Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Google Test VS TestNG

Compare Google Test VS TestNG and see what are their differences

Google Test logo Google Test

Google Test is a unit testing for C++ programming language that is based on xUnit architecture.

TestNG logo TestNG

TestNG is a testing framework.
  • Google Test Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-03
  • TestNG Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-06-12

Google Test features and specs

  • Widely Used
    Google Test is one of the most widely used C++ testing frameworks, which means it has a large community and plenty of resources and third-party integrations available.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    The documentation for Google Test is extensive and well-structured, making it easier for developers to learn and use the framework effectively.
  • Platform Independence
    Google Test supports multiple platforms, including Linux, Windows, and macOS, which enhances the adaptability and flexibility of using it across different environments.
  • Advanced Features
    Google Test provides a variety of advanced features such as parameterized tests, fatal and non-fatal assertions, and type-parameterized tests, allowing for more complex test scenarios.
  • Active Maintenance
    As an open-source project maintained by Google, Google Test receives regular updates and improvements, contributing to its stability and reliability.

Possible disadvantages of Google Test

  • C++ Specific
    Google Test is specifically designed for C++ code, which limits its use to C++ projects and prevents it from being directly applicable to other programming languages.
  • Complexity for Beginners
    The extensive feature set and flexibility can present a steep learning curve for beginners who may initially find it overwhelming to grasp all the available functionalities.
  • Binary Size
    The inclusion of Google Test can potentially increase the binary size of the test program, which might be a concern for projects with strict size limitations.
  • Build Integration
    Although Google Test can be integrated with various build systems, setting it up initially may require additional configuration and understanding of build tools, which can be cumbersome for some developers.
  • Limited GUI Support
    Google Test primarily outputs results in a textual format, and while there are third-party tools to integrate GUI support, it doesn't inherently provide a graphical user interface to visualize test results.

TestNG features and specs

  • Parallel Testing
    TestNG allows the execution of tests in parallel, which can greatly reduce the time required for test execution by making full use of available resources.
  • Annotations
    TestNG uses more powerful and flexible annotations compared to JUnit, which provide greater control over the setup, execution, and teardown of tests.
  • Data-Driven Testing
    It supports data-driven testing through the use of data providers, allowing the execution of tests with multiple sets of data seamlessly.
  • Flexible Test Configuration
    TestNG provides flexible test configuration options, such as setting the order of test methods execution, grouping tests, and allowing dependencies between test methods.
  • Integration with Build Tools
    TestNG easily integrates with popular build tools such as Maven and Gradle, facilitating continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) processes.

Possible disadvantages of TestNG

  • Complexity
    TestNG's extensive feature set can lead to added complexity in test suite configuration, especially for new users who are unfamiliar with the framework.
  • Verbose XML Configuration
    Managing test configurations through XML files can become verbose and hard to maintain, especially for large test suites with numerous configurations.
  • Limited Community Support
    Compared to more established frameworks like JUnit, TestNG has a smaller community, which can limit the availability of tutorials, documentation, and best practices.
  • Steeper Learning Curve
    For teams that have traditionally used other testing tools, the transition to TestNG may involve a steeper learning curve due to its different approach and features.

Google Test videos

No Google Test videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

TestNG videos

TESTNG FAKE DESIGNER ITEMS FROM VOVA - IS IT A SCAM?!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Google Test and TestNG)
HR
100 100%
0% 0
Automated Testing
34 34%
66% 66
Attendance Management Software
Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Google Test and TestNG. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Google Test and TestNG

Google Test Reviews

We have no reviews of Google Test yet.
Be the first one to post

TestNG Reviews

Top 10 Best Selenium Alternatives You Should Try
Important and influential features of TestNG over Selenium are flexible test configuration, powerful execution model, annotations, supports data-driven testing, multi-threading, etc. TestNG means Test Next Generation.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Google Test should be more popular than TestNG. It has been mentiond 21 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Google Test mentions (21)

  • Automatically run tests, formatters & linters with CI!
    Roy's project uses Google Test, a C++ testing framework. His testing setup is similar to mine as we both keep source files in one directory and tests in another. The key difference is that I can run the tests using the Visual Studios run button. It was fairly easy to write the new tests as there were existing ones that I could reference to check the syntax! - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • C++ Unit Testing Using Google Test - My Experience
    One popular C++ Testing Framework is Google Test, and is what I ended up using. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • CI/CD pipelines for embedded
    Not sure about CppUnit but I can speak to my previous experience using the googletest framework which compiles your tests to an executable, and since it's a very simple framework we were able to cross-compile and run directly on our device. We just had to hook up a device to the server that was running the CI so it could flash it when needed. That basically meant that our process was:. Source: about 2 years ago
  • How is programming done in large c++ projects?
    Some C++ unit testing frameworks include googletest, and microsoft's unit testing framework, which doesn't really have a name. Source: over 2 years ago
  • IDE for CPP(leetcode)
    However, you can use a unit test framework like GoogleTest or Catch2 whic creates a main() function for you which allows you to run single functions, as long as they have been created through some preprocessor macros. Then you can use a VS Code test adapter like this or this which may let you run a single test by right clicking it directly in VS Code. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

TestNG mentions (6)

  • Five Advanced Techniques to Improve Automated Testing by 50%
    However, you must note that over-parallelization can cause resource contention and performance issues, so monitor it. Use tools like pytest-monitor, TestNG, and Appium to find your optimal parallel execution configuration. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Top 10 Java Testing Tools Every Developer Should Know
    Inspired by JUnit, TestNG offers advanced features for complex, large-scale testing scenarios, covering unit, functional, integration, and end-to-end tests. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Test Automation: Guide to Selenium with Java and TestNG
    If you’re interested in learning more about TestNG, visit its official website for additional information. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • The Top 15 API Testing Frameworks: Your Ultimate Guide
    Introduction: TestNG is a versatile testing framework that accommodates various testing needs, including unit, functional, and integration testing. It's particularly useful for Java developers looking for a comprehensive solution. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Why does Rusts testing tools seem so much less polished compared to its other tooling?
    Testing tools on the JVM stopped using reflection about twenty years ago, they all use annotations these days (e.g. https://testng.org, https://junit.org). Rust has annotations too, obviously. Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Google Test and TestNG, you can also consider the following products

CPPUnit - CppUnit is the C++ port of the JUnit framework for unit testing.

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.

UnitTest++ - Download JF Unittest for free. A C++ unittest framework, written out of frustration with the existing unittest frameworks out there. No GUI with colorful progress bars, no dependencies on any other package in the world.

Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

UquoniTest - UquoniTest: a unit testing library for C++

Arquillian - Arquillian is an open-source testing platform that offers no more container lifecycle, deployment hassles, and mocks.