Instant Page VS ImageKit.io

As for the prefetching I know what it is and even use https://instant.page/ on our site for it, I'm talking about the asynchronous loading that happens on the site. It could be that both things are happening. But it's the asynchronous part I don't get. Source: over 1 year ago

Here's how to make a SPA that isn't shit. https://instant.page/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

I'm not sure its FUD, your main page takes 63.5KB + 38.7KB for the gatsby reactified framework? + an extra 39.8KB in some js bundle and another 51.7KB in some other js bundle. Also you end up thrashing 5MB of browser storage when I hovered a link check out Application -> Storage in Chrome. Maybe I'm crazy but your page should not need that much, your site is making 20 requests to resources (thankfully you have... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

Having the server decide the image format based on the accept header is simpler. Services like https://imagekit.io/ (no affiliation) can do that for you. - Source: Hacker News / 28 days ago

Hosting wise, I would reccomend pythonanywhere.com, combined with either https://imagekit.io or https://cloudinary.com. Source: 12 months ago

Use any third-party service to store images like Cloudinary , imagekit etc... And store image URLs in your database. If you have fewer images you keep image URLs directly in your APIs. Source: over 1 year ago

Imagekit.io – Image CDN with automatic optimization, real-time transformation, and storage that you can integrate with existing setup in minutes. Free plan includes up to 20GB bandwidth per month. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

We'll be using Multer to handle file uploads on our server and imagekit will do all our media heavy lifting. I chose these tools because I just found them easier to use and the latter has a very elaborate documentation (and a free tier too 😋). - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago