Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

HTTP Commander VS Oracle TimesTen

Compare HTTP Commander VS Oracle TimesTen and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

HTTP Commander logo HTTP Commander

Web file access system for your Active Directory users and Windows file system. Must have for educational and other organisations with Windows users.

Oracle TimesTen logo Oracle TimesTen

TimesTen is an in-memory, relational database management system with persistence and...
  • HTTP Commander Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-14
  • Oracle TimesTen Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-17

HTTP Commander features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    HTTP Commander provides a user-friendly and intuitive interface that resembles standard file explorers, which makes it easy for users to navigate and manage files online without any steep learning curve.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    The tool is web-based, allowing users to access and manage files from various operating systems, such as Windows, macOS, and Linux, using any modern web browser.
  • Security Features
    Comes with robust security features including user authentication, permissions management, and SSL support, ensuring files are accessed and shared securely.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Offers integration options with existing systems and applications, such as ASP.NET, making it versatile for businesses to incorporate into their environment.
  • Rich File Management Features
    Supports a wide range of file management operations like upload, download, delete, rename, and edit, as well as advanced options like zip/unzip and text editor functionalities.

Possible disadvantages of HTTP Commander

  • Limited Offline Access
    As a web-based application, HTTP Commander requires an internet connection, which might be a limitation for users needing offline access or those in areas with poor connectivity.
  • Setup Complexity
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex, especially for users without technical expertise or experience with ASP.NET applications.
  • Dependency on Web Browsers
    Since it relies on web browsers, performance can be affected by browser-specific issues and inconsistencies.
  • Licensing Costs
    The software may involve licensing costs, which could be a consideration for small businesses or personal users looking for free alternatives.
  • Scalability Concerns
    While suitable for small to medium-sized environments, there might be limitations or performance issues when scaling up to handle very large datasets or numerous concurrent users.

Oracle TimesTen features and specs

  • High Performance
    Oracle TimesTen is an in-memory database providing extremely fast data access and transaction processing, which is beneficial for applications that require real-time performance.
  • Low Latency
    Since the database is stored in memory, data retrieval and manipulation are very quick, reducing latency significantly compared to disk-based databases.
  • Scalability
    TimesTen can be easily scaled to handle large volumes of data and transaction loads, supporting hybrid configurations with Oracle Database to extend scalability and reliability.
  • SQL Compatibility
    It supports SQL and PL/SQL, making it easier for developers experienced with Oracle databases to use TimesTen without a steep learning curve.
  • High Availability
    TimesTen offers features like replication and failover for high availability which is crucial for mission-critical applications.
  • Integration with Oracle Ecosystem
    TimesTen integrates well with other tools and products in the Oracle ecosystem, allowing for seamless operations across different Oracle platforms.

Possible disadvantages of Oracle TimesTen

  • Cost
    Oracle TimesTen can be expensive compared to some of its open-source alternatives, making it less attractive for smaller businesses or projects with limited budgets.
  • Hardware Dependency
    Being an in-memory database, it requires machines with large RAM capacities to store substantial datasets, which can be a limiting factor.
  • Complexity
    Setting up and managing TimesTen can be complex, especially when trying to optimize for performance and ensure data consistency across systems.
  • Limited Community Support
    Unlike more popular database systems, the community support for TimesTen is limited, which means troubleshooting and problem-solving might not be as straightforward.
  • Data Volatility
    Since TimesTen stores data in memory, there’s a risk of data loss in the event of power failures, despite having persistence features to mitigate this risk.

HTTP Commander videos

Web file manager HTTP Commander Active Directory integration: 10 minutes to install and configure

Oracle TimesTen videos

My demo of Oracle TimesTen in memory DB with Free Developer Day tools with a VirtualBox VM appliance

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to HTTP Commander and Oracle TimesTen)
Cloud Storage
100 100%
0% 0
Databases
0 0%
100% 100
File Sharing
100 100%
0% 0
Relational Databases
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using HTTP Commander and Oracle TimesTen. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing HTTP Commander and Oracle TimesTen, you can also consider the following products

FileRun - Beautiful, fast and reliable selfhosted file sharing and sync.

Matisse - Matisse is a post-relational SQL database.

PHPfileNavigator - PHPfileNavigator: Administrador de ficheros y directorios via web.

Datahike - A durable datalog database adaptable for distribution.

HRCloud2 - A full-featured home-hosted Cloud Drive & Personal Assistant.

Valentina Server - Valentina Server is 3 in 1: Valentina DB Server / SQLite Server / Report Server