Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Google Cloud Load Balancing VS Apache Ignite

Compare Google Cloud Load Balancing VS Apache Ignite and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Google Cloud Load Balancing logo Google Cloud Load Balancing

Google Cloud Load Balancer enables users to scale their applications on Google Compute Engine.

Apache Ignite logo Apache Ignite

high-performance, integrated and distributed in-memory platform for computing and transacting on...
  • Google Cloud Load Balancing Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-29
  • Apache Ignite Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-08

Google Cloud Load Balancing features and specs

  • Global Load Balancing
    Google Cloud Load Balancing allows for distributing traffic across multiple regions, ensuring high availability and reliability by automatically routing traffic to the closest or least loaded backend.
  • Scalability
    Automatically scales up and down based on traffic demands without manual intervention, providing consistent performance during traffic spikes.
  • Integrated Security
    Offers built-in DDoS protection, SSL/TLS termination, and support for IAM roles, enhancing the security of your applications.
  • User-friendly Console
    Provides an easy-to-use interface for configuring and managing load balancers, making deployment and monitoring straightforward.
  • Backend Health Monitoring
    Continuously checks the health of backend services and directs traffic only to healthy instances, ensuring uninterrupted service.
  • Support for Hybrid and Multi-cloud
    Seamlessly integrates with on-premises and other cloud environments, supporting diverse deployment scenarios.

Possible disadvantages of Google Cloud Load Balancing

  • Complex Pricing
    Pricing can be complicated and may not be straightforward to calculate, potentially leading to unexpected costs.
  • Learning Curve
    Being a feature-rich service, it has a steep learning curve for new users unfamiliar with Google Cloud or advanced load balancing concepts.
  • Region Availability
    Although it offers global load balancing, specific features may only be available in certain regions, limiting some capabilities depending on the location.
  • Dependency on Google Cloud Services
    Heavily integrated with other Google Cloud services, which may pose challenges if you need to work with third-party services or other cloud providers.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Advanced configurations might require in-depth understanding and careful planning, potentially increasing the time and effort needed for optimal setup.

Apache Ignite features and specs

  • In-Memory Data Grid
    Apache Ignite provides a robust in-memory data grid that can drastically improve data access speeds by storing data in memory across distributed nodes.
  • Scalability
    The system is designed to scale horizontally, allowing users to add more nodes to handle increased loads, thereby ensuring high availability and performance.
  • Distributed Compute Capabilities
    Ignite supports parallel execution of tasks across cluster nodes, which is beneficial for complex computations and real-time processing.
  • Persistence
    Although primarily in-memory, Ignite offers a durable and transactional Persistence layer that ensures data can be persisted on disk, providing a hybrid in-memory and persistent storage solution.
  • SQL Queries
    Ignite offers support for ANSI-99 SQL, which allows users to execute complex SQL queries across distributed datasets easily.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with existing Hadoop and Spark setups, allowing users to enhance their existing data pipelines with Ignite’s capabilities.
  • Fault Tolerance
    Apache Ignite includes built-in mechanisms for recovery and ensures that data copies are maintained across nodes for resilience against node failures.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Ignite

  • Complexity
    Apache Ignite can be complex to set up and manage, especially when configuring a large, distributed system with multiple nodes.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running an in-memory data grid like Ignite requires significant memory resources, which can increase operational costs.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its comprehensive features and distributed nature, there is a steep learning curve associated with effectively utilizing Ignite.
  • Configuration Overhead
    There is substantial configuration overhead involved to optimize performance and ensure proper cluster management.
  • Community Support
    Although it has active development, the community support might not be as robust compared to other more mature solutions, possibly leading to challenges in finding solutions to niche issues.
  • YARN Dependence
    For those looking to integrate with Hadoop, Ignite's optimal performance is sometimes reliant on Hadoop YARN, which can introduce additional complexity.

Google Cloud Load Balancing videos

No Google Cloud Load Balancing videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Apache Ignite videos

Best Practices for a Microservices Architecture on Apache Ignite

More videos:

  • Review - Apache Ignite + GridGain powering up banks and financial institutions with distributed systems

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Google Cloud Load Balancing and Apache Ignite)
Web Servers
100 100%
0% 0
Databases
0 0%
100% 100
Web And Application Servers
NoSQL Databases
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Google Cloud Load Balancing and Apache Ignite. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Google Cloud Load Balancing should be more popular than Apache Ignite. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Google Cloud Load Balancing mentions (10)

View more

Apache Ignite mentions (3)

  • API Caching: Techniques for Better Performance
    Apache Ignite — Free and open-source, Apache Ignite is a horizontally scalable key-value cache store system with a robust multi-model database that powers APIs to compute distributed data. Ignite provides a security system that can authenticate users' credentials on the server. It can also be used for system workload acceleration, real-time data processing, analytics, and as a graph-centric programming model. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Ask HN: P2P Databases?
    Ignite works as you describe: https://ignite.apache.org/ I wouldn't really recommend this approach, I would think more in terms of subscriptions and topics and less of a 'database'. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • .NET and Apache Ignite: Testing Cache and SQL API features — Part I
    Last days, I started using Apache Ignite as a cache strategy for some applications. Apache Ignite is an open-source In-Memory Data Grid, distributed database, caching, and high-performance computing platform. Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Google Cloud Load Balancing and Apache Ignite, you can also consider the following products

nginx - A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.

AWS Elastic Load Balancing - Amazon ELB automatically distributes incoming application traffic across multiple Amazon EC2 instances in the cloud.

MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.

Azure Traffic Manager - Microsoft Azure Traffic Manager allows you to control the distribution of user traffic for service endpoints in different datacenters.

memcached - High-performance, distributed memory object caching system