It's basically still the only game in town for a high performance shared posix filesystem with multiple writers and builtin support in basically all operating systems. As an application developer, I probably wouldn't choose to design a system that needed it. However there are lots of good reasons why a company in 2023 might decide to use this NFS based product: https://cloud.google.com/filestore?hl=en. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

Hi, Brandon from GCS here! If you're looking for all of the guarantees of a real, POSIX filesystem, you want to do fast top level directory listing for 100MM+ nested files, and POSIX permissions/owner/group and other file metadata are important to you, Gcsfuse is probably not what you're after. You might want something more like Filestore: https://cloud.google.com/filestore Gcsfuse is a great way to mount Cloud... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago

At Redactics we needed a way to provide writeable persistent storage to multiple Kubernetes pods. Cost effective ReadWriteMany storage options are generally somewhat limited, in our experience. Using Amazon S3 or the like was also not a great option for us, because the Redactics SMART Agent uses Apache Airflow and the KubernetesPodOperator for a number of its workflow steps - many of which run in parallel. This... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

It sounds like you're looking for Filestore. You can mount Filestore shares as NFS in GKE deployments, and every deployment sees the same set of files. Source: almost 2 years ago

Hi there! I want to show off a little feature I made using hanami, htmx and a little bit of redis + sidekiq. - Source: dev.to / 28 days ago

Sidekiq https://sidekiq.org/: This one started as an open source project, once it got enough traction, the developer made a premium version of it, and makes money by selling licenses to businesses. Source: 6 months ago

> I'm not sure feature withholding has traditionally worked out well in the developer space. I think it's worked out well for Sidekiq (https://sidekiq.org). I really like their model of layering valuable features between the OSS / Pro / Enterprise licenses. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago

The code above isn't idempotent. If you run it twice, it will create two copies, which is probably not what you intended. Why is this important? Because most backend job processors like Sidekiq don't make any guarantees that your jobs will run exactly once. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

Relevant Patio11 comment from 2016: > We don't donate to OSS software which we use, because we're legally not allowed to. > I routinely send key projects, particularly smaller projects, a request to quote me a commercial license of their project, with the explanation that I would accept a quote of $1,000 and that the commercial license can be their existing OSS license plus an invoice. My books suggest we've spent... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago