Google Cloud DNS VS dnsmasq

Google Cloud DNS: This is Google Cloud's offering, designed to provide high-performance and premium networking. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago

Google's enterprise-grade DNS is "Google Cloud DNS" [1]. It's not going anywhere. Google Domains is a consumer-grade product, in the sense that it is lacking most of the features (access control, bulk management) that a large company needs, though it was not lacking in stability / availability. And you could easily hook Google Domains up to Google Workspace to light up email for a small business. Feels like a good... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago

Why not use Cloud DNS and Cloud Storage to host a static website? Source: over 1 year ago

Another solution similar to DNS stubs is to use a managed DNS product. In the case of GCP there is the Cloud DNS product, which handles replicating local DNS entries up to the VPC level for resolution by outside clusters, or even virtual machines within the same VPC. This option offers a lot of benefits, including:. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

You are 100% right that the domain is the keys to the kingdom. Definitely only use registrars and DNS providers that have 2FA. Google has a registrar now, as well as DNS in GCP https://cloud.google.com/domains/docs/register-domain and https://cloud.google.com/dns. By using those you can leverage your Google account's security (use separate accounts for admin level access on GCP and enforce hardware 2FA), and... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

This seems like an improvement over my current solution in that it can keep multiple projects open simultaneously and route to each of them, but does add more complexity to the setup. I'm using Dnsmasq (https://thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/doc.html) to map anything at .lo to the currently running project, like so:

  brew install dnsmasq.

- Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

I would use a simple dns proxy like Blocky if you want adblocking or dnsmasq if you don't. Source: about 1 year ago

The pervious setup was much the same except the lab was under the UDMP without another gateway. I used UnifiOS to create networks(vLANs) and trusted that segregation to work. It did not. As I progressed in my home lab, I went through a few hypervisors and settled on EXSi and vSphere. 100% overkill but that is what labbing is for right? Again progressing through and adding things like windows AD and many Home... Source: over 1 year ago

If you can handle all these, then the easiest way to setup a local dev DNS is dnsmasq. You can install it via HomeBrew. Source: over 1 year ago

If you are still interested, I heartily suggest using dnsmasq to do the dhcp/tftp/PXE service. I’ve used it on airgapped networks to boot systems and install a base Linux OS or run diagnostic tools. Source: over 2 years ago