Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

hub VS Webpacker

Compare hub VS Webpacker and see what are their differences

Setuply
Setuply: Transform Clients into Brand Advocates. An AI-powered, purpose-built platform for client onboarding and lifecycle management, helping B2B teams accelerate revenue recognition, boost retention, and scale operations with confidence. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

hub logo hub

The Hub is a versatile intranet portal and collaboration solution that boosts employee engagement and productivity in a digital workplace.

Webpacker logo Webpacker

Use Webpack to manage app-like JavaScript modules in Rails - rails/webpacker
  • hub Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-14
  • Webpacker Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-27

hub features and specs

  • Enhanced Git Functionality
    hub provides additional commands and functions tailored specifically for GitHub, simplifying workflows related to pull requests, forks, and more.
  • Command-Line Convenience
    It integrates directly with the Git command-line interface, allowing developers to leverage GitHub features without leaving the terminal.
  • Open Source
    hub is open-source software, so it is free to use, and the codebase can be audited and modified by the community.
  • Active Development
    The tool has an active community and frequent updates, which ensures compatibility with new GitHub features and bug fixes.

Possible disadvantages of hub

  • Learning Curve
    For those unfamiliar with command-line tools or GitHub's API, there may be a learning curve to fully utilize hub's capabilities.
  • Platform Dependency
    hub is designed specifically for GitHub. Its features are not compatible with other Git hosting services like GitLab or Bitbucket.
  • Limited Scope
    While hub enhances many aspects of working with GitHub, it doesn't cover all possible use cases or workflows, potentially requiring supplemental tools.
  • Installation and Updates
    As an external tool, hub needs to be installed and maintained separately from Git, which can add overhead in terms of setup and updates.

Webpacker features and specs

  • Modern JavaScript Features
    Webpacker allows Rails applications to utilize modern JavaScript features and tools, such as ES6 syntax, JSX, and TypeScript, thereby enhancing the developer experience and code quality.
  • Asset Bundling
    It efficiently bundles multiple JavaScript files into a single package, reducing load times and improving performance by minimizing the number of HTTP requests.
  • Integration with Rails
    As an official Rails library, Webpacker integrates seamlessly with the Rails framework, ensuring that front-end builds are consistent and easier to manage alongside Ruby on Rails projects.
  • Configurable
    Provides a highly configurable environment, allowing developers to customize their JavaScript and asset builds extensively to meet specific project needs.
  • Community Support
    Being part of the Rails ecosystem, Webpacker benefits from an extensive community support, with a wealth of third-party resources, documentation, and plugins available.

Possible disadvantages of Webpacker

  • Complexity
    Webpacker can introduce additional complexity, especially for developers not familiar with JavaScript tooling or the webpack configuration, which can lead to a steeper learning curve.
  • Performance Overhead
    The abstraction and tooling required by Webpacker can add performance overhead during development with slower compilation and building times compared to simpler asset management solutions.
  • Dependency Management
    Managing dependencies can become burdensome as Webpacker requires handling both the Ruby Gems and the JavaScript packages through yarn or npm, increasing maintenance efforts.
  • Migration Path
    As newer tools and techniques emerge, moving away from Webpacker could require significant refactoring efforts, especially for applications with extensive custom configurations.
  • Deprecated Status
    Webpacker is no longer the recommended default for new Rails applications starting from Rails 7, which now prefers using esbuild or importmaps, potentially affecting its long-term viability.

Analysis of hub

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Hub is a good tool for developers who prefer command-line operations and require seamless GitHub integration in their workflow.

Why this product is good

  • Hub (hub.github.com) enhances the Git command line experience by adding extra features for GitHub integration. It simplifies workflows like creating pull requests, forking repositories, and more directly from the terminal, which can save time and streamline processes for developers who frequently interact with GitHub.

Recommended for

  • Developers who frequently use GitHub and prefer command-line interfaces.
  • Teams looking to streamline their GitHub workflows without switching between terminal and web interface.
  • Open-source contributors who need efficient interactions with multiple repositories.

hub videos

+ Add

Speedone Sniper 150T Rachet | Hub Review & Soundcheck

More videos:

  • Review - Nissan Sunny B211 (B210 Facelift) Review (Sinhala) | Auto Hub
  • Review - Fanatec CSW Universal Hub Review

Webpacker videos

+ Add

RailsConf 2020 CE - Webpacker, It-Just-Works, But How? by Justin Gordon

More videos:

  • Review - Should you use React with Webpacker in your Rails project? Rails MVC vs Single Page App (SPA)!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to hub and Webpacker)

hub

Webpacker

Communication
100 100%
Communication
0% 0
Web Application Bundler
0 0%
Web Application Bundler
100% 100
Project Management
100 100%
Project Management
0% 0
JS Build Tools
0 0%
JS Build Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using hub and Webpacker. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Webpacker should be more popular than hub. It has been mentiond 17 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

hub mentions (4)

  • GitHub Discussion about the recent feed changes becomes 3rd most upvoted ever
    Use hub here via CLI and forget the gui https://hub.github.com/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Pull request Best Practices
    Try automating the PR process as much as possible. Make use of tools like hub CLI for speeding up the pull request process. Code quality tools can help you automate the due diligence for coding standards and conventions, and test automation tools can assist in bug discovery, and identifying security vulnerabilities. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • [Media] I made a Rust CLI game that tests how fast you can guess the language of a code block!
    Parse_git_branch() { # Speed up opening up a new terminal tab by not # checking `$HOME` ...which can't be a repo anyway # # For the heck of it, micro-optimize this too: # time (repeat 1000000 { [ "$PWD" = "$HOME" ] } ) == ~4.2s # time (repeat 1000000 { [[ "$PWD" == "$HOME" ]] } ) == ~1.4s [[ "$PWD" == "$HOME" ]] && return # Fastest known way to check the current branch name ... Source: almost 3 years ago
  • I have 20 repositories, is there any way I can create a report showing how many open issues in each?
    You can always query via github api or use the hub client (from their home page https://hub.github.com/). Source: over 3 years ago

Webpacker mentions (17)

  • React + Ruby on Rails without any gems
    We will use Webpacker or JavaScript compiler and assets management. By following the webpacker installation guide, let’s add Webpacker and React to our application. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • Collecting JavaScript code coverage with Capybara in Ruby on Rails application
    For example, there is a Ruby on Rails application that uses Webpacker and has JavaScript files that are covered by the system tests. Capybara is used as the system testing tool. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Asset Pipeline JS Migration
    Using Webpacker in Rails provides several advantages over the traditional asset pipeline. First, Webpacker uses JavaScript modules, which allows for better code organization and improved code reusability. Second, it offers modern frontend build tools, such as Babel and PostCSS, for transforming and compiling assets. Third, it provides faster build times and faster runtime performance through code splitting and... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Thank you Webpacker, Goodbye Webpacker
    This article is replace Webpacker with Simpacker and webpack. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • How to setup ruby on rails + Angular
    In ruby ​​on rails 7 what is the best way to properly install Angular because I can't find any documentation about it. The only tutorial that exists uses webpacker (https://github.com/rails/webpacker) but unfortunately it is no longer supported and no longer up to date in terms of security. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing hub and Webpacker, you can also consider the following products

LS Intranet - LS Intranet is a corporate intranet that facilitates multiple employees collaborating on projects, and working in synergy.

Webpack - Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.

Communifire - Enterprise Social Collaboration Software

Turbolinks - Turbolinks makes navigating your web application faster

CodeHub - CodeHub is the most complete, unofficial, client for GitHub on the iOS platform.

Yarn - Yarn is a package manager for your code.

Loading...