Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

IBM MQ VS Apache Cassandra

Compare IBM MQ VS Apache Cassandra and see what are their differences

Cyclr
Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

IBM MQ logo IBM MQ

IBM MQ is messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and data across multiple platforms.

Apache Cassandra logo Apache Cassandra

The Apache Cassandra database is the right choice when you need scalability and high availability without compromising performance.
  • IBM MQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-03
  • Apache Cassandra Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-17

IBM MQ features and specs

  • Reliability
    IBM MQ is renowned for its high reliability, ensuring that your messages are delivered once and only once. This is critical for applications where message loss can result in significant operational issues.
  • Security
    It provides robust security features, including authentication, encryption, and authorization, which are essential for protecting sensitive data in transit.
  • Scalability
    IBM MQ can scale horizontally and vertically to meet the demands of growing applications and varying workloads, making it suitable for both small-scale and enterprise-level deployments.
  • Integrations
    It supports a wide range of platforms and programming languages, which makes it easier to integrate with existing systems and applications.
  • Transaction Support
    It offers comprehensive support for transactions, ensuring that multiple related messages are processed in a single unit of work, which can be rolled back if needed.
  • High Availability
    Features like queue manager clustering and multi-instance queue managers provide high availability and disaster recovery capabilities.

Possible disadvantages of IBM MQ

  • Cost
    IBM MQ is a premium product, which means it comes with a significant cost, especially for large-scale enterprise deployments.
  • Complexity
    Setting up and maintaining IBM MQ can be complex, requiring specialized knowledge and skills, which can be a barrier for smaller teams or organizations.
  • Resource Intensive
    It can be resource-intensive, requiring substantial computational resources for its full operation, which may not be ideal for lightweight or resource-constrained environments.
  • Dependency
    Using IBM MQ can create a dependency on IBM’s ecosystem, which might limit flexibility and increase the cost and complexity of switching to a different messaging solution in the future.
  • Learning Curve
    There is a steep learning curve associated with IBM MQ, particularly for new users who are not familiar with message queuing or IBM's specific implementation.
  • Licensing
    The licensing model can be complex and sometimes difficult to navigate, potentially leading to unexpected costs if not carefully managed.

Apache Cassandra features and specs

  • Scalability
    Apache Cassandra is designed for linear scalability and can handle large volumes of data across many commodity servers without a single point of failure.
  • High Availability
    Cassandra ensures high availability by replicating data across multiple nodes. Even if some nodes fail, the system remains operational.
  • Performance
    It provides fast writes and reads by using a peer-to-peer architecture, making it highly suitable for applications requiring quick data access.
  • Flexible Data Model
    Cassandra supports a flexible schema, allowing users to add new columns to a table at any time, making it adaptable for various use cases.
  • Geographical Distribution
    Data can be distributed across multiple data centers, ensuring low-latency access for geographically distributed users.
  • No Single Point of Failure
    Its decentralized nature ensures there is no single point of failure, which enhances resilience and fault-tolerance.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Cassandra

  • Complexity
    Managing and configuring Cassandra can be complex, requiring specialized knowledge and skills for optimal performance.
  • Eventual Consistency
    Cassandra follows an eventual consistency model, meaning that there might be a delay before all nodes have the latest data, which may not be suitable for all use cases.
  • Write-heavy Operations
    Although Cassandra handles writes efficiently, write-heavy workloads can lead to compaction issues and increased read latency.
  • Limited Query Capabilities
    Cassandra's query capabilities are relatively limited compared to traditional RDBMS, lacking support for complex joins and aggregations.
  • Maintenance Overhead
    Regular maintenance tasks such as node repair and compaction are necessary to ensure optimal performance, adding to the administrative overhead.
  • Tooling and Ecosystem
    While the ecosystem for Cassandra is growing, it is still not as extensive or mature as those for some other database technologies.

IBM MQ videos

+ Add

IBM Watson Virtual Agent _ (Part 01)

More videos:

  • Review - IBM MQ Clustering - Tom Dunlap
  • Review - IBM Db2 Analytics Accelerator for z/OS
  • Review - IBM Blockchain Platform - 2019 Review - All You Need to Know
  • Review - IBM Db2 Analytics Accelerator – IDAA Afternoon Show 2019 08 28
  • Review - IBM Blockchain Platform Community Call – Next Generation Platform Tour + Q&A
  • Review - IBM MQ V9 Open Source Monitoring
  • Review - The next generation of the IBM Blockchain Platform

Apache Cassandra videos

+ Add

Course Intro | DS101: Introduction to Apache Cassandra™

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to Apache Cassandra™

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to IBM MQ and Apache Cassandra)

IBM MQ

Apache Cassandra

Data Integration
100 100%
Data Integration
0% 0
Databases
0 0%
Databases
100% 100
Cloud Computing
100 100%
Cloud Computing
0% 0
NoSQL Databases
0 0%
NoSQL Databases
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using IBM MQ and Apache Cassandra. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare IBM MQ and Apache Cassandra

IBM MQ Reviews

6 Best Kafka Alternatives: 2022’s Must-know List
IBM MQ is one of the best Kafka Alternatives which has an easy-to-use Interface and High Reliability and Data Security. It also facilitates the interoperability between various applications, either within or outside the organization. IBM MQ allows developers to focus on critical issues and manage any changes to transaction volumes asynchronously due to its simple structure.
Source: hevodata.com
Top 15 Alternatives to RabbitMQ In 2021
IBM MQ is an official message middleware which shortens the integration of varied applications and data spread throughout numerous platforms. It employs a message queue to share the info and offers a distinct messaging service for cloud systems, IoT gadgets, and mobile environments. By linking every element virtually from modest device to most complicated industrial...
Source: gokicker.com
Top 15 Kafka Alternatives Popular In 2021
IBM MQ is an easily usable interface with a great deal of reliability and security. Support is readily available in case needed anytime. It looks at handling the interoperability between various applications, be it within the organization or outside. It has asynchronous competencies and offers message integrity and relentless delivery. Because of its simplistic nature, it...
Source: www.spec-india.com

Apache Cassandra Reviews

16 Top Big Data Analytics Tools You Should Know About
Application Areas: If you want to work with SQL-like data types on a No-SQL database, Cassandra is a good choice. It is a popular pick in the IoT, fraud detection applications, recommendation engines, product catalogs and playlists, and messaging applications, providing fast real-time insights.
Source: www.analytixlabs.co.in
9 Best MongoDB alternatives in 2019
The Apache Cassandra is an ideal choice for you if you want scalability and high availability without affecting its performance. This MongoDB alternative tool offers support for replicating across multiple datacenters.
Source: www.guru99.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Cassandra seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 44 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

IBM MQ mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of IBM MQ yet. Tracking of IBM MQ recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Apache Cassandra mentions (44)

  • Why You Shouldn’t Invest In Vector Databases?
    In fact, even in the absence of these commercial databases, users can effortlessly install PostgreSQL and leverage its built-in pgvector functionality for vector search. PostgreSQL stands as the benchmark in the realm of open-source databases, offering comprehensive support across various domains of database management. It excels in transaction processing (e.g., CockroachDB), online analytics (e.g., DuckDB),... - Source: dev.to / 17 days ago
  • Data integrity in Ably Pub/Sub
    All messages are persisted durably for two minutes, but Pub/Sub channels can be configured to persist messages for longer periods of time using the persisted messages feature. Persisted messages are additionally written to Cassandra. Multiple copies of the message are stored in a quorum of globally-distributed Cassandra nodes. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Which Database is Perfect for You? A Comprehensive Guide to MySQL, PostgreSQL, NoSQL, and More
    Cassandra is a highly scalable, distributed NoSQL database designed to handle large amounts of data across many commodity servers without a single point of failure. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Consistent Hashing: An Overview and Implementation in Golang
    Distributed storage Distributed storage systems like Cassandra, DynamoDB, and Voldemort also use consistent hashing. In these systems, data is partitioned across many servers. Consistent hashing is used to map data to the servers that store the data. When new servers are added or removed, consistent hashing minimizes the amount of data that needs to be remapped to different servers. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Understanding SQL vs. NoSQL Databases: A Beginner's Guide
    On the other hand, NoSQL databases are non-relational databases. They store data in flexible, JSON-like documents, key-value pairs, or wide-column stores. Examples include MongoDB, Couchbase, and Cassandra. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing IBM MQ and Apache Cassandra, you can also consider the following products

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.

Ethereum - Ethereum is a decentralized platform for applications that run exactly as programmed without any chance of fraud, censorship or third-party interference.

MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.

Hyperledger - Hyperledger is a multi-project open source collaborative effort hosted by The Linux Foundation, created to advance cross-industry blockchain technologies.

ArangoDB - A distributed open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values.

Loading...