Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Harp VS DHTMLX

Compare Harp VS DHTMLX and see what are their differences

LibHunt
LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Harp logo Harp

The static web server with built-in preprocessing.

DHTMLX logo DHTMLX

JavaScript Library for cross-platform web and mobile app development with HTML5 JavaScript widgets. Easy integration with popular JavaScript Frameworks.
  • Harp Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-10-10
  • DHTMLX Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-27

Harp features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Harp is known for its simplicity and ease of use, making it accessible for both beginners and experienced developers. It provides a straightforward environment to set up and manage static sites quickly.
  • Built-in Preprocessing
    Harp automatically preprocesses files like Markdown, LESS, and EJS, reducing the need for additional build tools. This streamlines development by allowing developers to use these languages without manual configuration.
  • Rapid Development with Live Reload
    Harp offers live reloading, enabling developers to see changes in real-time without refreshing the browser manually, which speeds up the development process.
  • Focused on Static Content
    Harp is specifically designed for creating and managing static websites, providing features tailored to this use case and avoiding unnecessary complexity found in more comprehensive frameworks.
  • Minimal Configuration
    The platform requires minimal configuration to get started, which reduces the learning curve and accelerates setup, allowing developers to focus on coding rather than setup issues.

Possible disadvantages of Harp

  • Limited Flexibility
    Being a static site generator, Harp lacks the flexibility and features of dynamic web applications or CMSs, which may not meet the needs of more robust or interactive projects.
  • Community and Support
    Harp has a smaller community compared to other static site generators or frameworks, which can lead to challenges in finding help, resources, or plugins when needed.
  • No Built-in Deployment
    Harp does not provide a built-in method for deploying sites to hosting platforms, requiring developers to configure deployment separately using tools like Rsync, FTP, or third-party services.
  • Feature Limitations
    Due to its focus on simplicity, Harp lacks some advanced features that other static site generators might offer, which could be limiting for complex site requirements.
  • Stagnation Concerns
    As of the latest updates, Harp does not receive frequent updates compared to more actively developed projects, raising concerns about future feature developments and maintenance.

DHTMLX features and specs

  • Comprehensive Suite
    DHTMLX offers a wide range of UI components, from grids and charts to complex Gantt and scheduler components, providing a comprehensive toolkit for web application development.
  • Rich Documentation
    The platform provides extensive documentation, demos, and examples, which are invaluable for developers in understanding and implementing various components efficiently.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    DHTMLX components are designed to be fully compatible across major browsers, ensuring a consistent user experience regardless of the user's environment.
  • Support and Community
    DHTMLX offers various support options including forums and ticket-based support, alongside a strong user community that can provide insights and assistance.
  • Customizability
    The components are highly customizable, allowing developers to tailor them to fit the specific aesthetics and functionality requirements of their projects.

Possible disadvantages of DHTMLX

  • Cost
    While DHTMLX provides a free version, the full suite with advanced features requires a paid license, which can be a drawback for startups or individual developers with limited budgets.
  • Complexity
    With its comprehensive set of features, DHTMLX can have a steep learning curve for newcomers who are unfamiliar with its architecture and functionalities.
  • Dependency on Proprietary Framework
    Using DHTMLX can lead to a dependency on its particular frameworks and methodologies, which might be a concern for projects that prioritize open-source solutions.
  • Performance Overhead
    Implementing multiple DHTMLX components in a single application might introduce performance overhead, which requires optimization to maintain responsiveness.
  • Limited Open Source Contributions
    As a commercial library, DHTMLX might not benefit from as many open source contributions and innovations as purely open-source alternatives.

Harp videos

+ Add

Harp Review - 10 harps from 50$ to 15.000$ - comparison guide

More videos:

  • Review - Westside Discs Harp Review and Giveaway! | Danny Lindahl
  • Review - Dusty Strings Harp Review

DHTMLX videos

+ Add

Dhtmlx Scheduler

More videos:

  • Review - dhtmlxGantt 6.1 Release: Time Constraints, Backward Scheduling, S-curve and dataProcessor Update
  • Review - Dhtmlx-Grid with Flux4 Part2

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Harp and DHTMLX)

Harp

DHTMLX

Blogging
100 100%
Blogging
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
19 19%
Javascript UI Libraries
81% 81
JavaScript Framework
35 35%
JavaScript Framework
65% 65
Development Tools
0 0%
Development Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Harp and DHTMLX. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

DHTMLX might be a bit more popular than Harp. We know about 1 link to it since March 2021 and only 1 link to Harp. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Harp mentions (1)

  • Is there a technology for reusing HTML components?
    Sounds like what you want is a static site generator. I've used Harp for a long time but I'm not sure it's really maintained these days, so you might also look at 11ty. Source: almost 3 years ago

DHTMLX mentions (1)

  • How Much Does It Cost To a Project Management App
    To finish projects on time, efficient time management is a must. To help managers deal with deadlines, we usually implement a fully functional Gantt chart. To create a reliable and user-friendly UI, choosing the right set of tools is essential. In our work, we usually rely on Webix, a JavaScript UI library developed by the brightest minds of XB Software. Another ace up our sleeve is JavaScript UI libraries by... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Harp and DHTMLX, you can also consider the following products

Metalsmith - An extremely simple, pluggable static site generator.

jQuery - The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.

GitHub Pages - A free, static web host for open-source projects on GitHub

Bryntum - High performance web components for SaaS apps - including Gantt, Scheduler, Grid, Calendar and Kanban widgets. Seamless integration with React, Vue, Angular or plain JS apps.

AngularJS - AngularJS lets you extend HTML vocabulary for your application. The resulting environment is extraordinarily expressive, readable, and quick to develop.

Webix UI - An enterprise JavaScript Library for cross-platform app development with HTML5 JavaScript widgets and easy integration with most popular JavaScript Frameworks.

Loading...