as Integromat, is a versatile no-code platform that enables users to create sophisticated workflows with ease. It offers a visual workflow builder that allows users to connect various applications and services, define conditional logic, and manipulate data without writing any code. Make's strengths lie in its ability to handle complex workflows and its...
Source: latenode.com
N8n.io Alternatives
One of the standout features of Integromat is its flexibility and customization options. Users can set up multi-step workflows with conditional logic, ensuring that each automation is tailored to their specific needs. Additionally, Integromat offers advanced error handling and data manipulation capabilities, providing robust solutions for complex automation requirements. For...
Source: apix-drive.com
The Best MuleSoft Alternatives [2024]
Make (formerly Integromat) is an integration solution that allows you to automate and connect applications, databases, web services, chatbots, and other systems.
Source: exalate.com
Top 9 MuleSoft Alternatives & Competitors in 2024
Make, one of the best Mulesoft alternatives, the ultimate IT process automation tool for enhancing efficiency, productivity, and collaboration. By automating routine tasks, integrating with existing infrastructure, and offering powerful workflow automation, Make empowers your team to streamline processes and achieve remarkable results.
Source: www.zluri.com
Zapier vs. Make.com: Which Automation Tool Will Take the Business Lead?
Make.com offers a cost-effective option for those looking for a business process automation solution, even if it may compromise usability and integration. From your scenario, Make.com seems like a realistic alternative for those with a more limited budget or those willing to work with additional API documentation and webhooks instead of the broader integration that Zapier...
Source: www.listproductsreview.com

AWS CodeBuild Reviews

We have no reviews of AWS CodeBuild yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AWS CodeBuild seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 13 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Make.com mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Make.com yet. Tracking of Make.com recommendations started around Mar 2021.

AWS CodeBuild mentions (13)

  • Low Cost "Overkill" AWS Infrastructure for a Newborn Startup
    Therefore, I used AWS Codebuild and AWS CodePipeline to automate the steps of building and deploying the services. The diagram below depicts all the steps required to continuously deliver the frontend and backend applications:. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • How CodeCatalyst compares to other AWS Services related to Development and CI/CD processes
    We treat these services in one  group as they belong together from a strategic point of view. They have been around for a few years and the teams that built these are now involved in CodeCatalyst. CodeCatalyst partly uses them “under the hood”. CodeCommit is a managed git hosting, CodeBuild is a managed “build” system, CodeStar is a “project management” tool. CodePipeline allows combining multiple CodeBuild steps... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Well-Architected Review - Part II - Operational Excellence
    Design for Operations You should implement your entire workload as code. The benefit is that you can apply the same engineering discipline that you use for application code to your infrastructure. Use version control system like AWS Codecommit to enable tracking of changes and releases, and use AWS Cloudformation for your infrastructure templates. It is recommendable to test and validate changes to help limit... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • DevSecOps with AWS - Multi Environment deployments - Part 2
    AWS CodeBuild: fully managed continuous integration service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • DEVOPS AS A SERVICE
    AWS CodeBuild is a completely managed service for compiling code, testing quality assurance using automated procedures, and generating software ready for deployment. CodeBuild is incredibly secure, as each client receives a unique set of encryption keys to include in each created artifact. Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Make.com and AWS CodeBuild, you can also consider the following products

Zapier - Connect the apps you use everyday to automate your work and be more productive. 1000+ apps and easy integrations - get started in minutes.

AWS CodePipeline - Continuous delivery service for fast and reliable application updates

ifttt - IFTTT puts the internet to work for you. Create simple connections between the products you use every day.

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

n8n.io - Free and open fair-code licensed node based Workflow Automation Tool. Easily automate tasks across different services.

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

Loading...