Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Make.com VS Actionsflow

Compare Make.com VS Actionsflow and see what are their differences

Make.com logo Make.com

Tool for workflow automation (Former Integromat)

Actionsflow logo Actionsflow

Free Zapier alternative based on Github Actions
  • Make.com Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-05
  • Actionsflow Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-10-01

Make.com features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Make.com offers a user-friendly interface with drag-and-drop functionality, making it accessible for non-technical users.
  • Integration Options
    The platform supports a wide array of integrations with popular apps and services, enabling complex workflows.
  • Custom Workflows
    Users can create highly customized workflows tailored to specific business needs, allowing for greater flexibility.
  • Scalability
    Make.com is built to handle both small-scale and enterprise-level tasks, providing a scalable solution as your business grows.
  • Community and Support
    There is an active community and comprehensive support, including documentation and forums, to help users troubleshoot and optimize their usage.
  • Real-time Monitoring and Analytics
    The platform offers real-time monitoring and analytics, allowing users to track the performance of their workflows and make data-driven decisions.
  • Versatile Triggers and Actions
    Make.com offers a variety of triggers and actions that can be used to automate a wide range of tasks across different services.

Possible disadvantages of Make.com

  • Pricing
    The pricing structure can be expensive for small businesses or individual users, especially for advanced features and high-volume usage.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly design, there is still a learning curve for newcomers to understand all the capabilities and features.
  • Occasional Bugs
    Users have reported occasional bugs and issues, which can disrupt workflows and require troubleshooting.
  • Limited Offline Support
    Make.com heavily relies on internet connectivity, which can be a drawback for users requiring offline functionality.
  • Complexity for Advanced Features
    While basic workflows are easy to set up, leveraging more advanced features may require a deeper understanding of the platform and potentially some coding knowledge.
  • Dependency on Third-party Services
    The platform’s effectiveness is influenced by the reliability and performance of third-party services it integrates with, making it susceptible to external issues.
  • Data Privacy Concerns
    Storing and processing data through third-party services may raise privacy and compliance issues for businesses dealing with sensitive information.

Actionsflow features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Actionsflow provides a user-friendly interface that simplifies the automation of workflows through GitHub Actions, making it accessible for users with varying levels of technical expertise.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Allows seamless integration with various services and APIs, enabling users to automate tasks across multiple platforms efficiently.
  • Cost-effective
    As it utilizes GitHub Actions, users can leverage the free tier of GitHub services, making it a cost-effective solution for automating workflows.
  • Flexibility
    Provides flexibility in defining workflows, accommodating custom scripts and logic to suit specific needs and scenarios.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, users can contribute to and modify the codebase, fostering a collaborative community and allowing customization to fit their needs.

Possible disadvantages of Actionsflow

  • Complexity in Advanced Use
    While it's user-friendly for basic tasks, configuring more complex workflows might require a deeper understanding of GitHub Actions syntax and YAML.
  • Limited Offline Support
    As a web-based tool, it requires an internet connection to access GitHub, which might be a limitation for users needing offline capabilities.
  • Dependency on GitHub
    Users are dependent on GitHub's reliability and any limitations of its Actions service, which could affect workflow execution during an outage.
  • Steeper Learning Curve for Non-Developers
    Despite its ease of use, non-developers might face a learning curve initially, especially when dealing with YAML and version control through GitHub.

Make.com videos

Zapier vs Integromat - Quick Comparison Review

More videos:

  • Review - Integromat feature tour
  • Review - Introduction to Integromat

Actionsflow videos

No Actionsflow videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Make.com and Actionsflow)
Automation
96 96%
4% 4
Web Service Automation
Workflow Automation
96 96%
4% 4
Productivity
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Make.com and Actionsflow. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Make.com and Actionsflow

Make.com Reviews

The Best n8n.io Alternatives for Workflow Automation in 2025
Make, formerly known as Integromat, is a versatile no-code platform that enables users to create sophisticated workflows with ease. It offers a visual workflow builder that allows users to connect various applications and services, define conditional logic, and manipulate data without writing any code. Make's strengths lie in its ability to handle complex workflows and its...
Source: latenode.com
N8n.io Alternatives
One of the standout features of Integromat is its flexibility and customization options. Users can set up multi-step workflows with conditional logic, ensuring that each automation is tailored to their specific needs. Additionally, Integromat offers advanced error handling and data manipulation capabilities, providing robust solutions for complex automation requirements. For...
Source: apix-drive.com
The Best MuleSoft Alternatives [2024]
Make (formerly Integromat) is an integration solution that allows you to automate and connect applications, databases, web services, chatbots, and other systems.
Source: exalate.com
Top 9 MuleSoft Alternatives & Competitors in 2024
Make, one of the best Mulesoft alternatives, the ultimate IT process automation tool for enhancing efficiency, productivity, and collaboration. By automating routine tasks, integrating with existing infrastructure, and offering powerful workflow automation, Make empowers your team to streamline processes and achieve remarkable results.
Source: www.zluri.com
Zapier vs. Make.com: Which Automation Tool Will Take the Business Lead?
Make.com offers a cost-effective option for those looking for a business process automation solution, even if it may compromise usability and integration. From your scenario, Make.com seems like a realistic alternative for those with a more limited budget or those willing to work with additional API documentation and webhooks instead of the broader integration that Zapier...

Actionsflow Reviews

We have no reviews of Actionsflow yet.
Be the first one to post

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Make.com and Actionsflow, you can also consider the following products

Zapier - Connect the apps you use everyday to automate your work and be more productive. 1000+ apps and easy integrations - get started in minutes.

ifttt - IFTTT puts the internet to work for you. Create simple connections between the products you use every day.

n8n.io - Free and open fair-code licensed node based Workflow Automation Tool. Easily automate tasks across different services.

Microsoft Power Automate - Microsoft Power Automate is an automation platform that integrates DPA, RPA, and process mining. It lets you automate your organization at scale using low-code and AI.

Autocode - Build app-to-app API workflows with automatic codegen

Apache Airflow - Airflow is a platform to programmaticaly author, schedule and monitor data pipelines.