Google App Engine VS Apache Camel

Google App Engine Reviews

Apache Camel Reviews

Google App Engine mentions (25)

• CQL Trace Viewer: Visualizing CQL Traces with Dash

  To deploy the app, we can use Google Cloud App Engine, which is specifically built for server-side rendered websites. After we create a new project in the Google Cloud Console, we have to configure the cql-trace-viewer application. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago

• Which service to host a Discord bot?

  I've read that article, but I'm thinking there are other better (and most importantly cheaper) ways of doing that, such as using App Engine (given that you have to mitigate the maximum request timeout and to make sure there are constantly exactly 1 instance running). Source: 12 months ago

• Using NextJs for front-end only?

  Shout out to GCP App Engine for deploying anode/Express severe. Source: 12 months ago

• What will Komi's resume look like?

  If your project is a bit more complicated using next.js or react.js or angular.js, you may find some free Platfrom-as-a-Service%20is%20a%20complete%20cloud%20environment,middleware%2C%20tools%2C%20and%20more.). I have seen some of my peers using free PaaS like Heroku, Vercel and I have no experience in using PaaS but I will recommend you to use PaaS from either of the three 1. Google Cloud's Google App Engine 2.... Source: about 1 year ago

• JDK 20 and JDK 21: What We Know So Far

  UNIX is irrelevant on the cloud, unless one is stuck deploying legacy workloads on VMs, this is what we use in modern applications not stuck in the past. https://aws.amazon.com/eks/ https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/kubernetes-service https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/ https://cloud.google.com/appengine https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/app-service https://aws.amazon.com/lambda/... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

Apache Camel mentions (12)

• Ask HN: What is the correct way to deal with pipelines?

  "correct" is a value judgement that depends on lots of different things. Only you can decide which tool is correct. Here are some ideas: - https://camel.apache.org/ - https://www.windmill.dev/ Your idea about a queue (in redis, or postgres, or sqlite, etc) is also totally valid. These off-the-shelf tools I listed probably wouldn't give you a huge advantage IMO. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

• Why messaging is much better than REST for inter-microservice communications

  This reminds me more of Apache Camel[0] than other things it's being compared to. > The process initiator puts a message on a queue, and another processor picks that up (probably on a different service, on a different host, and in different code base) - does some processing, and puts its (intermediate) result on another queue This is almost exactly the definition of message routing (ie: Camel). I'm a bit doubtful... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

• Can I continuously write to a CSV file with a python script while a Java application is continuously reading from it?

  Since you're writing a Java app to consume this, I highly recommend Apache Camel to do the consuming of messages for it. You can trivially aim it at file systems, message queues, databases, web services and all manner of other sources to grab your data for you, and you can change your mind about what that source is, without having to rewrite most of your client code. Source: over 1 year ago

• S3 to S3 transform

  For a simple sequential Pipeline, my goto would be Apache Camel. As soon as you want complexity its either Apache Nifi or a micro service architecture. Source: over 1 year ago

• 🗞️ We have just released our JBang! catalog 🛍️

  🐪 Apache Camel : Camel JBang, A JBang-based Camel app for easily running Camel routes. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago