Grade.us
Birdeye
Podium
ReviewTrackers
Reputation.com
Qualtrics
NiceJob
Survicate
Coveralls
CodeClimate
Codacy
SonarQube
SensioLabs Insight
ESLint
Codecov
Source-Navigator NG
Grade.us is a review marketing platform with a growing suite of tools to: (1) convert happy customers into reviewers ("review-gen"); (2) recover disgruntled customers and pre-empt negative reviews; (3) monitor customer reviews across scores of third-party review sites in real-time; and (4) capture and amplify the business's positive reviews to reach a broader audience.
Grade.us is best suited to marketers and agenies who want an easy and flexible toolset to implement review marketing on their own terms, under their own brand, either as a standalone offering or within a larger product suite. With its growing reporting and analytics capability, Grade.us has quickly become the solution for creating and optimizing reputation and review marketing campaigns across a wide range of industries.
Grade.us CoverallsBased on our record, Coveralls seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 13 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Cpan_coverage: This calculates the coverage of your test suite and reports the results. It also uploads the results to coveralls.io. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
I will normally use GitHub Actions to automatically run my test suite on each push, on every major version of Perl I support. One of the test runs will load Devel::Cover and use it to upload test coverage data to Codecov and Coveralls. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Coveralls.io — Display test coverage reports, free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Several years ago I got into Travis CI and set up lots of my GitHub repos so they automatically ran the tests each time I committed to the repo. Later on, I also worked out how to tie those test runs into Coveralls.io so I got pretty graphs of how my test coverage was looking. I gave a talk about what I had done. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
This approach will create two json coverage files, which will be merged together by NYC. Therefore the results will be purely local. If You don't mind using online tools like Codecov or Coveralls for merging data from different tests, then go ahead and use them. They will probably also be more accurate. But if You still want to learn how to get coverage from E2E, then please read through. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
Birdeye - #1 most trusted reputation and customer experience platform for local business
CodeClimate - Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.
Podium - Podium helps your business get more customer reviews, manage customer feedback, customer interaction, and online review management from one software.
Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.
ReviewTrackers - Software that generates new customer reviews, engages your customers and lets you listen and...
SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.
