Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Harp VS Zepto.js

Compare Harp VS Zepto.js and see what are their differences

Harp logo Harp

The static web server with built-in preprocessing.

Zepto.js logo Zepto.js

Zepto is a minimalist JavaScript library for modern browsers with a largely jQuery-compatible API.
  • Harp Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-10-10
  • Zepto.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-30

Harp features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Harp is known for its simplicity and ease of use, making it accessible for both beginners and experienced developers. It provides a straightforward environment to set up and manage static sites quickly.
  • Built-in Preprocessing
    Harp automatically preprocesses files like Markdown, LESS, and EJS, reducing the need for additional build tools. This streamlines development by allowing developers to use these languages without manual configuration.
  • Rapid Development with Live Reload
    Harp offers live reloading, enabling developers to see changes in real-time without refreshing the browser manually, which speeds up the development process.
  • Focused on Static Content
    Harp is specifically designed for creating and managing static websites, providing features tailored to this use case and avoiding unnecessary complexity found in more comprehensive frameworks.
  • Minimal Configuration
    The platform requires minimal configuration to get started, which reduces the learning curve and accelerates setup, allowing developers to focus on coding rather than setup issues.

Possible disadvantages of Harp

  • Limited Flexibility
    Being a static site generator, Harp lacks the flexibility and features of dynamic web applications or CMSs, which may not meet the needs of more robust or interactive projects.
  • Community and Support
    Harp has a smaller community compared to other static site generators or frameworks, which can lead to challenges in finding help, resources, or plugins when needed.
  • No Built-in Deployment
    Harp does not provide a built-in method for deploying sites to hosting platforms, requiring developers to configure deployment separately using tools like Rsync, FTP, or third-party services.
  • Feature Limitations
    Due to its focus on simplicity, Harp lacks some advanced features that other static site generators might offer, which could be limiting for complex site requirements.
  • Stagnation Concerns
    As of the latest updates, Harp does not receive frequent updates compared to more actively developed projects, raising concerns about future feature developments and maintenance.

Zepto.js features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Zepto.js is extremely lightweight, with a file size significantly smaller than jQuery. This reduces load times and improves performance on webpages, particularly important for mobile users with limited bandwidth.
  • jQuery Compatibility
    Zepto.js aims to offer a jQuery-compatible syntax, making it easy for developers familiar with jQuery to adopt Zepto.js without a steep learning curve.
  • Optimized for Modern Browsers
    Zepto.js is optimized for modern browsers and takes advantage of advanced features like CSS3 and HTML5, which can lead to improved performance and more elegant solutions.
  • Modular Design
    Zepto.js has a modular architecture, allowing developers to include only the features they need. This can further reduce the size of the library and improve page load times.

Possible disadvantages of Zepto.js

  • Limited Legacy Browser Support
    Zepto.js does not support older versions of Internet Explorer (like IE8 and below), which may be a limitation for projects needing to cater to a wide audience with deprecated browser support.
  • Fewer Features than jQuery
    Although Zepto.js is similar to jQuery, it lacks some of the more advanced features and plugins available in jQuery, which might require additional solutions for certain tasks.
  • Small Community
    Zepto.js has a smaller user base and community compared to jQuery, which may result in less community support, fewer tutorials, and limited plugin options.
  • Limited Official Documentation
    The official documentation for Zepto.js is not as extensive as that for jQuery, which may require developers to spend extra time understanding and troubleshooting code.

Harp videos

Harp Review - 10 harps from 50$ to 15.000$ - comparison guide

More videos:

  • Review - Westside Discs Harp Review and Giveaway! | Danny Lindahl
  • Review - Dusty Strings Harp Review

Zepto.js videos

Data-binding Techniques | CSS Techniques | Zepto.js | The Treehouse Show Episode 97

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Harp and Zepto.js)
Blogging
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
23 23%
77% 77
JavaScript Framework
40 40%
60% 60
JS Library
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Harp and Zepto.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Zepto.js should be more popular than Harp. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Harp mentions (1)

  • Is there a technology for reusing HTML components?
    Sounds like what you want is a static site generator. I've used Harp for a long time but I'm not sure it's really maintained these days, so you might also look at 11ty. Source: almost 3 years ago

Zepto.js mentions (4)

  • TinyJS – Shorten JavaScript QuerySelect with $ and $$
    jQuery II: The Quickening! If anybody's interested in a more minimalist jQuery-like tool check out Zepto [1]. I built a toy Golang SSR project using it and felt like I was 17 again. Also of note is that "Highlander II" takes place in the year 2024 [2]. It's a sign! Everything old is new again! `$` is immortal! [1] http://zeptojs.com/ [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Highlander_II:_The_Quickening. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • jQuery v4.0.0 Beta
    > I've always thought there should be a modern, lightweight jQuery alternative like this. Have you heard of Zepto? https://zeptojs.com. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Discovered a 63kb tiddlywiki like self saving HTML+JS wiki and its looking cool
    I once made a very crude and simple TiddlyWiki work-alike I called "HulloWurld" https://github.com/calroc/HulloWurld It's 143 KB, but it includes copies of Knockout, Underscore, Zepto, and the "Marked" markdown parser... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ ( Good stuff BTW: http://knockoutjs.com/ http://underscorejs.org/ https://zeptojs.com/ https://github.com/chjj/marked ) Probably the only interesting bit is the code to save the page:... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • Replacing jQuery (110kb) With UmbrellaJS (8kb)
    I think zepto.js is a better choice. It's slightly bigger than cash but much closer to jquery (for example it has $.ajax) https://zeptojs.com. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Harp and Zepto.js, you can also consider the following products

Metalsmith - An extremely simple, pluggable static site generator.

jQuery - The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.

GitHub Pages - A free, static web host for open-source projects on GitHub

AngularJS - AngularJS lets you extend HTML vocabulary for your application. The resulting environment is extraordinarily expressive, readable, and quick to develop.

DHTMLX - JavaScript Library for cross-platform web and mobile app development with HTML5 JavaScript widgets. Easy integration with popular JavaScript Frameworks.

ExpressJS - Sinatra inspired web development framework for node.js -- insanely fast, flexible, and simple