Growth Marketing Checklists VS Brisk

Growth Marketing Checklists Reviews

1. Dan    

   Co-founder at Cenario | over 3 years ago
   Curated this huge resource to help marketers, founders & makers.

   I created Growth Marketing checklists to help founders, marketers & indie hackers with their marketing efforts 😊

   I wanted to create something that was going to be useful for me to grow side projects + help with the startup I'm working for.

   I’ve included lots of checklists with more being added soon 😊

   👉Activation Strategies Checklist 👉Retention Strategies Checklist 👉Facebook Ads Checklist 👉SaaS Marketing Metrics & KPI's 👉Google Ads checklist 👉Inbound Marketing Campaign Checklist 👉Product Launch Checklist 👉On-Page SEO Checklist 👉Email Marketing Automation Checklist 👉UX Design Checklist (for Marketers) 👉Outbound Marketing Checklist 👉Partnerships for Startups checklist 👉Content Marketing checklist

   Hopefully you may see value in them for you 😊

   👍 Pros:    Easy to digest|Detailed

Brisk Reviews

Growth Marketing Checklists mentions (0)

Brisk mentions (9)

• We built the fastest CI in the world. It failed

  I'm having a very similar issue getting https://brisktest.com/ out there. People complain about things like the speed of their build system, but convincing people that your CI system is faster just seems like an uphill battle. Maybe the era of launching new indie dev tools to developers is over and you just need a massive marketing budget to bombard devs with advertising and lots of sponsored content. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

• New CI/CD tool focused on speed

  Hi everyone, I'm Sean I'm the creator of Brisk a new CI/CD tool. I'd love to share a little bit about it with the community and get any feedback you might have. Source: 10 months ago

• No one cares about Bun's speed. Your CI does though

  Paul, if you are interested in speeding up your tests for either Bun or Jest you might be interested in checking out my latest project. At Brisk we keep pre-built workers for your project in our infrastructure so there is no build time that eats in to your test time. This also means there isn't as much of a concurrency penalty that you get with traditional CI services (scaling up to 30 workers only to spend 30... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

• Launch HN: Moonrepo (YC W23) – Open-source build system

  We've had a lot of success with Brisk (https://brisktest.com/) doing this exact thing. It keeps our environment running so we don't have to rebuild on every run, kind of like a dev build. It's really fast. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

• Act: Run your GitHub Actions locally

  Super interesting you mention “local first CI”. Have a look at Brisk https://brisktest.com/ (I’m the author). It’s designed to work “locally” pre-commit, giving you super fast tests, but then when you push you can also use it in your CI/CD pipeline. We achieve the speed with massive concurrency and pre-built environments, it was built as a drop in replacement for your local test runner. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago