Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Hangfire VS HatchBox

Compare Hangfire VS HatchBox and see what are their differences

Hangfire logo Hangfire

An easy way to perform background processing in .NET and .NET Core applications.

HatchBox logo HatchBox

Super easy Rails servers. Configure any server to run Ruby on Rails servers in minutes and without hassle.
  • Hangfire Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-04
  • HatchBox Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-18

Hangfire videos

AK 47 Wasr Hangfire - shooter beware

HatchBox videos

Hatchbox PLA Filament Review

More videos:

  • Review - 🤑💵 Cheap and Great - Hatchbox PLA - Filament Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Hangfire and HatchBox)
Data Integration
100 100%
0% 0
Ruby On Rails
0 0%
100% 100
Web Service Automation
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Computing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Hangfire and HatchBox. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, HatchBox should be more popular than Hangfire. It has been mentiond 20 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Hangfire mentions (5)

  • Do I need message queues for sending emails/texts via services like SendGrid, AWS SES, Twilio etc.? How do you decide if you need message queues or not? What questions do you ask yourself?
    Hangfire (https://hangfire.io) includes default exception handling and is very extensible, I think it's a good mid-level choice and a good alternative to other queue mechanism, if you can't afford to host a separated queue service or can't manage a separated service; also scales pretty well (you can have multiple servers handling the same background job queue, or different queues). It runs on Sql Server and MySql... Source: almost 2 years ago
  • jsonb in postgres and should I use it or not?
    I used to just use hangfire.io in .net and worked wonderfully for any long running tasks or schedules. Had a great queuing system, UI to know if they failed , etc. That's how I'd send emails, pdf's, and other things along that nature. Then if it were more just a db related operation, just setup a schedule in mssql job service. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • How can In make a function run at a certain date in the future?
    You can use hangfire for cronjob, to run at a time in future, you can use Hangfire.Schedule(jobid, datetime). Source: about 2 years ago
  • How to handle processing of an entity through different states?
    So another option is to use something like https://hangfire.io to pull the jobs and process them? Source: about 2 years ago
  • How to update database in a Parallel.For loop?
    I've got a fairly large process I need to handle in background on my .net core web app so I've exported it to a background task using Hangfire. Source: almost 3 years ago

HatchBox mentions (20)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Hangfire and HatchBox, you can also consider the following products

Sidekiq - Sidekiq is a simple, efficient framework for background job processing in Ruby

Cloud 66 - Everything you need to run your code on any cloud.

Enqueue It - Easy and scalable solution for manage and execute background tasks seamlessly in .NET applications. It allows you to schedule, queue, and process your jobs and microservices efficiently.

Fly.io - Edge computing is the new frontier.

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

LibHunt - LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives.