Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Google App Engine VS Azure Database for PostgreSQL

Compare Google App Engine VS Azure Database for PostgreSQL and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Google App Engine logo Google App Engine

A powerful platform to build web and mobile apps that scale automatically.

Azure Database for PostgreSQL logo Azure Database for PostgreSQL

Try Azure Database for PostgreSQL to build reliable and intelligent applications for your organization.
  • Google App Engine Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-17
  • Azure Database for PostgreSQL Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-05

Google App Engine features and specs

  • Auto-scaling
    Google App Engine automatically scales your application based on the traffic it receives, ensuring that your application can handle varying workloads without manual intervention.
  • Managed environment
    App Engine provides a fully managed environment, covering infrastructure management tasks like server provisioning, patching, monitoring, and managing app versions.
  • Integrated services
    Seamlessly integrates with other Google Cloud services such as Datastore, Cloud SQL, Pub/Sub, and more, offering a comprehensive ecosystem for building and deploying applications.
  • Multiple languages support
    Supports multiple programming languages including Java, Python, PHP, Node.js, Go, Ruby, and .NET, giving developers flexibility in choosing their preferred language.
  • Security
    Offers robust security features including Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cloud Identity, and automated security updates, which help protect your applications from vulnerabilities.
  • Developer productivity
    App Engine allows rapid development and deployment, letting developers focus on writing code without worrying about infrastructure management, thus boosting productivity.
  • Versioning
    Supports versioning of applications, allowing multiple versions of the application to be hosted simultaneously, which helps in A/B testing and rollback capabilities.

Possible disadvantages of Google App Engine

  • Cost
    While you pay for what you use, costs can escalate quickly with high traffic or resource-intensive applications. Detailed cost prediction can be challenging.
  • Vendor lock-in
    Relying heavily on Google App Engine's proprietary services and APIs can make it difficult to migrate applications to other platforms, leading to vendor lock-in.
  • Limited control
    Being a fully managed service, App Engine provides limited control over the underlying infrastructure which might be a limitation for certain advanced use cases.
  • Environment constraints
    Certain restrictions and limitations are imposed on the runtime environment, such as request timeout limits and specific resource quotas, which can affect application performance.
  • Complex debugging
    Debugging issues in a highly abstracted managed environment can be more complex and difficult compared to traditional server-hosted applications.
  • Cold start latency
    Serverless environments like App Engine can suffer from cold start latency, where the initial request triggers a delay as the environment spins up resources.
  • Configuration complexity
    Despite its benefits, configuring and optimizing App Engine for specific scenarios can be more complex than expected, requiring a steep learning curve.

Azure Database for PostgreSQL features and specs

  • Scalability
    Azure Database for PostgreSQL offers high scalability with the ability to easily scale up or down based on demand, which ensures that you can efficiently manage changes in workloads without downtime.
  • Managed Service
    As a fully managed database service, Azure handles database management tasks like patching, backups, and monitoring, allowing developers to focus more on application development rather than infrastructure maintenance.
  • High Availability
    The service provides built-in high availability within the same region, ensuring that your database has minimal downtime and can manage failovers effectively.
  • Security Features
    Azure Database for PostgreSQL offers advanced security features such as encryption at rest and in transit, virtual network service endpoints, and integration with Azure Active Directory for comprehensive security management.
  • Integration with Azure Ecosystem
    The service tightly integrates with other Azure services such as Azure Data Factory, Azure Analytics, and Power BI, enabling comprehensive data solutions and seamless workflows across different applications.

Possible disadvantages of Azure Database for PostgreSQL

  • Cost
    While offering a broad array of features, Azure Database for PostgreSQL can be more expensive compared to managing your own on-premises or cloud-hosted PostgreSQL database, especially as the need for more resources and higher performance grows.
  • Limited Control
    As a managed service, users have less control over the server configurations and underlying hardware, which may be a drawback for applications requiring specific customizations or optimizations.
  • Dependency on Azure Infrastructure
    Relying on Azure's infrastructure means your database availability is tied to Azure's performance and data center outages, which may impact access and operations if issues arise.
  • Learning Curve
    New users transitioning to Azure Database for PostgreSQL from other environments might face a learning curve due to Azure-specific tools and interfaces, requiring time and resources to fully leverage the platform.
  • Feature Parity
    There might be delays in the availability of the latest PostgreSQL features or extensions within Azure Database for PostgreSQL, as updates undergo additional validation and rollout through Azure's platform.

Google App Engine videos

Get to know Google App Engine

More videos:

  • Review - Developing apps that scale automatically with Google App Engine

Azure Database for PostgreSQL videos

Introducing Azure Database for PostgreSQL and Azure Database for MySQL

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Azure #17 - Azure Database for PostgreSQL | Azure Tutorial
  • Review - New ways to get started with Azure Database for PostgreSQL | Azure Friday

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Google App Engine and Azure Database for PostgreSQL)
Cloud Computing
100 100%
0% 0
Databases
0 0%
100% 100
Cloud Hosting
100 100%
0% 0
MySQL Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Google App Engine and Azure Database for PostgreSQL. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Google App Engine and Azure Database for PostgreSQL

Google App Engine Reviews

Top 5 Alternatives to Heroku
Google App Engine is fast, easy, but not that very cheap. The pricing is reasonable, and it comes with a free tier, which is great for small projects that are right for beginner developers who want to quickly set up their apps. It can also auto scale, create new instances as needed and automatically handle high availability. App Engine gets a positive rating for performance...
AppScale - The Google App Engine Alternative
AppScale is open source Google App Engine and allows you to run your GAE applications on any infrastructure, anywhere that makes sense for your business. AppScale eliminates lock-in and makes your GAE application portable. This way you can choose which public or private cloud platform is the best fit for your business requirements. Because we are literally the GAE...

Azure Database for PostgreSQL Reviews

We have no reviews of Azure Database for PostgreSQL yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Google App Engine should be more popular than Azure Database for PostgreSQL. It has been mentiond 31 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Google App Engine mentions (31)

  • Guide to modern app-hosting without servers on Google Cloud
    If Google App Engine (GAE) is the "OG" serverless platform, Cloud Run (GCR) is its logical successor, crafted for today's modern app-hosting needs. GAE was the 1st generation of Google serverless platforms. It has since been joined, about a decade later, by 2nd generation services, GCR and Cloud Functions (GCF). GCF is somewhat out-of-scope for this post so I'll cover that another time. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Security in the Cloud: Your Role in the Shared Responsibility Model
    As Windsales Inc. expands, it adopts a PaaS model to offload server and runtime management, allowing its developers and engineers to focus on code development and deployment. By partnering with providers like Heroku and Google App Engine, Windsales Inc. Accesses a fully managed runtime environment. This choice relieves Windsales Inc. Of managing servers, OS updates, or runtime environment behavior. Instead,... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Hosting apps in the cloud with Google App Engine in 2024
    Google App Engine (GAE) is their original serverless solution and first cloud product, launching in 2008 (video), giving rise to Serverless 1.0 and the cloud computing platform-as-a-service (PaaS) service level. It didn't do function-hosting nor was the concept of containers mainstream yet. GAE was specifically for (web) app-hosting (but also supported mobile backends as well). - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Fixing A Broken Deployment to Google App Engine
    In 2014, I took a web development on Udacity that was taught by Steve Huffman of Reddit fame. He taught authentication, salting passwords, the difference between GET and POST requests, basic html and css, caching techniques. It was a fantastic introduction to web dev. To pass the course, students deployed simple python servers to Google App Engine. When I started to look for work, I opted to use code from that... - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Next.js Deployment: Vercel's Charm vs. GCP's Muscle
    GCP offers a comprehensive suite of cloud services, including Compute Engine, App Engine, and Cloud Run. This translates to unparalleled control over your infrastructure and deployment configurations. Designed for large-scale applications, GCP effortlessly scales to accommodate significant traffic growth. Additionally, for projects heavily reliant on Google services like BigQuery, Cloud Storage, or AI/ML tools,... - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
View more

Azure Database for PostgreSQL mentions (9)

  • Everyone Uses Postgres… But Why?
    Cloud deployment: PostgreSQL can be deployed in the cloud with AWS RDS, Amazon Aurora, Azure Database for PostgreSQL, or Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Configuring a Connection Pool
    Azure database for PostgreSQL supports built-in PgBouncer. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Top 8 Managed Postgres Providers
    Microsoft Azure Database is a completely managed PostgreSQL database service made to manage important workloads with included high availability and ability to grow. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • DBT with Azure SQL Database
    I started writing a much longer post, but it really boils down to one thing - just use Azure PostgreSQL. It's great value, well supported by DBT, and an actual DW option. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Sharing a web layer fails with error 00231, despite the database already being registered as an ArcGIS Server data store
    I have a PostgreSQL database instance running in the Azure Database for PostgreSQL service. I am able to successfully connect and create enterprise geodatabases within. I am also able to successfully register the data store, both via ArcGIS Pro and ArcGIS Server Manager. However, when attempting to share a table in the database as a web layer (right click > Sharing > Share as web layer), it will ultimately fail... Source: about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Google App Engine and Azure Database for PostgreSQL, you can also consider the following products

Salesforce Platform - Salesforce Platform is a comprehensive PaaS solution that paves the way for the developers to test, build, and mitigate the issues in the cloud application before the final deployment.

DBeaver - DBeaver - Universal Database Manager and SQL Client.

Dokku - Docker powered mini-Heroku in around 100 lines of Bash

Navicat Premium - Navicat Premium allows user to connect MySQL, MariaDB, MongoDB, SQL Server, SQLite, Oracle & PostgreSQL databases within a single application, includes data modeling feature

Heroku - Agile deployment platform for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, and Scala. Setup takes only minutes and deploys are instant through git. Leave tedious server maintenance to Heroku and focus on your code.

Amazon Athena - Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Athena is serverless, so there is no infrastructure to manage, and you pay only for the queries that you run.