Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

HTMLEmail.io VS Draft.js

Compare HTMLEmail.io VS Draft.js and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

HTMLEmail.io logo HTMLEmail.io

Responsive HTML email templates for startups & developers

Draft.js logo Draft.js

Rich Text Editor Framework for React
  • HTMLEmail.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-14
  • Draft.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-29

HTMLEmail.io features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    HTMLEmail.io offers a user-friendly interface and pre-designed templates, making it accessible for users with various levels of technical expertise.
  • Time-Saving
    The platform provides ready-to-use email templates that significantly reduce the time required to design and code HTML emails from scratch.
  • Responsive Design
    The templates are designed to be responsive, ensuring that emails look great on both desktop and mobile devices.
  • Cross-Client Compatibility
    HTMLEmail.io ensures that their templates are tested and compatible with a wide range of email clients, reducing the risk of rendering issues.
  • Customization Options
    The platform allows for customization of templates, giving users the flexibility to tailor the designs to their specific needs.

Possible disadvantages of HTMLEmail.io

  • Limited Free Options
    HTMLEmail.io offers a limited number of free templates, which may not be sufficient for users looking for a variety of design choices without paying.
  • Dependency on Third-Party Service
    Reliance on an external service for email templates can be a downside if the service goes down or if there are any issues with the platform.
  • Potential Learning Curve
    While the interface is user-friendly, users who are not familiar with HTML or CSS might still face a learning curve when customizing templates.
  • Cost for Premium Features
    Access to the full range of templates and advanced customization options typically requires a paid subscription, which might not fit everyone's budget.
  • Limited Design Originality
    Using pre-designed templates might reduce the uniqueness of email designs, as other users may be using the same templates.

Draft.js features and specs

  • Rich Text Editing
    Draft.js provides a powerful framework for building rich text editors with a high level of customization, allowing developers to implement various formatting and styling options with ease.
  • Immutable.js Integration
    Draft.js uses Immutable.js to manage editor state, which can lead to improved performance and easier state management, as it helps avoid unnecessary re-renders and mutations.
  • Extensibility
    The library offers the ability to create custom blocks, decorations, and plugins, enabling developers to extend and tailor the editor's behavior to their specific needs.
  • Facebook Support
    Draft.js is developed and maintained by Facebook, which suggests a certain level of reliability and indicates a strong backing in terms of updates and community support.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    The library is well-documented, with comprehensive guides and examples that help developers get started quickly and understand the full potential of the framework.

Possible disadvantages of Draft.js

  • Complexity
    Draft.js has a steep learning curve, especially for developers who are not familiar with React or Immutable.js, as it requires understanding its unique architecture and concepts.
  • Bundle Size
    The inclusion of Immutable.js can lead to a larger bundle size for web applications, which might be a concern for developers aiming for minimalistic and fast-loading applications.
  • Limited Built-in Features
    Draft.js provides a basic editor out of the box, which means developers often need to implement or find third-party plugins for advanced features like tables, embedded media, or collaborative editing.
  • Customizability Overhead
    While high customizability is a strength, it also means that basic implementations may involve more boilerplate code and setup compared to other, more out-of-the-box solutions.
  • Sparse Updates
    Draft.js does not receive updates as frequently as some other open-source projects, which can lead to uncertainty around the timeline for bug fixes or new feature implementations.

HTMLEmail.io videos

Mailgun: Tips on Building HTML Emails

Draft.js videos

Live coding – Draft.js copy-paste fix

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to HTMLEmail.io and Draft.js)
Email Marketing
100 100%
0% 0
Text Editors
0 0%
100% 100
Email Newsletters
100 100%
0% 0
Rich Text Editor
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using HTMLEmail.io and Draft.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Draft.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 26 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

HTMLEmail.io mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of HTMLEmail.io yet. Tracking of HTMLEmail.io recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Draft.js mentions (26)

  • Lexical 0.24 with Vanilla JS: Getting started
    Lexical is an open source project and considered the successor of Draft.js. It is primarily developed by Meta, licensed under MIT. It is not restricted to React, but supports Vanilla JS, too. The flexibility enables us to integrate it with other JS libraries such as Svelte and Vue. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Ask HN: Is there a licensable/free version of the "Substack" email editor?
    - https://draftjs.org/ If you're talking about liking the full experience with settings and previews, that I'm afraid is all custom built. I can't imagine an open source reusable one being out there, but I could be wrong! - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Which Rich Text Editor to use ?
    I've always used Quill and always satisfied with it. It can be adapted to React Native as well. Despite the most popular RTE is Draft js it has some limitations on mobile. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Inline styles in draft-js
    To be able to create an editor, the only requirement is to know how to set up a ReactJS (or NextJs) project. We're going to use draft-js and contenido packages in this tutorial. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • A brief introduction to draft-js
    Briefly and as the draft-js official site says, its a. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing HTMLEmail.io and Draft.js, you can also consider the following products

Templates by Email Monster - Hundreds of free, responsive email templates. Pick and edit.

Quill - Powerful, API-driven rich text editor

Stripo - Stripo is an all-in-one email design platform. We enable our clients to build emails of any complexity, including interactive AMP emails, really fast and easy.

Trix - A rich text editor for everyday writing.

Startup Emails - Responsive HTML email templates for startups

Editor.js - A block-styled editor with clean JSON output