ImageMagick VS OptiPNG

ImageMagick is a pretty standard tool for image manipulation and it's got a pretty powerful command line interface which honestly is often overwhelming but fortunately there are plenty of forums, stack overflow, etc to get good examples. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago

The graphics then turned to the 9-bit palette and 15 or 16 colours with the ImageMagick. Source: 8 months ago

But it can be quite large. You can also use the appropriate "start" and "duration" options to selectively get a portion out. Animated gifs are pretty inefficient as it is so I'm usually happy with the above, and make sure to only restrict to 5-10s max, but there are other programs to try and help reduce the size, like gifsicle [1] and imagemagick [2]. [0]... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

I used to do stuff like this programmatically with ImageMagick. https://imagemagick.org/index.php. Source: 10 months ago

Yup don't worry. ImageMagick is a command line image processing tool. Byobu is a terminal manager that lets you run multiple virtual terminals inside it. Super useful if you're SSHing to a remote machine and need to run multiple terminals. Source: 10 months ago

This project uses HTMLMinifier, optipng, and zopfli to create a custom production Elm build pipeline. You can see how I make use of these tools in this build script. Here are the results in case you're interested. I used the same ideas from this project to build and deploy dwayne/elm-conduit, which you can learn more about in my article Yet Another Tour of an Open-Source Elm SPA. - Source: dev.to / about 21 hours ago

Did you compare to PNG crush and optipng? Those are what I used to use because they're easily installable Linux/brew packages. Source: about 1 year ago

Assuming your frames are PNG files, you could use a lossless optimizer like optipng to try if their size can be reduced. I prefer oxipng, which is faster and multithreaded, and seems to have more active development. Source: over 2 years ago