Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Google Cloud Functions VS OpenStack

Compare Google Cloud Functions VS OpenStack and see what are their differences

Google Cloud Functions logo Google Cloud Functions

A serverless platform for building event-based microservices.

OpenStack logo OpenStack

OpenStack software controls large pools of compute, storage, and networking resources throughout a datacenter, managed through a dashboard or via the OpenStack API.
  • Google Cloud Functions Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-25
  • OpenStack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-22

Google Cloud Functions videos

Google Cloud Functions: introduction to event-driven serverless compute on GCP

More videos:

  • Review - Building Serverless Applications with Google Cloud Functions (Next '17 Rewind)

OpenStack videos

OpenStack Summit Primer, The Who, What, Why and How of OpenStack

More videos:

  • Review - Red Hat OpenStack Platform GPU use case
  • Review - Performance Analysis Review for Production OpenStack Private Cloud in SaaS

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Google Cloud Functions and OpenStack)
Cloud Computing
50 50%
50% 50
Cloud Hosting
72 72%
28% 28
VPS
0 0%
100% 100
Backend As A Service
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Google Cloud Functions and OpenStack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Google Cloud Functions and OpenStack

Google Cloud Functions Reviews

We have no reviews of Google Cloud Functions yet.
Be the first one to post

OpenStack Reviews

35+ Of The Best CI/CD Tools: Organized By Category
OpenStack is a cloud framework. It provides users and enterprises with horizontal scale infrastructure. Its tools allow you to compute, store and share data and resources. It also provides self-service administration that users can interact with directly.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Google Cloud Functions seems to be a lot more popular than OpenStack. While we know about 43 links to Google Cloud Functions, we've tracked only 2 mentions of OpenStack. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Google Cloud Functions mentions (43)

  • Is Serverless Architecture Right For You?
    The first reason is that serverless architectures are inherently scalable and elastic. They automatically scale up or down based on the incoming workload without requiring manual intervention through serverless compute services like AWS Lambda, Azure Functions, or Google Cloud Functions. - Source: dev.to / 28 days ago
  • A Brief History Of Serverless
    The FaaS platform gained a lot of popularity which resulted in many competitors. There was OSS providers like OpenFaaS or Fission. There were of course the commercial versions to like Azure Functions and Google Cloud Functions. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Increasing Your Cloud Function Development Velocity Using Dynamically Loading Python Classes
    One of the issues developers can encounter when developing in Cloud Functions is the time taken to deploy changes. You can help reduce this time by dynamically loading some of your Python classes. This allows you to make iterative changes to just the area of your application that you’re working on. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Need some advice on API key storage
    I've been looking at Google Secret Manager which sounds promising but I've not been able to find any examples or tutorials that help with the actual practical details of best practice or getting this working. I'm currently reading about Cloud Functions which also sound promising but again, I'm just going deeper and deeper into GCP without feeling like I'm gaining any useful insights. Source: 8 months ago
  • Golden Ticket To Explore Google Cloud
    Serverless computing was also introduced, where the developers focus on their code instead of server configuration.Google offers serverless technologies that include Cloud Functions and Cloud Run.Cloud Functions manages event-driven code and offers a pay-as-you-go service, while Cloud Run allows clients to deploy their containerized microservice applications in a managed environment. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
View more

OpenStack mentions (2)

  • Learn OpenStack by Example: Part 1 - Install DevStack
    In my first post, I looked into what is OpenStack and how, if done right, can be quite a powerful ally in our cloud deployment strategies. In this post, I want to start looking at how we can create an application to learn the basics and components of the system. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
  • Learn OpenStack by examples: Part 0 - Summary and Goals
    While searching for solutions and documentation on the various problems I've come across, I would often see references to OpenStack and it got my curiosity going. What is OpenStack? What services does it offer and who owns it? How do I learn to use it? What are it's costs and limitations? - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Google Cloud Functions and OpenStack, you can also consider the following products

Google App Engine - A powerful platform to build web and mobile apps that scale automatically.

Linode - We make it simple to develop, deploy, and scale cloud infrastructure at the best price-to-performance ratio in the market.Sign up to Linode through SaaSHub and get a $100 in credit!

Salesforce Platform - Salesforce Platform is a comprehensive PaaS solution that paves the way for the developers to test, build, and mitigate the issues in the cloud application before the final deployment.

DigitalOcean - Simplifying cloud hosting. Deploy an SSD cloud server in 55 seconds.

AWS Lambda - Automatic, event-driven compute service

Microsoft Azure - Windows Azure and SQL Azure enable you to build, host and scale applications in Microsoft datacenters.