Google Cloud Functions VS Bunny.net

One of the issues developers can encounter when developing in Cloud Functions is the time taken to deploy changes. You can help reduce this time by dynamically loading some of your Python classes. This allows you to make iterative changes to just the area of your application that you’re working on. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

I've been looking at Google Secret Manager which sounds promising but I've not been able to find any examples or tutorials that help with the actual practical details of best practice or getting this working. I'm currently reading about Cloud Functions which also sound promising but again, I'm just going deeper and deeper into GCP without feeling like I'm gaining any useful insights. Source: 6 months ago

Serverless computing was also introduced, where the developers focus on their code instead of server configuration.Google offers serverless technologies that include Cloud Functions and Cloud Run.Cloud Functions manages event-driven code and offers a pay-as-you-go service, while Cloud Run allows clients to deploy their containerized microservice applications in a managed environment. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago

Lambda is made for your use case :). It doesn’t have to be AWS there are plenty of other serverless computing services like: - Google cloud functions - Azure functions Etc. Source: 11 months ago

Once you have some basic familiarity with programming, try deploying one of your Python programs to the cloud. Start with Cloud Functions, because that doesn't require any knowledge of Linux server administration. Source: 11 months ago

I wanted to migrate a static website from a VPS to a CDN to improve website loading time and SEO performance. After a few searches, I discovered a new sleek CDN called BunnyCDN, which beats all performance charts in latency with an average of 40ms. That's what I was looking for! - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

This is great news. Now I can utilize any CDN provider that supports S3. Like bunny.net [1] which has image optimization, just like Supabase does but with better pricing and features. I have been developing with Supabase past two months. I would say there are still some rough corners in general and some basic features missing. Example Supabase storage has no direct support for metadata [2][3]. Overall I like the... - Source: Hacker News / 14 days ago

It seems there's no discord community yet for bunny.net, would someone be interested in setting this up? Source: 5 months ago

Use a CDN like Bunny and you can host images for like $1/mo + less than $0.10/gb of bandwidth. Source: 5 months ago

You'll want a CDN like Bunny (at least for the files), instead of a web host. Source: 7 months ago