Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

HTTrack VS Webrecorder

Compare HTTrack VS Webrecorder and see what are their differences

HTTrack logo HTTrack

HTTrack is a free (GPL, libre/free software) and easy-to-use offline browser utility.

Webrecorder logo Webrecorder

Create high-fidelity, interactive web archives of any web site you browse.
  • HTTrack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24
  • Webrecorder Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-13

HTTrack features and specs

  • Free and Open Source
    HTTrack is completely free to use and its source code is available for modification and redistribution, making it an accessible option for a wide range of users.
  • Cross-Platform
    HTTrack is available for Windows, Linux, and macOS, allowing users to utilize the tool regardless of their operating system.
  • Customizable
    The tool provides a variety of options for customizing the download process, such as adjusting the download speed, depth, and filtering certain file types or URLs.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    HTTrack offers a graphical user interface (GUI) that simplifies the web scraping process, even for users with minimal technical expertise.
  • Offline Browsing
    Users can download entire websites for offline browsing, which is particularly useful in low-bandwidth environments or for archival purposes.

Possible disadvantages of HTTrack

  • Legal and Ethical Concerns
    Downloading entire websites can violate terms of service and copyright laws. Users must ensure they have permission to scrape the content.
  • Resource Intensive
    HTTrack can consume significant bandwidth and disk space, affecting both the user's machine and the target website’s server, which can become a burden for sites with heavy traffic.
  • Complexity in Advanced Use
    While the basic functions are user-friendly, advanced customizations and troubleshooting can be complex and may require technical knowledge.
  • Incomplete or Broken Downloads
    Depending on the website's structure, HTTrack can sometimes fail to download all resources correctly, leading to incomplete or broken pages.
  • Security Risks
    Downloading and storing entire websites locally can pose security risks, especially if malicious scripts or malware are inadvertently downloaded.

Webrecorder features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Conifer offers a simple and intuitive interface that makes it easy for users to navigate and capture web content without requiring technical expertise.
  • Accurate Web Capture
    The tool provides high-fidelity web captures, preserving the interactive and dynamic nature of web pages, including JavaScript and multimedia content.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, Conifer allows users to modify and improve its functionalities to better suit their archiving needs.
  • Community Support
    Conifer has a community of users and developers who contribute to its development and offer support, which can be beneficial for troubleshooting and learning.
  • Free to Use
    The platform is available for free, making it accessible for individuals and organizations with limited budgets to capture and preserve web content.

Possible disadvantages of Webrecorder

  • Limited Storage
    Users are provided with limited storage space, which might be a constraint for those needing to archive large volumes of web content.
  • Learning Curve
    While the interface is user-friendly, new users might still face a learning curve in understanding how to effectively capture different types of web content.
  • Performance Issues
    Depending on the complexity of the web content, users may experience slower performance during the capturing process.
  • Dependency on Internet Access
    Conifer requires internet access to capture web pages, which could be a limitation in environments with unreliable or restricted internet connectivity.
  • Browser Compatibility
    The effectiveness of capturing dynamic content may vary based on the browser being used, potentially leading to inconsistent results.

HTTrack videos

LABS 5 Mirroring Website Using HTTrack Web Site Copier REVIEW

More videos:

  • Review - HakTip - Mirror Websites with HTTrack
  • Tutorial - How to clone any website||How to copy all webpage of a website httrack

Webrecorder videos

7. 'Web & Social Media Archiving:' Rhizome’s Webrecorder

More videos:

  • Review - Learn more about Webrecorder.io collections (Pelican Bomb)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to HTTrack and Webrecorder)
Utilities
92 92%
8% 8
Bookmark Manager
0 0%
100% 100
Download Manager
94 94%
6% 6
Web Copier
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using HTTrack and Webrecorder. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare HTTrack and Webrecorder

HTTrack Reviews

15 Best Httrack Alternatives Offline Browser Utility
It offers features such as copying entire websites, selecting specific files to copy, and setting of download limits to manage bandwidth usage. However, WebHTTrack is less customizable than HTTrack, lacking some advanced customization options.
15 Best Website Downloaders & Website Copier – Save website locally to read offline
The HTTrack Website Copier will help you build a local copy of a website by recursively looking out for URLs on the site, downloading pages, and other site assets (images, CSS, and JS files) until there is no new URL to be crawled.
8 Best HTTrack Alternatives and Similar Software
Without a doubt, HTTrack is a fantastic program, however, if you want something comparable, you may try some utilities below. These 8 HTTrack alternatives run on Windows, Mac, and Linux.

Webrecorder Reviews

We have no reviews of Webrecorder yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Webrecorder should be more popular than HTTrack. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

HTTrack mentions (2)

  • Self Hosted Server For Multiple Types Media
    I Use httrack.com software to download my websites. I am aware of the following software: Ubooquity, TrueNas, Kavita, Plex, MediaMonkey, Jellyfin and MusicBrainzPicard. Source: over 2 years ago
  • How to make RSS download further into the past?
    - I do get the entire text through RSS successfully. - Turns out InoReader caches everything and will never delete it which is why they have it fetched so far back.. - I tried httrack.com without success. - I'm thinking about someone coding something to download each feed post as a PDF, which InoReader gives as a download option for single items. Source: almost 4 years ago

Webrecorder mentions (4)

  • How to archive the tweets and replies of my own terminated twitter account(s)
    Try Conifer, it's free for 5 GB of data. You get a virtual browser inside their website and every page you navigate to is automatically saved to a WARC file (look it up). Source: over 3 years ago
  • How can I save websites to Wayback Machine that has content behind an account lock?
    Probably try : https://conifer.rhizome.org/ or https://webrecorder.net/ (all previously webrecorder.io). Then you can export your saved pages file into archive.org (but my guess not in the Wayback Machine). Source: almost 4 years ago
  • Family member died - archiving their sites?
    You could crawl them using Conifer and keep the crawls private, then download the WARC files. WARC or Web Archive files can be 'played' back using any web archive playback software. ReplayWeb is a good one. Source: about 4 years ago
  • My mother just passed away. She wrote extensively on this website. What can I do to archive everything she wrote?
    Https://conifer.rhizome.org/ is what you're looking for. Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing HTTrack and Webrecorder, you can also consider the following products

WebCopy - Cyotek WebCopy is a free tool for copying full or partial websites locally onto your harddisk for offline viewing.

ArchiveBox - The open-source, self-hosted internet archiving solution

GNU Wget - GNU Wget is a free software package for retrieving files using HTTP(S) and FTP, the most...

SiteSucker - SiteSucker is a Macintosh application that automatically downloads Web sites from the Internet.

Archive.org - Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library offering free universal access to books, movies...

Offline Explorer - MetaProducts Offline Explorer is a Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/Vista program that allows you to...