Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Hydra Postgres Analytics VS TimescaleDB

Compare Hydra Postgres Analytics VS TimescaleDB and see what are their differences

Hydra Postgres Analytics logo Hydra Postgres Analytics

Hydra is an open source, column-oriented Postgres. Query billions of rows instantly, no code changes.

TimescaleDB logo TimescaleDB

TimescaleDB is a time-series SQL database providing fast analytics, scalability, with automated data management on a proven storage engine.
Not present
  • TimescaleDB Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-23

Hydra Postgres Analytics features and specs

  • Scalability
    Hydra Postgres Analytics is designed to handle large volumes of data efficiently, making it suitable for organizations that need to process high data throughput.
  • Real-time Analysis
    The platform supports real-time data analysis, allowing users to gain insights from their data without significant delays, which is crucial for timely decision-making.
  • Postgres Compatibility
    Hydra is compatible with PostgreSQL, which is a widely used and respected database system. This compatibility allows for seamless integration with existing PostgreSQL databases.
  • User-friendly Interface
    It offers an intuitive and user-friendly interface that makes it accessible to both technical and non-technical users, reducing the learning curve.
  • Advanced Querying
    Hydra provides powerful querying capabilities, enabling complex data retrieval and manipulation without compromising on performance.

Possible disadvantages of Hydra Postgres Analytics

  • Cost
    Depending on the size and needs of the organization, the cost of using Hydra can be significant, particularly for smaller businesses with limited budgets.
  • Integration Complexity
    Integrating Hydra with existing systems and workflows might be complex and time-consuming, especially if those systems are not based on PostgreSQL.
  • Learning Curve
    While the interface is user-friendly, more advanced features of Hydra may require a learning curve for those unfamiliar with data analytics or PostgreSQL.
  • Limited Customization
    Some users may find that Hydra's customization options do not fully meet their unique business requirements, limiting its flexibility in certain scenarios.
  • Dependency on PostgreSQL
    Organizations not using PostgreSQL might find it challenging to adopt Hydra without migrating their existing databases, which can be a resource-intensive process.

TimescaleDB features and specs

  • Scalability
    TimescaleDB offers excellent horizontal and vertical scalability, which allows it to handle large volumes of data efficiently. Its architecture is designed to accommodate growth by distributing and efficiently managing data shards.
  • Time-Series Data Optimization
    Specifically optimized for time-series data, TimescaleDB provides features like hypertables and continuous aggregates that speed up queries and optimize storage for time-based data.
  • SQL Compatibility
    As an extension of PostgreSQL, TimescaleDB offers full SQL support, making it familiar to developers and allowing easy integration with existing SQL-based systems and applications.
  • Retention Policies
    TimescaleDB includes built-in data retention policies, enabling automatic management of historical data and freeing up storage by performing automatic data roll-ups or deletes.
  • Integration with the PostgreSQL Ecosystem
    It benefits from PostgreSQL's rich ecosystem of extensions, tools, and optimizations, allowing for versatile use cases beyond just time-series data while maintaining robust reliability and performance.

Possible disadvantages of TimescaleDB

  • Learning Curve
    Although it’s SQL-based, developers might face a learning curve to fully leverage TimescaleDB's time-series specific features such as hypertables and specific optimization techniques.
  • Limited Write Scalability
    While it's scalable, TimescaleDB might face challenges with extremely high-throughput write workloads compared to some NoSQL time-series databases, which are specifically built for such tasks.
  • Dependency on PostgreSQL
    As it operates as a PostgreSQL extension, any limitations and issues in PostgreSQL might directly affect TimescaleDB's performance and capabilities.
  • Complexity in Setup for High Availability
    Setting up TimescaleDB with high availability and distributed systems might introduce complexities, particularly for organizations that are not well-versed in PostgreSQL clustering and replication strategies.
  • Storage Overhead
    The additional storage features add an overhead, which means that while it adds value with its optimizations, users need to manage storage resources effectively, especially in environments with very large datasets.

Hydra Postgres Analytics videos

No Hydra Postgres Analytics videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

TimescaleDB videos

Rearchitecting a SQL Database for Time-Series Data | TimescaleDB

More videos:

  • Review - Visualizing Time-Series Data with TimescaleDB and Grafana

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Hydra Postgres Analytics and TimescaleDB)
Databases
20 20%
80% 80
NoSQL Databases
37 37%
63% 63
Time Series Database
15 15%
85% 85
Relational Databases
32 32%
68% 68

User comments

Share your experience with using Hydra Postgres Analytics and TimescaleDB. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Hydra Postgres Analytics and TimescaleDB

Hydra Postgres Analytics Reviews

We have no reviews of Hydra Postgres Analytics yet.
Be the first one to post

TimescaleDB Reviews

ClickHouse vs TimescaleDB
Recently, TimescaleDB published a blog comparing ClickHouse & TimescaleDB using timescale/tsbs, a timeseries benchmarking framework. I have some experience with PostgreSQL and ClickHouse but never got the chance to play with TimescaleDB. Some of the claims about TimescaleDB made in their post are very bold, that made me even more curious. I thought it’d be a great...
4 Best Time Series Databases To Watch in 2019
The Guardian did a very nice article explaining on they went from MongoDB to PostgresSQL in the favor of scaling their architecture and encrypting their content at REST. As you can tell, big companies are relying on SQL-constraint systems (with a cloud architecture of course) to ensure system reliability and accessibility. I believe that PostgresSQL will continue to grow, so...
Source: medium.com
20+ MongoDB Alternatives You Should Know About
TimescaleDB If on the other hand you are storing time series data in MongoDB, then TimescaleDB might be a good fit.
Source: www.percona.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, TimescaleDB should be more popular than Hydra Postgres Analytics. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Hydra Postgres Analytics mentions (1)

TimescaleDB mentions (5)

  • Ask HN: Does anyone use InfluxDB? Or should we switch?
    (:alert: I work for Timescale :alert:) It's funny, we hear this more and more "we did some research and landed on Influx and ... Help it's confusing". We actually wrote an article about what we think, you can find it here: https://www.timescale.com/blog/what-influxdb-got-wrong/ As the QuestDB folks mentioned if you want a drop in replacement for Influx then they would be an option, it kinda sounds that's not what... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Best small scale dB for time series data?
    If you like PostgreSQL, I'd recommend starting with that. Additionally, you can try TimescaleDB (it's a PostgreSQL extension for time-series data with full SQL support) it has many features that are useful even on a small-scale, things like:. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Quick n Dirty IoT sensor & event storage (Django backend)
    I have built a Django server which serves up the JSON configuration, and I'd also like the server to store and render sensor graphs & event data for my Thing. In future, I'd probably use something like timescale.com as it is a database suited for this application. However right now I only have a handful of devices, and don't want to spend a lot of time configuring my back end when the Thing is my focus. So I'm... Source: over 3 years ago
  • How fast and scalable is TimescaleDB compare to a NoSQL Database?
    I've seen a lot of benchmark results on timescale on the web but they all come from timescale.com so I just want to ask if those are accurate. Source: over 3 years ago
  • The State of PostgreSQL 2021 Survey is now open!
    Ryan from Timescale here. We (TimescaleDB) just launched the second annual State of PostgreSQL survey, which asks developers across the globe about themselves, how they use PostgreSQL, their experiences with the community, and more. Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Hydra Postgres Analytics and TimescaleDB, you can also consider the following products

Citus Data - Worry-free Postgres. Built to scale out, Citus distributes data & queries across nodes so your database can scale and your queries are fast. Available as a database as a service, as enterprise software, & as open source.

InfluxData - Scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics.

Prometheus - An open-source systems monitoring and alerting toolkit.

VictoriaMetrics - Fast, easy-to-use, and cost-effective time series database

Oracle DBaaS - See how Oracle Database 12c enables businesses to plug into the cloud and power the real-time enterprise.

QuestDB - QuestDB is the fastest open source time series database