Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Html Screen Capture JS VS jsdom

Compare Html Screen Capture JS VS jsdom and see what are their differences

Html Screen Capture JS logo Html Screen Capture JS

Html Screen Capture JS is an open-source, lightweight, and fully customizable javascript/typescript library that captures a complete layout or a few areas of a layout and saves it in a mini HTML file for the user.

jsdom logo jsdom

A JavaScript implementation of various web standards, for use with Node.js - jsdom/jsdom
  • Html Screen Capture JS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-18
  • jsdom Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-29

Html Screen Capture JS features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Html Screen Capture JS is easy to implement and use, making it approachable for developers of all skill levels to integrate screen capturing functionality into their web applications.
  • No Server Dependency
    The library operates entirely in the client-side environment, eliminating the need for server-side processing or storage, which simplifies deployment and enhances privacy.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source software, it allows developers to review, modify, and distribute the code as needed, fostering a collaborative community for improvements and customizations.
  • Customizability
    Developers can customize the capturing process to suit their needs, such as choosing specific elements to capture, which offers flexibility in how the tool is applied.
  • Interactive Features
    The tool captures more than just static imagery by preserving interactive and dynamic elements of the webpage, providing richer capture capabilities.

Possible disadvantages of Html Screen Capture JS

  • Browser Support
    Compatibility might be limited to modern browsers, potentially excluding users of older or non-standard browsers, which can be a significant drawback for some projects.
  • Performance Overhead
    Capturing complex or large web pages may cause performance slowdowns, particularly on less powerful devices, potentially leading to a suboptimal user experience.
  • Security Restrictions
    The functionality might be restricted by browser security policies, such as cross-origin restrictions, which could limit its ability to capture content from different domains.
  • Limited Use Cases
    The library may not be suited for all types of content or user experiences, particularly where fidelity or compliance with specific standards is required.
  • Dependency Management
    As an external library, it introduces a dependency that developers need to manage, tracking updates and compatibility with other packages used in their projects.

jsdom features and specs

  • Browser-like Environment
    jsdom provides a virtual representation of the browser's DOM environment, which allows developers to run scripts that usually require a browser.
  • Node.js Integration
    Being a Node.js library, jsdom can be easily integrated into server-side applications, enabling server-side DOM manipulation.
  • Testing Facilitation
    jsdom is commonly used in testing frameworks to simulate browser environments, allowing for headless testing of front-end code.
  • Standard-compliant
    jsdom strives to be compliant with web standards, which ensures consistent behavior with real browser environments.
  • Rich API
    It provides a rich set of APIs that mimic the browser DOM, making it comprehensive for developers needing browser-like functionality.

Possible disadvantages of jsdom

  • Performance Overhead
    jsdom can be slower than real browser environments because it runs in Node.js and not in a optimized browser engine.
  • Limited Browser Features
    While jsdom supports many DOM features, it might not support all the modern APIs and features available in the latest browsers.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running multiple jsdom instances can be resource-intensive, which may not be ideal for applications with large-scale DOM manipulation.
  • JavaScript Only
    Being specific to JavaScript and Node.js, jsdom is not suitable for developers working primarily in other programming environments.
  • Complexity in Setup
    Setting up and configuring jsdom for specific use cases can be more complex compared to some alternatives, requiring more effort from the developer.

Html Screen Capture JS videos

No Html Screen Capture JS videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

jsdom videos

JSDom & Enzyme: Different Test Styles for React Apps - Dan La Feir @ ReactNYC

More videos:

  • Review - Frontend Pairing - Discovering missing JSDOM APIs that didn’t allow to test Toast UI in jest

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Html Screen Capture JS and jsdom)
Browser Testing
36 36%
64% 64
Automated Testing
24 24%
76% 76
Development
44 44%
56% 56
Tool
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Html Screen Capture JS and jsdom. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, jsdom seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 32 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Html Screen Capture JS mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Html Screen Capture JS yet. Tracking of Html Screen Capture JS recommendations started around Jul 2021.

jsdom mentions (32)

  • Proton: Pluggable SSR + DOM | Or How I implemented better SSR from scratch
    Nah, I took a third path - looking for alternatives to JSDOM... And I found it - happy-dom. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • The Future of Htmx
    We do have pseudo-browsers written in pure js that you can theoretically use: https://github.com/jsdom/jsdom but they're about as reliable as you can expect: it's difficult to keep up the pace with the big three (or two) on standards compliance, and they usually don't even try. So the only reliable solution is a headless Chromium, Firefox, and/or WebKit-based noname browser like the sibling says.... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Go-DOM - A headless browser written in Go.
    Internally the test starts an HTTP server. Because the this runs in the test process, mocking and stubbing of business logic is possible. The test use jsdom to communicate with the HTTP server; which both parse the HTML response into a DOM, but also executes client-side script in a sandbox which has been initialised, e.g. With window as the global scope.3. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Excluding Dependencies: Bundling for Node and the Browser
    For example, I needed to parse an HTML string into a DOM Document. The browser already supports the DOMParser class, which is, unfortunately, not available in Node.js. Here, I have to fall back on JSDOM, which also exposes this class. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Migrating from Jest to Vitest for your React Application
    If you happen to be using React Testing Library in your project, you'll need to keep the jsdom dev dependency installed. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Html Screen Capture JS and jsdom, you can also consider the following products

html2canvas - JavaScript library to take "screenshots" of webpages or parts of it, directly on the...

BackstopJS - BackstopJS is an open-source tool that allows the user to capture screenshots of a complete webpage or only specific areas of the webpage.

Cypress.io - Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.

Expo Screen Capture - Expo Screen Capture is a highly efficient tool that empowers users to prevent screens in their applications from being captured or taped.

puppeteer - Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome or Chromium...

DOM to Image - JavaScript library to generate an image from a DOM node using HTML5 canvas.