Software Alternatives & Reviews

Hiptest VS FitNesse

Compare Hiptest VS FitNesse and see what are their differences

Hiptest logo Hiptest

Continuous testing platform for Agile & DevOps teams

FitNesse logo FitNesse

FitNesse is a fully integrated standalone wiki and acceptance testing framework.
  • Hiptest Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-19
  • FitNesse Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-01

Hiptest videos

BDD with HipTest

More videos:

  • Demo - Live demo of test automation with Hiptest
  • Tutorial - Hiptest 201 SmartBear Academy Tutorial

FitNesse videos

No FitNesse videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Hiptest and FitNesse)
QA
82 82%
18% 18
Automated Testing
0 0%
100% 100
Testing
63 63%
37% 37
Software Testing
79 79%
21% 21

User comments

Share your experience with using Hiptest and FitNesse. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, FitNesse seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Hiptest mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Hiptest yet. Tracking of Hiptest recommendations started around Mar 2021.

FitNesse mentions (3)

  • Is there a feasible preimage attack for any hash function today?
    (I notified the Martin and the FitNesse user mailing list about this back in 2010. I assume their threat model is that the default hash function is about the same as a closed office door - a request to stay out, or at least knock first - rather than a strong preventative measure.) "Uncle" Bob Martin's "FitNesse", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FitNesse and http://fitnesse.org/ , uses its own hash function, at... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Why Gherkin (Cucumber, SpecFlow,…) Always Failed with UI Test Automation?
    Cucumber is not the first failed test framework that uses English-like syntax for automated testing (it may be for other uses, but definitely not real test automation). Do you still remember FitNesse (it was quite big about 10 years ago, an example here)? Now it is hardly mentioned. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • 10 Tips On How To Improve UI/UX Design of a Web Application
    In-house testing tools help you to differentiate what people say and what they actually do with a product by testing it. FitNesse and Bugwolf are pretty good at this. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Hiptest and FitNesse, you can also consider the following products

TestRail - TestRail provides comprehensive test case management for software testing. Organize your testing, boost productivity, get real-time insights, and track progress toward milestones. Integrates with leading issue tracking and test automation tools.

Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

Qase - Test case management software for QA and development teams that helps you make your product better.

Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...

Zephyr - Zephyr is a small real-time operating system for connected, resource-constrained devices supporting...

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.