Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Imixs-Workflow VS Codeship

Compare Imixs-Workflow VS Codeship and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Imixs-Workflow logo Imixs-Workflow

Imixs Workflow is a BPM Framework with the goal to reduce the complexity of business applications.

Codeship logo Codeship

Codeship is a fast and secure hosted Continuous Delivery platform that scales with your needs.
  • Imixs-Workflow Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24
  • Codeship Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-19

Imixs-Workflow features and specs

  • Open Source
    Imixs-Workflow is open-source software, which means it can be freely used, modified, and distributed. This allows for customizability to suit specific business needs and encourages contributions from a community of developers.
  • BPMN 2.0 Support
    The platform supports BPMN 2.0 standards, providing users with a well-established framework for modeling business processes and ensuring compatibility with other BPMN-compliant tools.
  • Flexibility
    Imixs-Workflow is designed to be highly flexible, meaning it can adapt to a wide range of business processes across different industries without significant alteration to the core software.
  • Java EE Integration
    The software integrates seamlessly with Java EE application servers, making it suitable for enterprises already utilizing Java EE technologies for their IT infrastructure.
  • Community Support
    Being open-source, Imixs-Workflow benefits from a supportive community that can assist with troubleshooting, sharing advice, and providing enhancements.

Possible disadvantages of Imixs-Workflow

  • Limited Documentation
    Some users may find the available documentation insufficient for more advanced features, potentially increasing the learning curve and setup time.
  • Open Source Dependency
    As with many open-source solutions, there's a dependency on the community for updates and support, which can sometimes lead to slower release cycles compared to commercial software.
  • Complexity for Beginners
    New users or small businesses with limited technical expertise might find it challenging to implement and customize Imixs-Workflow without professional help.
  • Java Requirement
    Imixs-Workflow's reliance on Java EE might be a barrier for organizations that use different technology stacks, necessitating additional infrastructure or expertise.

Codeship features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Codeship offers an intuitive interface that simplifies the setup process, making it accessible for developers who may not be experienced with continuous integration (CI) and continuous deployment (CD) tools.
  • Integration with Cloud Services
    Codeship integrates seamlessly with cloud services such as AWS, Google Cloud, and Heroku, facilitating easy deployment of applications.
  • Flexible Workflows
    The tool provides support for both Codeship Basic and Codeship Pro, allowing for flexibility in choosing between a more straightforward or a more customizable CI/CD workflow.
  • Docker Support
    Codeship Pro offers extensive support for Docker, allowing developers to use containerization strategies for their build and deployment processes.
  • Parallel Test Pipelines
    It supports parallel test pipelines, which can significantly speed up the testing process and reduce build times.
  • Slack Integration
    Codeship integrates with communication tools like Slack, enabling notifications and updates directly within team communication channels.

Possible disadvantages of Codeship

  • Cost
    Codeship can be more expensive compared to other CI/CD tools, particularly for larger teams or more complex projects that require more build resources.
  • Limited Customization
    For highly customized CI/CD processes, Codeship Basic might be limiting. Users may need to switch to Codeship Pro, which requires more configuration and a steeper learning curve.
  • Performance Bottlenecks
    Users have reported occasional performance bottlenecks, particularly under heavy workloads, which can slow down the CI/CD pipeline.
  • Plugin Ecosystem
    The plugin ecosystem for Codeship is not as extensive as some other CI/CD tools like Jenkins, potentially limiting its integration capabilities.
  • Learning Curve
    While Codeship Basic is relatively easy to use, Codeship Pro has a steeper learning curve, particularly for users who are new to Docker and advanced CI/CD practices.
  • Support
    Although support is available, some users have reported slower response times and less comprehensive support compared to other CI/CD platforms.

Imixs-Workflow videos

No Imixs-Workflow videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Codeship videos

LinuxFest Northwest 2017: Continuous Delivery to Microsoft Azure with Docker through Codeship

More videos:

  • Review - The Codeship -- Continuous Deployment made simple

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Imixs-Workflow and Codeship)
BPM
100 100%
0% 0
DevOps Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Project Management
100 100%
0% 0
Continuous Integration
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Imixs-Workflow and Codeship. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Imixs-Workflow and Codeship

Imixs-Workflow Reviews

  1. An open source human centric workflow eingine

    use imixs-workflow for my own projects

    🏁 Competitors: Camunda, Activiti, BonitaSoft
    👍 Pros:    Bpmn|Open-source|Data protection and security

Codeship Reviews

The Best Alternatives to Jenkins for Developers
Codeship, a CI/CD platform based in the cloud, has an interface that is easy for users and it can integrate with numerous tools and services people are familiar with. It works well for different programming languages and platforms, which makes it suitable for many teams involved in development work.
Source: morninglif.com
Top 10 Most Popular Jenkins Alternatives for DevOps in 2024
CodeShip is a CloudBees SaaS platform that provides a managed CI/CD experience in the cloud. It’s designed to give control back to developers by providing a guided workflow for creating and maintaining CI/CD pipelines. This avoids much of the complexity that’s associated with Jenkins.
Source: spacelift.io
10 Jenkins Alternatives in 2021 for Developers
You could consider using CodeShip to help you to optimize CI/CD cloud deployment. CodeShip can be used by just about any type of development team that looks to increase the efficiency and automation of their code delivery. You can get started within minutes and gain access to an incredible amount of control when setting everything up. The customization options will seem...
The Best Alternatives to Jenkins for Developers
CodeShip is a hosted continuous integration and continuous delivery platform found by CloudBees. It provides fast feedback and customized environments to build applications. It provides integration with almost anything and is good at helping you scale as per your needs. It comes free for up to 100 monthly builds.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Imixs-Workflow and Codeship, you can also consider the following products

BonitaSoft - Bonita BPM is a BPM-based application platform that is designed to help users build highly...

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

Activiti - Activiti is a light-weight workflow and Business Process Management (BPM) Platform targeted at...

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

Camunda - The Universal Process Orchestrator

Travis CI - Simple, flexible, trustworthy CI/CD tools. Join hundreds of thousands who define tests and deployments in minutes, then scale up simply with parallel or multi-environment builds using Travis CI’s precision syntax—all with the developer in mind.