Inferno VS DHTMLX

Compare Inferno VS DHTMLX and see what are their differences

LibHunt

LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

Inferno

An extremely fast React-like javascript library for building modern user interfaces.

DHTMLX

JavaScript Library for cross-platform web and mobile app development with HTML5 JavaScript widgets. Easy integration with popular JavaScript Frameworks.

Landing page //
2023-05-11

Landing page //
2023-07-27

Inferno

Website: infernojs.org
$ Details

Edit details

DHTMLX

Website: dhtmlx.com
$ Details

Edit details

Inferno features and specs

High Performance
Inferno is known for its impressive speed and performance, often comparable to or surpassing many other front-end frameworks and libraries, making it suitable for high-performance applications.
React-Like API
Inferno uses a similar API to React, which makes it easier for developers who are already familiar with React to transition to or integrate Inferno.
Compatibility
Due to its React-like API, Inferno can work with many existing React components and libraries, enhancing its versatility and integration capabilities.
Small Size
Inferno has a small footprint, reducing load times and improving overall application performance, especially on mobile devices and slower networks.
Server-Side Rendering
Inferno supports server-side rendering out of the box, allowing for faster initial page loads and better SEO.

Possible disadvantages of Inferno

Smaller Community
Inferno has a smaller community and ecosystem compared to more widely used libraries and frameworks like React, potentially leading to fewer resources, plugins, and support.
Limited Third-Party Libraries
While compatibility with React libraries is a strength, there are still fewer third-party libraries specifically designed for Inferno, which can limit development options in some scenarios.
Learning Curve
For developers who are not familiar with React, there can be a learning curve associated with understanding the Inferno API and concepts.
Infrequent Updates
Compared to larger projects like React, Inferno may have less frequent updates and new feature releases, which can impact the adoption of the latest web development trends.
Less Market Demand
There is currently less market demand for developers proficient in Inferno compared to those skilled in more popular frameworks and libraries, potentially affecting job prospects and opportunities.

DHTMLX features and specs

Comprehensive Suite
DHTMLX offers a wide range of UI components, from grids and charts to complex Gantt and scheduler components, providing a comprehensive toolkit for web application development.
Rich Documentation
The platform provides extensive documentation, demos, and examples, which are invaluable for developers in understanding and implementing various components efficiently.
Cross-Browser Compatibility
DHTMLX components are designed to be fully compatible across major browsers, ensuring a consistent user experience regardless of the user's environment.
Support and Community
DHTMLX offers various support options including forums and ticket-based support, alongside a strong user community that can provide insights and assistance.
Customizability
The components are highly customizable, allowing developers to tailor them to fit the specific aesthetics and functionality requirements of their projects.

Possible disadvantages of DHTMLX

Cost
While DHTMLX provides a free version, the full suite with advanced features requires a paid license, which can be a drawback for startups or individual developers with limited budgets.
Complexity
With its comprehensive set of features, DHTMLX can have a steep learning curve for newcomers who are unfamiliar with its architecture and functionalities.
Dependency on Proprietary Framework
Using DHTMLX can lead to a dependency on its particular frameworks and methodologies, which might be a concern for projects that prioritize open-source solutions.
Performance Overhead
Implementing multiple DHTMLX components in a single application might introduce performance overhead, which requires optimization to maintain responsiveness.
Limited Open Source Contributions
As a commercial library, DHTMLX might not benefit from as many open source contributions and innovations as purely open-source alternatives.

Inferno videos

+ Add

Inferno - Movie Review

DHTMLX videos

+ Add

Dhtmlx Scheduler

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Inferno and DHTMLX)

DHTMLX

Javascript UI Libraries

60 60%

Javascript UI Libraries

40% 40

JavaScript Framework

77 77%

JavaScript Framework

23% 23

JS Library

46 46%

JS Library

54% 54

Development

100 100%

Development

0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Inferno and DHTMLX. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Inferno and DHTMLX

Inferno Reviews

The Best JavaScript Frameworks You’re Not Using

There isn’t an overall number we can use to gauge performance on the chart above, but smaller numbers are better. Obviously, Inferno performs very well again. If you’re a React developer and have a project that requires excellent performance, Inferno is definitely something you should consider. We’ll finish with this from the Inferno “About” page:

Source: jsreport.io

DHTMLX Reviews

We have no reviews of DHTMLX yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Inferno should be more popular than DHTMLX. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Inferno mentions (2)

Solid vs React - the Fastest VS the Most Popular UI Library
Some might argue that React’s relatively poor performance (it’s still plenty-fast for many apps) is due to Virtual DOM and prioritization of development experience, i.e., clarity over complexity. To counter the first argument - there’s React-like Inferno. For the second one - there’s Solid. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
A Look at Compilation in JavaScript Frameworks
A VDOM library like Inferno uses this information to compile its JSX directly into pre-optimized node structures. Marko, and Vue hoist their static VDOM nodes outside of their components so that they don't incur the overhead of recreating them on every render. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago

DHTMLX mentions (1)

How Much Does It Cost To a Project Management App
To finish projects on time, efficient time management is a must. To help managers deal with deadlines, we usually implement a fully functional Gantt chart. To create a reliable and user-friendly UI, choosing the right set of tools is essential. In our work, we usually rely on Webix, a JavaScript UI library developed by the brightest minds of XB Software. Another ace up our sleeve is JavaScript UI libraries by... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Inferno and DHTMLX, you can also consider the following products

Preact.js - Preact is a fast 3kB alternative to React with the same modern API. Components & Virtual DOM.

Bryntum - High performance web components for SaaS apps - including Gantt, Scheduler, Grid, Calendar and Kanban widgets. Seamless integration with React, Vue, Angular or plain JS apps.

Svelte - Cybernetically enhanced web apps

jQuery - The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.

Vue.js - Reactive Components for Modern Web Interfaces

Webix UI - An enterprise JavaScript Library for cross-platform app development with HTML5 JavaScript widgets and easy integration with most popular JavaScript Frameworks.