GraphQL Cache VS Digicert

'id' data type and field to help support caching: https://graphql.org/learn/caching/. Source: over 1 year ago

> Take a look at this. I repeat: client-side caching is not a problem, even with GraphQL. The technical problems regarding GraphQL's blockers to caching lies in server-side caching. For server-side caching, the only answer that GraphQL offers is to use primary keys, hand-wave a lot, and hope that your GraphQL implementation did some sort of optimization to handle that corner case by caching results. Don't take my... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

> Checkout Relay.js: https://relay.dev/ Relay is a GraphQL client. That's the irrelevant side of caching, because that can be trivially implemented by an intern, specially given GraphQL's official copout of caching based on primary keys [1], and doesn't have any meaningful impact on the client's resources. The relevant side of caching is server-side caching: the bits of your system that allow it to fulfill... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

This is clever! Can anyone help me understand how this lines up with the original value proposition of GraphQL? I was under the impression that the Big Idea behind GraphQL was, amongst other things, client-side caching[1]. I’m probably missing some nuance here, so bear with me: if your GraphQL client is caching properly, then what would this syntax give a developer that a URL query parameter parser couldn’t? [1]... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

To add to what others have said while trying and failing to be technical about it. This is normal. The web browser is saying this because it has no way to tell if the site you are trying to go to is the real site or has been faked in some way. So this warning just means you need to make sure on your own that what you are connecting to is what you think you are connecting to. When going to a site out on the... Source: over 1 year ago