Installatron VS ObjectiveFS

Installatron for user application installations and backups. Cpanel native backup for local archives. Custom written script for per-account backups to a remote ssh server for disaster recovery. Source: almost 2 years ago

For workloads with many small files, it usually is better to store many files in a single object. Filesystems with regular POSIX semantics, such as atomic directory renames etc, also makes it easier to integrate with existing software. We have seen a lot of scientific computing usage of our filesystem (https://objectivefs.com) and as you mentioned localized caching of the working set is key to great performance. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

Since this seems to be the crowd that would appreciate it - https://objectivefs.com/ is another good "shared files" option, it uses s3 in the background but has a client in the foreground that caches and checks for when/how to update s3 to minimize transfers and boost performance. Source: 10 months ago

Object storage is a higher-level abstraction than block-storage. FUSE and similar tech can do the job for basic requirements like read-only access by legacy applications but rarely works well for other scenarios. Object storage can be used decently well if there's more complex layer in between like https://objectivefs.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago