Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Hyperledger VS Confluent

Compare Hyperledger VS Confluent and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Hyperledger logo Hyperledger

Hyperledger is a multi-project open source collaborative effort hosted by The Linux Foundation, created to advance cross-industry blockchain technologies.

Confluent logo Confluent

Confluent offers a real-time data platform built around Apache Kafka.
  • Hyperledger Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-26
  • Confluent Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-22

Hyperledger features and specs

  • Permissioned Network
    Hyperledger operates on a permissioned blockchain, meaning that participants must be known and authorized. This enhances security and trust among members of the network.
  • Modular Architecture
    Its modular architecture allows users to plug and play different components like consensus algorithms, membership services, and data storage options, offering great flexibility and customization.
  • High Scalability
    Hyperledger is designed to scale with the needs of different businesses, making it suitable for large enterprise-level applications.
  • Strong Governance
    Backed by the Linux Foundation, Hyperledger benefits from strong governance and contributions from industry leaders, ensuring better code quality and ongoing development.
  • Interoperability
    Hyperledger prioritizes interoperability between different blockchain networks, allowing for seamless integration and communication across different platforms.

Possible disadvantages of Hyperledger

  • Complex Setup
    Setting up and managing a Hyperledger network can be complex and may require significant expertise, making it less accessible for small businesses or individual developers.
  • Limited Adoption
    Compared to public blockchains like Ethereum and Bitcoin, Hyperledger has less widespread adoption, which could limit its network effects and community support.
  • Performance Overhead
    The additional layers of security and permissioned access can introduce performance overhead, potentially affecting transaction speeds and overall system performance.
  • Cost
    The need for specialized knowledge and potentially complex hardware setups can translate to higher costs, which may not be feasible for all organizations.
  • Less Decentralization
    Because Hyperledger is permissioned, it offers less decentralization compared to public blockchains. This could be a drawback for users who prioritize a decentralized network.

Confluent features and specs

  • Scalability
    Confluent is built on Apache Kafka, which allows for smooth scalability to handle growing data needs without significant performance degradation.
  • Real-Time Data Processing
    Confluent enables real-time streaming data processing, which is beneficial for applications requiring immediate data insights and actions.
  • Comprehensive Ecosystem
    Confluent provides a rich set of tools and connectors that integrate seamlessly with various data sources and sinks, making it easier to build and manage data pipelines.
  • Ease of Use
    Confluent offers an intuitive user interface and comprehensive documentation, which simplifies the setup and management of Kafka clusters.
  • Managed Service Option
    Confluent Cloud provides a fully managed Kafka service, reducing the operational burden on the engineering team and allowing businesses to focus on developing applications.
  • Advanced Security Features
    Confluent offers robust security features including encryption, SSL, ACLs, and more, ensuring that data streams are protected.
  • Strong Customer Support
    Confluent offers professional support and consultancy services which can be very helpful for enterprises requiring 24/7 support and expertise.

Possible disadvantages of Confluent

  • Cost
    Confluent can be expensive, especially for small to medium-sized businesses. The costs can grow significantly with scale and additional enterprise features.
  • Complexity
    Despite its ease of use, the underlying system’s complexity can pose a challenge, particularly for teams who are new to Kafka or streaming data technologies.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running Confluent on-premises can be resource-intensive, requiring significant computational and storage resources to maintain optimal performance.
  • Learning Curve
    For those unfamiliar with Kafka and streaming technologies, there is a steep learning curve which can lead to longer implementation times.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    Utilizing Confluent’s proprietary tools and connectors can result in vendor lock-in, making it difficult to switch to alternative solutions without considerable effort and reconfiguration.
  • Dependency on Cloud Provider
    If using Confluent Cloud, dependency on the cloud provider’s infrastructure may introduce compliance and control limitations, particularly for businesses with strict data sovereignty requirements.

Analysis of Hyperledger

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Hyperledger is considered a reliable and versatile option for organizations looking to implement blockchain technology, especially in enterprise settings where security and scalability are critical.

Why this product is good

  • Hyperledger is a collaborative open-source project hosted by the Linux Foundation, aimed at advancing cross-industry blockchain technologies. It is highly regarded for its modular architecture, which allows for flexibility in using various blockchain components, and its emphasis on permissioned blockchains, ensuring privacy and security. Hyperledger boasts a robust ecosystem of frameworks and tools like Hyperledger Fabric and Hyperledger Sawtooth, backed by a strong community and support from major industry players.

Recommended for

  • Enterprises seeking to build or deploy secure, scalable distributed ledger applications.
  • Developers looking for open-source blockchain frameworks with modular architectures.
  • Organizations needing permissioned blockchain solutions for privacy and compliance requirements.
  • Industries such as finance, supply chain, healthcare, and government institutions that require customizable and private blockchain platforms.

Hyperledger videos

Traxion ICO review - Hyperledger fabric technology

More videos:

  • Review - Matrix AI Review - $MAN - Intelligent Blockchain - Easier | Safer | Faster | Flexible + Hyperledger
  • Review - Overview: Agents and Hyperledger Indy - Kyle Den Hartog, Evernym - Part 1

Confluent videos

1. Intro | Monitoring Kafka in Confluent Control Center

More videos:

  • Review - Jason Gustafson, Confluent: Revisiting Exactly One Semantics (EOS) | Bay Area Apache Kafka® Meetup
  • Review - CLEARER SKIN AFTER 1 USE‼️| Ancient Cosmetics Update✨| CONFLUENT & RETICULATED PAPILLOMATOSIS CURE?😩

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Hyperledger and Confluent)
Cloud Infrastructure
100 100%
0% 0
Stream Processing
0 0%
100% 100
Cloud Computing
100 100%
0% 0
Big Data
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Hyperledger and Confluent. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Hyperledger should be more popular than Confluent. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Hyperledger mentions (2)

  • Do You Need a Blockchain?
    In my day job[0], I talk to a lot of start-up ventures about blockchain. Only one was honest enough to say they were only using it because, at the time, it was easier to get funding. [0]: https://hyperledger.org/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
  • Ethereum Tech Used to Build a Smart Contract Platform for 5G Mobile Networks
    Ethereum is not just currency at its core, its a smart contract platform which is used to implement distributed consensus, where each participating party sign the result, with their consensus algorithm. Currency is a side effect. You can just remove the entire ETH/gas dependency on the base, to use the platform as a distributed ledger between all the participants. And use another kind of consensus algo(proof of... Source: almost 4 years ago

Confluent mentions (1)

  • Spring Boot Event Streaming with Kafka
    We’re going to setup a Kafka cluster using confluent.io, create a producer and consumer as well as enhance our behavior driven tests to include the new interface. We’re going to update our helm chart so that the updates are seamless to Kubernetes and we’re going to leverage our observability stack to propagate the traces in the published messages. Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Hyperledger and Confluent, you can also consider the following products

Ethereum - Ethereum is a decentralized platform for applications that run exactly as programmed without any chance of fraud, censorship or third-party interference.

Amazon Kinesis - Amazon Kinesis services make it easy to work with real-time streaming data in the AWS cloud.

IBM MQ - IBM MQ is messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and data across multiple platforms.

Apache Flink - Flink is a streaming dataflow engine that provides data distribution, communication, and fault tolerance for distributed computations.

BlockCypher - AWS for Block Chains

PieSync - Seamless two-way sync between your CRM, marketing apps and Google in no time