Instantly Reviews

Molly (Signal fork) Reviews

Instantly mentions (19)

• Massive drop in sales, need advice

  Anywho, the old mailgun system was able to send emails immediately + had images in them. The recommendations we got were to remove ALL images, and instantly.ai has to delay a few minutes between email. So the emails get out slower and no images, plain text looks a lot more scammy to me and I assume also hurts conversions? Source: 9 months ago

• Snov or Lemlist

  What about instantly.ai? Any experience around that? Source: 12 months ago

• Our first email ended up in the user's spam folder

  Yeah, well that's just how it works. You'll need to warm up your domain, there's a lot of ways to do it I would suggest something on the lines of https://instantly.ai/. Source: 12 months ago

• How I've gotten thousands of customers (over 10 years) through cold outreach while only spending ~$50/month

  There are other tools for this also, like Hunter.io for prospecting and Lemlist or Instantly for sending. Source: about 1 year ago

• How to start email marketing alone? (beginner wanting to learn)

  Once the leads list is ready then setup email campaigns using hubspot.com , instantly.ai or snov.io (if you're just starting with low budget). Source: about 1 year ago

Molly (Signal fork) mentions (30)

• What were your less than ideal experiences with GrapheneOS?

  Check out https://molly.im/. It's a hardened Signal fork with one version stripping the google dependencies out of it. Push notifications work flawlessly even with battery optimization enabled. Source: about 1 year ago

• Signal Removes SMS - Any Recommendations?

  The one benefit is that we now have no reason NOT to use Molly (the hardened version of Signal). Previously I didn't just because of sms. https://molly.im/. Source: over 1 year ago

• Why does Signal discourage downloading the apk directly?

  Hi, you can add the repository in fdroid of a fork of signal, Molly Molly , you have a FOSS version. Source: over 1 year ago

• ‘I will show you how safe Telegram is’

  Signal uses Curve25519, AES-256, and HMAC-SHA256 for its e2e encryption. So unless you believe those algorithms are insecure, there's no reason to think that their server setup is a compromise on your messages' security. Fear of "future decryption" applies equally to all forms of encrypted communication, regardless of which servers the messages go through. And since AES-256 is known to resist quantum computing... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

• Re-Adding SMS Support to Signal

  I don't know if they are technically allowed but https://molly.im exists. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago